본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

거절이유에 따른 부담도 및 거절전략의 한일대조 - 거절상대와의 상하․친소관계에 주목하여 -

The comparison between Korean and Japanese regarding the level of feeling the burden and the refusal strategies according to refusal reasons - focused on hierarchy and intimacy between interlocutors -

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper covered the level of feeling the burden brought about when rejecting and refusal strategies through cross-linguistic comparisons and analyses between Korean and Japan. The survey on this led to the conclusion as follows. For one thing, according to the result of survey on the entire level of feeling the burden, Koreans feel the burden the most when rejecter and rejectee are close to each other and in the same social status. And the second highest level of feeling the burden takes place when they are close to each other and yet interlocutor is in the higher position, followed by the situation where they know little about each other (that is, they are not close to each other) and their hierarchical status is not the same. Lastly, they feel the burden the least when they feel distant and their hierarchical position is the same. On the contrary, Japanese tend to feel the burden the most when they are close but rejecter is lower than rejectee in terms of the hierarchical status , followed by the condition where they are close to each other and in the same hierarchical level. As shown above, both countries take into consideration closeness relationship rather than hierarchical relationship. Next, considering the level of feeling the burden in accordance of the reason of rejection, it is found that when they reject due to the incapability or the inappropriate circumstance to deal with the offer, they feel certain amount of low burden, while when they should reject toward close hearer because of psychological reason or causes on their own principle, they are found to feel the conspicuous high level of burden. Third, the survey indicates that in the case of rejection attributed to the lack of ability or circumstance, both of the countries have the stereotyped refusal patterns, whereas they are divided up into roughly two type of refusal patterns depending on whether they are close to each other.

Abstract

This paper covered the level of feeling the burden brought about when rejecting and refusal strategies through cross-linguistic comparisons and analyses between Korean and Japan. The survey on this led to the conclusion as follows. For one thing, according to the result of survey on the entire level of feeling the burden, Koreans feel the burden the most when rejecter and rejectee are close to each other and in the same social status. And the second highest level of feeling the burden takes place when they are close to each other and yet interlocutor is in the higher position, followed by the situation where they know little about each other (that is, they are not close to each other) and their hierarchical status is not the same. Lastly, they feel the burden the least when they feel distant and their hierarchical position is the same. On the contrary, Japanese tend to feel the burden the most when they are close but rejecter is lower than rejectee in terms of the hierarchical status , followed by the condition where they are close to each other and in the same hierarchical level. As shown above, both countries take into consideration closeness relationship rather than hierarchical relationship. Next, considering the level of feeling the burden in accordance of the reason of rejection, it is found that when they reject due to the incapability or the inappropriate circumstance to deal with the offer, they feel certain amount of low burden, while when they should reject toward close hearer because of psychological reason or causes on their own principle, they are found to feel the conspicuous high level of burden. Third, the survey indicates that in the case of rejection attributed to the lack of ability or circumstance, both of the countries have the stereotyped refusal patterns, whereas they are divided up into roughly two type of refusal patterns depending on whether they are close to each other.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 荒巻朋子, "アメリカ人と日本人の断り表現の比較", 長崎大学留学生センター紀要, (7) (1999)
  2. 生駒知子, "英語から日本語へのプラグマティック․トランスファー:断りという発話行為について", 日本語教育, (79) (1993), 日本語教育学会
  3. 伊藤恵美子, "マレー語母語話者の語用的能力と滞日期間の関係について─勧誘に対する"断り"行為に見られる工学系ブミプトラのポライトネス", 日本語教育, (115) (2002), 日本語教育学会
  4. 李賢貞, "韓․日両言語における「断り」言語行動の対照─断りのプロセスを中心に─", 석사, pp.2006
  5. 大倉美和子, "語用論研究と日本語教育─メキシコ人と日本人の"誘いに断る発話"─, In 対照研究と日本語教育(日本語と外国語との対照研究:10)" (2002), 国立国語研究所
  6. 吳俊雅, "拒絶表現의 日韓對照연구", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.1997
  7. 柏崎秀子, "話しかけ行動の談話分析-依頼․要求表現の実際を中心に-", 日本語教育, 79 (1993), 日本語教育学会
  8. カノックワン, "日本語における󰡔断り󰡕─日本語教科書 と実際の会話との分析", 日本語教育, (87) (1995), 日本語教育学会
  9. カノックワン, "日本語学習者に見られる「断り」の表現:日本語母語話者と比べて", 世界の日本語教育, (7) (1997), 国際交流基金日本語教育センター
  10. 熊谷浩子, "外国人待遇行動の分析(2)─断り表現を中心にして─", 静岡大学教養部研究報告, 28(2) (1993), 人文․社会言語学
  11. 鮫島重喜, "コミュニケーションタスクにおける日本語学習者の定型表現․文末表現の学習過程-中国語話者の「依頼」「断り」「謝罪」の場合", 日本語教育, (98) (1998), 日本語教育学会
  12. 서희정, "한국어 거절 화행 교육 연구 : 교재 분석을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2001
  13. 野村美穂子, "断りの表現─コミュニケーションと含意", 言語学論叢, (10) (1992), 筑波大学-般․応用言語学研究室.
  14. 藤森弘子, "日本語学習に見られる󰡔辯明󰡕意味公式の形式と使用─中国人、韓国人学習者の場合", 日本語教育, (87) (1995), 日本語教育学会
  15. 目黒秋子, "日本語の談話における間接的断り理解の過程─母語話者の認知の視点から─", 日本語学会論集 (1996), 東北大学文学部
  16. 目黒秋子, ""断り"のストラテジー分析─日本人、韓国語学習者、韓国人の比較─", 日本語文学, 5 (1998), 日本語文学会
  17. 森山卓郎, "断りの方略─対人関係調整とコミュニケーション", 言語, 19(8) (1990), 大修館書店
  18. 横山杉子, "日本語における"日本人の日本人に対する断り"と"日本人のアメリカ人に対する断り"", 日本語教育, (85) (1993), 日本語教育学会
  19. ルンティーラ ワンウィモン, "タイ人日本語学習者の「提案に対する断り」表現における語用論的転移─タイ語と日本語の発話パターンの比較から─", 日本語教育, (121) (2004), 日本語教育学会
  20. 元智恩, "意味公式で分析した日本語と韓国語の断り", 日本語文学 (2000), 일본어문학회
  21. 元智恩, "断りとして用いられた日韓の󰡔言いさし文󰡕についての語用論的分析", 日語日文学 (2000), 대한일어일문학회
  22. 元智恩, "日本語と韓国語の断り表現の構造─指導教官の依頼を断る場面を中心に", 言語学論叢, (21) (2002), 筑波大学 一般․応用言語学研究室

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)