인도네시아 서 파푸아 특별자치제에 관한 연구
A Study on the Special Autonomy System of West Papua in Indonesia
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research focused on the special autonomy system of West Papua (Papua Barat) in Indonesia. The background of the establishment of Papua and the enactment of the special autonomy system in Papua were covered in this research. Also, the countermeasures taken by the Indonesian government in response to Papua’s human right issues, the form of the legislation of the special autonomy system, and the consequences from the enactment of this policy were analyzed in this research. West Papua is a state resulting from the transfer of sovereignty from the Dutch colonial authorities in 1963. It was officially recognized as the 26th Province of Indonesia in 1969. In the process of deciding whether this province should be merged with Indonesia, the central government appeals to forceful measures by making sure that everyone agrees with the merge. In 1961, West Papua Congress was founded and acted as an organization representing the aborigines of the region. The aim of the congress was to achieve independence in 1970 and they did so by banning the use of the national anthem and the national flag. Besides, the parliament was forced to dissolve. Pressure politic was introduced in response to the demand for independence by the aborigines. In the process of implementing an integrated policy, human rights in West Papua were infringed. As a form of countermeasure done by Indonesian government on the human rights issues in Papua, a special autonomy system was enacted on the Papua Province. This action was viewed as an appeasement policy done by the central government to cease the independence movement. The implementation of the system enabled the Papua province to be conducted as a local government which had certain degree of freedom. However, the economic development of Papua dropped significantly after the special autonomy system was introduced. Although the government was changed, marking the beginning of democracy, the lives of the aborigines were not improving. Instead their lives were worse than before. As a result, the introduction of the special autonomy system was a failure. The main reasons were the lack of understanding about the local situation and the inability of creating an effective policy that is fair among the local people. Besides, the absence of the mutual trust between the central government and the local government has become a barrier to effectively implement the policy. Therefore, there is a need to re-inspect the Papua’s special autonomy system.
Abstract
This research focused on the special autonomy system of West Papua (Papua Barat) in Indonesia. The background of the establishment of Papua and the enactment of the special autonomy system in Papua were covered in this research. Also, the countermeasures taken by the Indonesian government in response to Papua’s human right issues, the form of the legislation of the special autonomy system, and the consequences from the enactment of this policy were analyzed in this research. West Papua is a state resulting from the transfer of sovereignty from the Dutch colonial authorities in 1963. It was officially recognized as the 26th Province of Indonesia in 1969. In the process of deciding whether this province should be merged with Indonesia, the central government appeals to forceful measures by making sure that everyone agrees with the merge. In 1961, West Papua Congress was founded and acted as an organization representing the aborigines of the region. The aim of the congress was to achieve independence in 1970 and they did so by banning the use of the national anthem and the national flag. Besides, the parliament was forced to dissolve. Pressure politic was introduced in response to the demand for independence by the aborigines. In the process of implementing an integrated policy, human rights in West Papua were infringed. As a form of countermeasure done by Indonesian government on the human rights issues in Papua, a special autonomy system was enacted on the Papua Province. This action was viewed as an appeasement policy done by the central government to cease the independence movement. The implementation of the system enabled the Papua province to be conducted as a local government which had certain degree of freedom. However, the economic development of Papua dropped significantly after the special autonomy system was introduced. Although the government was changed, marking the beginning of democracy, the lives of the aborigines were not improving. Instead their lives were worse than before. As a result, the introduction of the special autonomy system was a failure. The main reasons were the lack of understanding about the local situation and the inability of creating an effective policy that is fair among the local people. Besides, the absence of the mutual trust between the central government and the local government has become a barrier to effectively implement the policy. Therefore, there is a need to re-inspect the Papua’s special autonomy system.
참고문헌 (47)
- 소병국, "동남아의 지역주의와 종족갈등" (2004), 도서출판 오름
- 황대일, "특파원의 눈에 비친 인도네시아 만년설" (2003), 출판사미상
- Decki Natalis Pigay BIK, "Evolusi DeckiNasionalisme dan Sejarah Konflik Politik di Papua", pp.6~ (2000), Pustaka Sinar Harapan
- Departemen Dalam Negeri, "UU RI Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua", Departemen Dalam Negeri, ~ (2007)
- Djojosoekarto, Agung dkk, "Otonomi Khusus di Indonesia" (2008), Kemitraan
- West Papuan Demographic Transition and the 2010 Indonesian Census: ‘Slow Motion Genocide’ or not?, "Elmslie, Jim", The University of Sydney, ~, pp.11 (2010), 1
- F. J. F. van Hasselt, "Di Tanah Orang Papua" (2002), Yayasan Timotius Papua
- Giay, Benny, "Menuju Papua Baru (ke-3)", pp.2001, Deyai
- Giay, Benny, "Tanggapan Masyarakat Terhadap Peristiwa Penculikan dan Pembunuhan Theys H. Eluay 10 Nopember 2001", pp.2003, Deiyai
- Hadiz, Liza dkk, "Laporan Investigasi Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia di Timor Timur, Maluku, Tanjung Priok dan Papua 1999-2001" (2003), Publikasi Komnas HAM Perempuan
- Hosio, J. E., "Papua Barat dalam Realitas Politik NKRI" (2009), LBM
- Kambai, Yafet, "Gerakan Papua Merdeka di bawah bayang-bayang Mega-Haz" (2003), ELSHAM Papua
- Koentjaraningrat, "Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia (ke-20)" (2004), Djambatan
- Lagerberg, Kees, "West Irian and Jakarta Imperialism" (1980), St. Martins Press
- Mansoben, Josh Robert, "Sistem Politik Tradisional di Irian Jaya Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan", pp.1994
- Moh Yamin, "Kedaulatan Indonesia atas Irian Barat Yaitu Uraian tentang Tuntutan Rakyat terhadap Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat", pp.6~ (1956), Bukitinggi Jakarta-Medan
- N.g.J.van Schouwerburg, "Het Geesttelijk en Maatscchappelijk werk der Zending", Oost en West, November 1955, ~ (1955)
- Osborne, Robin, "Indonesia'Secret War: The Guerilla Struggle in Irian Jaya", pp.128~ (1985), Alllen & Unwin
- Purwanto, Wawan H., "Papua 100 Tahun ke Depan" (2010), CMB Press
- Rachmawati, Iva, "Papua Simpul Jamrud Khatulistiwa", Aswaja Pressindo
- Sekretaris Negara RI, "UU RI Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua" (2001), Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Papua
- Sumule, Agus, "Satu Setengah Tahun Otsus Papua" (2003), Yayasan Topang
- Suranto, Hanif, "Memoria Passionis di Papua Tahun 2006" (2008), SKP Jayapura
- Theo P.A. van den Broek, "Memoria Passionis di Papua: Kondisi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Gerakan Aspirasi Merdeka: Gambaran 1999" (2001), Sekretariat Keadilan dan Perdamaian&Lembaga Studi Pers dan Pembangunan
- Theo P.A. van den Broek, "Memoria Passionis di Papua: Kondisi Sosial-Politik dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2001" (2003), Sekretariat Keadilan dan Perdamaian Keuskupan Jayapura
- Usman MHD, Syafaruddin, "Pasang Surut Sejarah Papua dalam Pangkuan Ibu Pertiwi" (2010), Planet Buku
- Yusuf, Idris, "Biro Humas Setwilda Irian Jaya" (1998)
- Widjojo, Muridan S dkk, "Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, improving the Present and Securing the Future" (2009), LIPI
- "Dana Otsus 40 Trilyun, Rakyat Masih Kelaparan", Satu Papua, Edisi 02, 2014 (2013)
- Daud, Ameidyo, "Hatta: Dana Otsus Papua Rp 40 triliun sejak 2002", Sindonews, 2013, 05(검색일: 2014. 1. 4), pp.2014, ~
- Frans Maniagasi, "Renungan Pasca-Kongres Rakyat Papua", Media Indonesia, 22 Juni 2000(검색일: 2014. 1. 6), ~ (2014)
- Yoman, Socratez Sofyan, "Latar belakang otonomi khusus Papua, kegagalan dan solusinya", Bintang papua, 3 Agustus 2013(검색 일: 2014. 5. 22), ~ (2014)
- Anthonius Rahail, "전직국회의원 (2012", 07, pp.2012, ~
- Bernarda Meteray, "Jayapura의 국립 쩬드라와시 대학교 사회정치학 (FISIP UNCEN) 교수 (2012", 07, pp.2012, ~
- Chauvel, Richard, "School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Education and Human Development, Melbourne, Australia) 박사 (2012", 07[DOI]
- David Eston, "파푸아 Jayapura의 Sion Ministry 목사 (2012", 07, pp.2012, ~
- Julistiani, Anny, Kasubdit, "(kepala sub direktorat Otonomi Khusus Wilayah II), Direktorat Jenderal Otonomi Daerah, Kementerian Dalam Negeri, 내무부 제2구역 특별자치 부국장 (2012", 07, pp.2012, ~
- Suyanto, Isbodroini, "국립인도네시아대학교(UI) 사회정치학대학 (FISIP) 교수 (2012", 7, pp.2012, ~
- Thaha Moh. Alhamid, "Sekjen Presidium Dewan Papua(PDP) (2012", 07, pp.2012, ~
- Widjojo, Muridan S., "Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia(LIPI) 선임연구원 (2013", 07, pp.2013, ~