본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

태국의 최근 정치적 갈등: 그 평가와 전망

Recent Political Conflicts in Thailand: Their Evaluation and Prospect

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study is to evaluate political conflicts in Thailand after 2005 and their future. While the recent political conflicts are regarded as those between pro-Thaksin group, and anti-Thaksin group, the origins of the political conflicts are as follows:First, Thai political development in the past was often interrupted by military coups. Major political elites during the stage of military and bureaucratic control emerged not from political parties, but from the military organization. The fact that political parties were not the main provider of political elites continued for more than 50 years. Second, the linkage between political leaders and general public was loosened as all political parties were not formed centering around a handful of powerful political leaders. Third, political parties have consisted of diverse political groupings with heterogeneous memberships. Their organizational structure has been week fragmented, and undisciplined. They have aggregated a loose conglomeration of individuals, cliques, and factions, rather than organized or semi-organized interest groups upholding some common policy goals or program. Fourth, the general characteristics for traditional political culture are closely related to the development of politics as before today as follows : 1) authoritarianism: the fragility of infrastructure ; 2) social character of power-oriented: politics of vortex ; 3) collectivism, the lack of identification, strong personalism. Now, Thailand is experiencing the political change from the political regime's transformation and also a lot of restraints for the development of political development. In my opinion, nowadays Thailand is in a critical period. There is no other time in which people-based politics is of urgent ndevssity. If we fail in establishing the people-based politics, not only the internis of urgent will become more aggravated, but the existence and power utilization of Thailand also seem to be unclear. And then the democracy in Thailand may remain only in its name.

Abstract

This study is to evaluate political conflicts in Thailand after 2005 and their future. While the recent political conflicts are regarded as those between pro-Thaksin group, and anti-Thaksin group, the origins of the political conflicts are as follows:First, Thai political development in the past was often interrupted by military coups. Major political elites during the stage of military and bureaucratic control emerged not from political parties, but from the military organization. The fact that political parties were not the main provider of political elites continued for more than 50 years. Second, the linkage between political leaders and general public was loosened as all political parties were not formed centering around a handful of powerful political leaders. Third, political parties have consisted of diverse political groupings with heterogeneous memberships. Their organizational structure has been week fragmented, and undisciplined. They have aggregated a loose conglomeration of individuals, cliques, and factions, rather than organized or semi-organized interest groups upholding some common policy goals or program. Fourth, the general characteristics for traditional political culture are closely related to the development of politics as before today as follows : 1) authoritarianism: the fragility of infrastructure ; 2) social character of power-oriented: politics of vortex ; 3) collectivism, the lack of identification, strong personalism. Now, Thailand is experiencing the political change from the political regime's transformation and also a lot of restraints for the development of political development. In my opinion, nowadays Thailand is in a critical period. There is no other time in which people-based politics is of urgent ndevssity. If we fail in establishing the people-based politics, not only the internis of urgent will become more aggravated, but the existence and power utilization of Thailand also seem to be unclear. And then the democracy in Thailand may remain only in its name.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김홍구, "푸미폰 국왕의 역할. in: 태국의 이해" (2000), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
  2. 이병도, "태국 정당정치의 변동과 제도화 수준에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2000
  3. 이병도, "태국의 ‘짜오퍼(Chao Pho)’에 관한 연구", 동남아연구, 11(2) (2002)
  4. Aathan Buntam, "Awasan Rabob Taksin(탁씬체제의 종말)" (2006), Campus Press
  5. Anusorn Limmanee, "“Thailand” in Political Party System and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia. in: vol.1: Southeast Asia", pp.403~448 (1988), Ashgate
  6. Bunmi Tirayut, "Kanmuang Rabob Taksin (Thaksinocracy). in: Ru Tan Taksin(탁씬을 바로 알자)", pp.41~50 (2004), Ko Kit Duaykan Press
  7. Huntington, Samuel P, "Political Order in Changing Societies" (1968), Yale University Press
  8. Manirot Patom, "Anakot Kanmuang Thai nai Rabob Taksinomics(탁씬 경제체제 하에 태국정치의 미래). in: Pa Anakot Pratet Thai 2552(2009년 태국 미래의 해부)", pp.97~110 (2008), Tanmedia Network Press
  9. Mcvey Ruth, "Money and Power in Provincial Thailand" (2000), Nordic Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  10. Meo. Reo. Weo, "Rapipat Akin. “Rabob Upatam kab Kanmuang: Samai kitmai tammai Chumsak Pintong”(태국정치와 후견인제도: 새로운 사고, 새로운 개혁). in: Ru Tan Taksin(탁씬을 바로 알자)", pp.31~40 (2004), Ko Kit Duaykan Press
  11. Nogsuan Siripan, "Party Elities in the Business Conglomerate Model of Thai Political Parties. in: Eyes on Thai Democracy: National and Local Issues" (2006), Chulalongkorn University Printing House
  12. Pintong Chumsak, "Ru Tan Taksin(탁씬을 바로 알자)" (2004), Ko Kit Duaykan Press
  13. Piriyaranssan Sangsit, "Keorabchan Baeb Baetset(다양한 부패)" (2006), Ruam Duay Chuaikan Press
  14. Piriyaranssan Sangsit, "Korabchan Rabeob Taksin(탁씬제도의 부패)" (2006), Ruamduay Chuaykan Press
  15. Santasombat Yot, "Kanmuang Watanatham keong Ratchat nai Sangkhom Thai(태국사회에서 국가의 정치문화)" (2008), Sun Manusyawittaya Sirintorn
  16. Samudavanija Chaianan, "Trilakrat kab Kanmueng Thai(3차원의 국가와 태국 정치)" (2007), Institute of Public Policy Studies
  17. Sirisampan Kasem, "Taksin kab Prachatipatai nai Rabob Pakkanmuang(탁씬과 정당체제에서의 민주주의). in: Ru Tan Taksin(탁씬을 바로 알자)" (2004), Ko Kit Duaykan Press
  18. Wasi Prawet, "Rattaban Taksin kan Kwam Rab pit Cheb tang Prawatisat(탁씬정부와 역사적 책임). in: Ru Tan Taksin(탁씬을 바로 알자)" (2004), Ko Kit Duaykan Press
  19. Wongwipanon Pairot, "Anakot Kanmuang Thai(태국 정치의 미래)" (2004), Knowledge Plus Press
  20. Worapong Sombun, "Yut Ratabab(정부 장악)" (2006), Saitan Press
  21. "중앙일보. 13", 04, pp.2009 (2009), ~
  22. "Matichon Daily Newspaper(Thailand), 25 April 2009", ~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)