국제금융위기 이후 중국의 국제정세 인식과 외교전략 - ‘공세외교’ 논란을 중심으로
China’s Perception on the International Situation and its Diplomatic Strategy After the Global Financial Crisis - Focusing on the ‘Assertive Diplomacy’ Controversy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this review, China’s perception on the international situation and its diplomatic strategy changes were examined for China with its drastically improved international status since the 2008 global financial crisis. China’s diplomatic behavior during 2009-2010 especially became very assertive unlike that in the past, and China’s according internal assessment and controversy were summarized. China’s assertive diplomacy became amplified as China’s overconfidence on status elevation was combined with the rising of nationalism during the process of responding to the financial crisis. However, the Chinese leadership and the mainstream learned circles are taking a prudent approach of regarding the attempt to challenge the US or change the existing order as being inappropriate to the current national power of China. During this process, the concept of ‘core interest’ is frequently emphasized as an important concept for understanding China’s future diplomatic strategy. In regards to its core interest, the Chinese government presents the three core interests of territory sovereignty, the Chinese Communist Party centered political system and sustainable economic development. China’s foreign policy in the future is expected to be expressed through different methods of response strategy upon dividing into core interest and non-core interest.
Abstract
In this review, China’s perception on the international situation and its diplomatic strategy changes were examined for China with its drastically improved international status since the 2008 global financial crisis. China’s diplomatic behavior during 2009-2010 especially became very assertive unlike that in the past, and China’s according internal assessment and controversy were summarized. China’s assertive diplomacy became amplified as China’s overconfidence on status elevation was combined with the rising of nationalism during the process of responding to the financial crisis. However, the Chinese leadership and the mainstream learned circles are taking a prudent approach of regarding the attempt to challenge the US or change the existing order as being inappropriate to the current national power of China. During this process, the concept of ‘core interest’ is frequently emphasized as an important concept for understanding China’s future diplomatic strategy. In regards to its core interest, the Chinese government presents the three core interests of territory sovereignty, the Chinese Communist Party centered political system and sustainable economic development. China’s foreign policy in the future is expected to be expressed through different methods of response strategy upon dividing into core interest and non-core interest.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김도희, "신자유주의의 위기와 중국의 개혁 담론- 금융위기 이후 최근 논의와 관련해서", 중소연구, 33(3), pp.39~63 (2009), 아태지역연구센터
- 김재철, "중국의 외교전략과 국제질서", pp.78~81 (2007), 폴리테이아
- 김재철, "세계금융위기와 중국의 대미정책", 중소연구, 34(2), pp.15~40 (2010), 아태지역연구센터
- 이동률, "중국의 유엔외교: 원칙, 수사, 그리고 전략, In 중국 외교연구의 새로운 영역", pp.127~177 (2008), 나남
- 이문기, "국제 금융위기에 대한 중국의 대응과 국가능력", 신아세아, 17(2), pp.156~178 (2010), 신아시아연구소
- Roger Altman, "The Great Crash, 2008: Geopolitical Setback for the West", Foreign Affairs (2009)
- Hung Ho-fung, "America’s Head Servant? The PRC’s Dilemma in the Global Crisis", New Left Review, (60), pp.5~25 (2009)
- Robert L. Suettinger, "The Rise and Descent of ‘peaceful Rise’", China Leadership Monitor, (12) (2004)
- Eswar Prasad, "Rebalancing the U.S. -China Lelationship" (2011), The Brookings Institution
- Michael D. Swaine, "Perceptions of an Assertive China", China Leadership Monitor, (32) (2010)
- Michael D. Swaine, "China’s Assertive Behavior, Part One: ‘Core Interests’", ChinaLeadership Monitor, (34) (2011)
- Thomas J. Christensen, "The Advantages of an Assertive China: Responding to Beijing’s Abrasive Diplomacy", Foreign Affairs (2011)
- Abraham Denmark, "China’s Arrival: A Strategic Framework for a Global Relationship" (2009), Center for New American Security
- Joseph S. Nye, "American and Chinese Power after the Financial Crisis", The Washington Quarterly weraf, (4) (2010)
- Wang Jisi, "China’s Search for a grand Strategy: A Rising Greater Power Finds Its Way", Foreign Affairs (2011)
- "TIME", ~ (2009)
- "The Dangers of a Rising China, The Economist", ~ (2010)
- John Pomfet, "Newly powerful China defies Western nations with remarks, policies, Washington Post", ~ (2010)
- Andrew Small, "Dealing with a More Assertive China, Forbes", ~ (2010)
- David Shambaugh, "The Chinese tiger shows its claws, Financial Times", ~ (2010)
- "鄧小平文選(3卷)", pp.353~ (1993), 人民出版社
- 江澤民, "加快改革開放和現代化建設步伐, 奪取有中國特色社會主義事業的更多勝利, 人民日報", ~ (1992)
- 溫家寶, "把目光投向中國，文匯報", ~ (2003)
- 溫家寶, "中國和平崛起的要義, 人民网", ~ (2004)
- 王泰平, "鄧小平外交思想硏究論文集" (1996), 世界知識出版社
- 安衛, "十字路口上的世界: 中國著名學者探討21世紀的國際焦點" (2000), 中國人民大學出版社
- 김태성, "앵그리 차이나" (2009), 북이십일 21세기북스
- 閻學通, "和平崛起與保障和平", 國際問題硏究, (3), pp.16~ (2004)
- 金燦榮, "2010年中國外交新態勢", 現代國際關係, (7), pp.7~ (2010)
- 劉建飛, "國際金融危機背景下的中國對外戰略", 探索與爭鳴, (3) (2009)
- 王緝思, "樂觀看待中美關係", 南風窓, (21) (2008)
- 王緝思, "中國的國際定位問題與‘韜光養晦 有所作爲’的戰略思想", 國際問題硏究, (2), pp.4~9 (2011)
- 李軍, "中國與世界: 在適應和調整中進入新階段", 當代世界, (1) (2011)
- 宮力, "美國的‘覇權焦慮’與中國的應對方略", 現代國際關係, (11), pp.14~16 (2010)
- 葉自成, "關于韜光養晦和有所作爲", 太平洋學報, (1), pp.62~66 (2002)
- 范慶華, "中美關係如何才能健康發展?, 世界知識", ~ (2011)
- 朱威烈, "關于‘韜光養晦和有所作爲’外交方略的思考", 國際展望, (3), pp.1~7 (2010)
- 趙曉春, "中國外交: ‘有所作爲’到‘順勢而爲’", 現代國際關係, (11), pp.8~11 (2010)
- 王逸舟, "多極化不等于反美, 環球時報", ~ (1999)
- 張家棟, "力量對比變化, 中美關係面臨新局面, 解放日報", ~ (2009)
- 任仲平, "迎戰國際金融危機的‘中國答卷’, 人民日報", ~ (2010)
- "中國走向‘大外交’, 人民日報 海外版", ~ (2011)
- "首輪中美經濟對話: 除上月球外主要問題均己談及, 中國新聞网", ~ (2009)