禪, 존재론적 평면화와 평등의 정치학
Seon: Ontological Planarization and the Politics of Equality
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I attempt to interpret the Chan/Seon/Zen doctrine of non-discrimination of good and evil from the perspective of the politics of equality. To break away from distinction is to detach oneself from one’s own measure for distinguishing between ‘good and evil’ and ‘liking and disliking.’ To distinguish based on measure is to exercise “the power of measure” (Deleuze/Guattari), and to break away from it is to jump off all Grund (foundation/ground) and plunge into the Abgrund (abyss, no ground). Through this act of departure, it becomes possible to arrive at the ‘ontological plane’ that binds together as an ensemble (tenir ensemble) such binaries as music and non-music, dance and non-dance, and so forth. This type of equality is in accordance with Rancière’s concept of politics in that it suggests equality between the qualified and the unqualified. Seon Buddhism thus implicates a radical ‘politics of equality’ that has gained an ontological status.
Abstract
In this article, I attempt to interpret the Chan/Seon/Zen doctrine of non-discrimination of good and evil from the perspective of the politics of equality. To break away from distinction is to detach oneself from one’s own measure for distinguishing between ‘good and evil’ and ‘liking and disliking.’ To distinguish based on measure is to exercise “the power of measure” (Deleuze/Guattari), and to break away from it is to jump off all Grund (foundation/ground) and plunge into the Abgrund (abyss, no ground). Through this act of departure, it becomes possible to arrive at the ‘ontological plane’ that binds together as an ensemble (tenir ensemble) such binaries as music and non-music, dance and non-dance, and so forth. This type of equality is in accordance with Rancière’s concept of politics in that it suggests equality between the qualified and the unqualified. Seon Buddhism thus implicates a radical ‘politics of equality’ that has gained an ontological status.
참고문헌 (18)
- 大珠, "禪林寶典", pp.167~226 (1988), 장경각
- 道原, "傳燈錄" (1987), 동국대 역경원
- 性徹, "禪林寶典" (1988), 장경각
- 圓悟, "碧巖錄" (1993), 장경각
- 圓悟, "圓悟心要" (1993), 장경각
- 이진경, "노마디즘", pp.709~731 (2002), 휴머니스트
- 이진경, "외부, 사유의 정치학" (2009), 그린비
- 臨濟, "臨濟錄·法眼錄" (1989), 장경각
- 趙州, "趙州錄" (1991), 장경각
- 慧能, "敦煌本 六祖壇經" (1988), 장경각
- 黃檗, "禪林寶典", pp.236~345 (1988), 장경각
- Ahir, D. C., "암베드카르" (2005), 코나투스
- Ambedkar, D. R., "인도로 간 붓다" (2005), 청미래
- Blanchot, M., "정치평론: 1593-1993" (2009), 그린비
- Deleuze, G., "차이와 반복" (2004), 민음사
- Deleuze, G., "Mille Plateaux" (1980), Minuit
- Heidegger, M., "동일성과 차이" (2000), 민음사
- Rancière, J., "정치적인 것의 가장자리에서" (2008), 길