千字文의 受容과 텍스트에 관한 韓日比較硏究
A Comparative study of Korea and Japan on embracing and text of Cheonjamun
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study deals with acceptation of Cheonjamun in Korea and Japan in side of its text, selectes presentative texts, compares and considers about original text. By considering it can estimate when original texts of the two nations are established. In case of Japan, almost existing texts have annotation and all of Japanese texts in this study deals with Cheonjamun annotated by Li Seom. However it is common that Korean Cheonjamun texts have not annotation, there is one meaning and one sound of Hanzi each characters. Moreover in the two nations Cheonjamun are used to elementary study of Hanzi, but in Korea it is regarded as importance comparison with Japan. Cheonjamun, in side of contents and difficulty, is not easy to understand. Althought Korean considers as book for beginner. This consider result from way and purpose of studying of Chosen era. This study deals with Ueno-bon, the oldest text of Japan when it is written and put Kunten(punctuation mark on Chinese text) 13th century and Tōdai-bon(15th century) as Japanese Cheonjamun texts. In result of comparison with contents of these two texts, there are 26 different points. There are 4 different points result from avoiding True name, it is changed original text. I found through this study, original text of Ueno-bon is established in the mid-tenth century, original text of Tōdai-bon established after end of eleventh century. In result of comparison with Kwangju text and Seokbong text what are Korean Cheonjamun texts and Difference between Ueno-bon and Tōdai-bon, it is considered that Korean texts are established before mid 10th century. I will deal with traditional study of Cheonjamun in Japan and Korea on the basis of this study.
Abstract
This study deals with acceptation of Cheonjamun in Korea and Japan in side of its text, selectes presentative texts, compares and considers about original text. By considering it can estimate when original texts of the two nations are established. In case of Japan, almost existing texts have annotation and all of Japanese texts in this study deals with Cheonjamun annotated by Li Seom. However it is common that Korean Cheonjamun texts have not annotation, there is one meaning and one sound of Hanzi each characters. Moreover in the two nations Cheonjamun are used to elementary study of Hanzi, but in Korea it is regarded as importance comparison with Japan. Cheonjamun, in side of contents and difficulty, is not easy to understand. Althought Korean considers as book for beginner. This consider result from way and purpose of studying of Chosen era. This study deals with Ueno-bon, the oldest text of Japan when it is written and put Kunten(punctuation mark on Chinese text) 13th century and Tōdai-bon(15th century) as Japanese Cheonjamun texts. In result of comparison with contents of these two texts, there are 26 different points. There are 4 different points result from avoiding True name, it is changed original text. I found through this study, original text of Ueno-bon is established in the mid-tenth century, original text of Tōdai-bon established after end of eleventh century. In result of comparison with Kwangju text and Seokbong text what are Korean Cheonjamun texts and Difference between Ueno-bon and Tōdai-bon, it is considered that Korean texts are established before mid 10th century. I will deal with traditional study of Cheonjamun in Japan and Korea on the basis of this study.
참고문헌 (29)
- 小川環樹, "書道全集5", pp.8~18 (1966), 平凡社
- 小川環樹, "千字文(岩波文庫33-20-1", pp.385~425 (1997), 岩波書店
- 木田章義, "千字文(岩波文庫33-20-1)", pp.427~442 (1997), 岩波書店
- 黒田彰, "上野本『注千字文』", 国文学, 59, pp.38~69 (1982), 関西大学国文学会
- 黒田彰, "上野本注千字文注解", pp.1~196 (1989), 和泉書院
- 野村茂生, "千字文を読み説く" (2009), 大修館書店
- 山崎誠, "本邦旧伝注千字文攷", 平安文学研究, 69, pp.23~34 (1983)
- 오미영, "15세기 일본의 천자문 학습-東京大學 國語硏究室 소장『註千字文』을 대상으로-", 일어일문학연구, 89(1), pp.147~165 (2014), 한국일어일문학회
- 藤本幸夫, "조선판 천자문의 계통", 조선학보, 94, pp.63~117 (1980)
- 과 複數字釋, "어문연구(語文硏究)", 2005, 7~32, pp.한국어문교육연구회
- 박병철, "四體 ≪千字文≫과 文脈之釋의 反影에 관한 硏究", 國語學, 49(49), pp.253~276 (2007), 국어학회
- 박병철, "<千字文>에 나오는 漢字의 訓에 관한 硏究 —文脈의 意味와 달리 나타나는 訓을 중심으로—", 국어국문학, 15(150), pp.101~128 (2008), 국어국문학회
- 손희하, "石峰千字文 板本 硏究", 한중인문학연구, 33(33), pp.185~210 (2011), 한중인문학회
- 申東嬉, "韓國本"千字文"의 異體字 比較硏究", 서지학연구, 13, pp.101~127 (1997)
- 안미경, "千字文 刊印本 硏究", pp.19~239 (2004), 이회
- 안병희, "내각문고소장 石峰千字文에 대하여", 서지학, 6, pp.29~42 (1974)
- 안병희, "천자문의 계통", 정신문화연구, 5, pp.145~161 (1982)
- 이기문, "漢字의 釋에 관한 硏究", 東亞文化, 11, pp.231~269 (1972)
- 이기문, "石峰千字文에 대하여", 국어국문학, 55, pp.395~402 (1972)
- 이기문, "千字文 硏究(1)", 한국문화, 2, pp.1~17 (1981)
- 이기문, "石峰 千字文에 대하여", 한글한자문화, 1, pp.67~69 (1999)
- 이충구, "교수용 주해천자문", pp.5~40 (2012), 전통문화연구회
- 임동석, "『千字文』의 源流,內容 및 韓國에서의 發展 상황 考察", 중국어문학논집, 56(56), pp.281~304 (2009), 중국어문학연구회
- 李孝善, "韓国『千字文』書誌", 京都大学歴史文化社会論講座紀要, 10, pp.33~55 (2013)
- 최범훈, "‘千字文’의 字釋攷", 國語國文學論文集, 9, pp.197~221 (1975)
- 최범훈, "《註解千字文》의 複數字釋字에 대하여", 國語國文學論文集, 12, pp.19~42 (1983)
- 최학근, "천자문에 대하여", 국어국문학, 83, pp.215~219 (1980)
- 오미영, "論語 관련 資料의 韓日 比較 硏究", 일본연구, 33(33), pp.193~213 (2007), 일본연구소
- 오미영, "小學의 受用과 訓讀에 관한 韓日比較硏究", 일본연구, 43(43), pp.309~329 (2010), 일본연구소