일본의 천자문 학습의 변천 - 上野本·東大本·谷村本을 대상으로 -

Abstract

This study deals with transition of Kundoku of Senjimon[Thousand-Character classic] in Japan, it is based on Miyoung Oh(2014A)'s previous study about Kundoku of Todaibon Senjimon as diacritical material of 15th centuries. It deals with Uenobon that diacritical material of 13th centuries, Tanimurabon that written at 17th centuries and considers with transition of Kundoku on Thousand letter essay from 13th centuries to 15th centuries and to 17th centuries. At first, it considered about adoption and fixing of Monzenyomi. Charateristic of Monzenyomi is inserting particle 'ノ[no]' or 'ト[to]' between Ondoku(Japanese prononciation of Chinese charater) part and Kundoku(vernacular reading of Japanese) part when it is read. Senjimon diacritical text in the generations to come, it is typical that like these particles are entried in right side. In Uenobon, but, some particles are written in left side. As a whole, when Monzenyomi is adopted as reading way Ondoku and Kundoku parts are divided into left-right side by Chinese character. In the beginning of adopting, particle 'ノ[no]' or 'ト[to]' is input on left side, in other words it entried in Kundoku part. In the latter it is moved to right side, in other words Ondoku part. I estimate that this form is fixed like this way. It is shown Monzenyomi in Uenobon, it supposed that Monzenyomi is adopted as Kundoku method of Senjimon at least 13th centuries. Moreover it is estimated Uenobon show early figure of Monzenyomi, it is adopted as diacritical method of Senjimon, in aspect of diacritical codes in Uenobon. In second, this study focuses on the Monzenyomi and analyzes that change of word order, change of self-sufficient words, and then abstract from 3 diacritical materials. In result of comparison Uenobon and Todaibon, there are 10 examples are apparently different. 8 examples in its examples Todaibon and Tanimurabon havesame word order. There are 158 examples in part of self-sufficient word between Uenobon and Todaibon. And then these examples are compared with Tanimurabon. In result of comparison, there are 25 examplesare same, but there are 125 examples between Todaibon and Tanimurabon. It is almost 5 times differency. Word order also same. Tanimurabon partially refer to Uenobon, but it is clear what most of examples are succeed to Todaibon because 2 materials are written in comparatively near age. And especially it is confirmed Tanimurabon succeed previous Senjimon diacritical text through examples of self-sufficient word. But there are also some kind of different meaning is written, so it suggested what reference of previous diacritical materials, besides create new diacritical way through this study.