한일 거절표현의 구조에 대한 사회언어학적 접근
Sociolinguistic Approach on Refusal Expressions in Korea and Japan
2
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research compared and analyzed the refusal expressions in Korea and Japan. The result of the investigation is as follows:1) Both countries have the same patternof semantic formulas for refusal expressions that includes [Apology> Explanation for Refusal> Expression of Impossibility> Promise] in order of decreasing frequency. It is notable that Koreans utilize more varied expressions whereas Japanese resort to somewhat standardized expressions. 2) In Japan, "Apology," "Explanation for Refusal," and "Promise"constitute a high percentage of refusal expressions while Koreans frequently use "Alternative Proposal," "Calling One’s Attention," and "Hesitation." This shows that Koreans more indirectly decline requests from their seniors than Japanese people. 3) In order to mitigate the uneasiness of Expressing Impossibility, Koreans use a number of different semantic formulas before and after Expressing Impossibility. On the other hand, Japanese people tend to use semantic formulas only before Expressing Impossibility. 4) Koreans use the pattern of [Apology + Explanation for Refusal + Expressing Impossibility + Apology, Alternate Proposal, Promise] most frequently whereas Japanese people usethe pattern of [Apology + Explanation for Refusal + Expressing Impossibility + Proposing Preconditions + Promise] most frequently. It is interesting to note that Japanese have the pattern highly standardized. Moreover, when Expressing Impossibility, Koreans use relatively more "Hesitation" and "Calling One’s Attention"compared to Japanese. The reason for this particular pattern may be to express uneasiness and convey an apologetic feeling for Expressing Impossibility and create a sense of closeness. 5) In providing explanations for refusal, Koreans cite [Personal Reasons>Customary Reasons>Public Reasons] in order of decreasing frequency whereas Japanese cite [Customary Reasons> Personal Reasons>Public Reasons]. In other words, Koreans use reasons such as a lack of talent or family circumstances whereas Japanese people excuse themselves using customary reasons.
Abstract
This research compared and analyzed the refusal expressions in Korea and Japan. The result of the investigation is as follows:1) Both countries have the same patternof semantic formulas for refusal expressions that includes [Apology> Explanation for Refusal> Expression of Impossibility> Promise] in order of decreasing frequency. It is notable that Koreans utilize more varied expressions whereas Japanese resort to somewhat standardized expressions. 2) In Japan, "Apology," "Explanation for Refusal," and "Promise"constitute a high percentage of refusal expressions while Koreans frequently use "Alternative Proposal," "Calling One’s Attention," and "Hesitation." This shows that Koreans more indirectly decline requests from their seniors than Japanese people. 3) In order to mitigate the uneasiness of Expressing Impossibility, Koreans use a number of different semantic formulas before and after Expressing Impossibility. On the other hand, Japanese people tend to use semantic formulas only before Expressing Impossibility. 4) Koreans use the pattern of [Apology + Explanation for Refusal + Expressing Impossibility + Apology, Alternate Proposal, Promise] most frequently whereas Japanese people usethe pattern of [Apology + Explanation for Refusal + Expressing Impossibility + Proposing Preconditions + Promise] most frequently. It is interesting to note that Japanese have the pattern highly standardized. Moreover, when Expressing Impossibility, Koreans use relatively more "Hesitation" and "Calling One’s Attention"compared to Japanese. The reason for this particular pattern may be to express uneasiness and convey an apologetic feeling for Expressing Impossibility and create a sense of closeness. 5) In providing explanations for refusal, Koreans cite [Personal Reasons>Customary Reasons>Public Reasons] in order of decreasing frequency whereas Japanese cite [Customary Reasons> Personal Reasons>Public Reasons]. In other words, Koreans use reasons such as a lack of talent or family circumstances whereas Japanese people excuse themselves using customary reasons.
참고문헌 (16)
- 서희정, "일본어 모어 학습자를 위한 한국어 거절 표현 교육 연구", 이중언어학, (20), pp.131~158 (2002), 이중언어학회
- 원 지 은, "국문 일본어와 한국어의 거절의 구조 -意味公式の配列順序の分析を中心に-", 일어일문학, (28), pp.69~76 (2005), 대한일어일문학회
- 오준아, "거절표현의 일한대조연구", 석사, pp.1996
- 이해영, "일본인 한국어 고급 학습자의 거절 화행 실현 양상 연구", 한국어 교육, 14(2), pp.11~326 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 전정미, "거절 화행의 실현 양상", 한말연구, (19), pp.371~394 (2006), 한말연구학회
- 生駒知子, "英語から日本語へのプラグマテイック․トランスフアー:「断り」という発話行為について", 日本語教育, (79) (1993), 日本語教育学会
- 任栄哲, "箸とチョッカラクーことばと文化の日韓比較ー" (2004), 大修館書店
- 尾崎喜光, "対人行動の日韓対照研究" (2008), ひつじ書房
- 熊井浩子, "外国人の待遇行動の分析(2)-断り行動を中心にして-", 研究報告人文・社会科学篇, 28(2) (1993), 静岡大学教養学部
- 態谷智子, "依賴の仕方ー國硏岡崎調査のデータから", 日本語學, 14(10) (1995)
- 西村史子, "断りに用いられる言い訳の日英対照分析", 世界の日本語教育, (17) (2007), 国際交流基金日本語国際センター
- 目黒秋子, "'断り'のストラテジー分析ー日本人,韓国語学習者,韓国人の比較ー", 言語, 19(8) (1998)
- 森山卓郎, "断りの方略:対人関係調整とコミュニケーション", 言語, 19(8) (1990)
- 横山杉子, "日本語における日本人の日本人に対する断りと日本人のアメリカ人に対する断りの比較", 日本語教育, (81) (1993), 日本語教育学会
- Beebe, Leslie M., "Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. in: Developing communicative competence in a second language", pp.55~73 (1990), Heinle & Heinle Publishers
- Brown, P., "Politeness: some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
