본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

툴루세 시대의 바이오아트

Bioart in the Chthulucene

홍성욱|황정하
이화인문과학원 (Ewha Institute for the Humanities: EIH)|2021.04|탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities|제14권 제1호|pp. 79-116|DOI 10.22901/trans.2021.14.1.79

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

돌봄BiophilosophyCareBiotechnology생명공학도나 해러웨이Donna Haraway바이오아트툴루세바이오필로소피공동생성BioartChthuluceneSympoiesis
주제분류기타인문학

초록

인간의 활동으로 생물종이 멸종하고, 기후변화가 지구의 미래를 위협하는 21세기 위기의 시대를 우리는 어떻게 살아가야 하는가? 이러한 질문에 대해 페미니스트 과학기술학자 해러웨이(Donna Haraway)는 다양한 존재들과 새로운 종류의 관계 맺기를 통해 골칫거리들을 끌어안고 바로 내일의 미래를 상상해나가는 ‘툴루세’(Chthulucene) 개념을 그 답으로 제시한다. 본 연구는 생명을 복잡한 연결망 속에서 끊임없이 변화하는 과정으로 이해하는 철학자 태커(Eugene Thacker)의 바이오필로소피(biophilosophy)의 생명관과 이와 맥을 함께 하는 툴루세의 공동생성(sympoiesis)의 생명관을 통해 기존에 널리 알려진 바이오아트 작품 세 편을 재해석한다. 이러한 방식으로 바이오아트 작품들을 재조명해 보는 것은 바이오아트의 수행이 현대에 지니는 함의에 대한 더욱 풍부하고 실천적인 해석을 가능하게 할 것이다.

Abstract

How should we live in an era of crisis in the 21st century, when the extinction of species and climate change caused by human activities threaten the future of the planet? To these questions, a well-known feminist science studies scholar Donna Haraway presents the concept of the ‘Chthulucene’, which chooses to stay with troubles and imagines the future of tomorrow by shaping new kinds of relationships with various human beings, animals, and non-human beings. This paper tries to reinterpret three well-known bioart works by using an insight of ‘biophilosophy’ of the philosopher Eugene Thacker, which understands life as a process that constantly changes in a complex network, as well as the sympoietic view of life of the Chthulucene. This re-examination of bioart works will bring a richer and more practical interpretation of contemporary bioart.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. 신승철, "생명윤리의 저편? 바이오 아트의 비판적 실천", 현대미술사연구, (33), pp.167~198 (2013), 현대미술사학회[DOI]
  2. 신진환, "인류세와 지속가능한 생존", 윤리연구, 1(124), pp.159~180 (2019), 한국윤리학회[DOI]
  3. 이소요, "관리, 돌봄, 배려 - 예술 속 생물 미디어 사례를 중심으로", 한국영상학회논문집, 15(3), pp.59~73 (2017), 한국영상학회[DOI]
  4. 전혜숙, "생명의 감시와통제를 비판하는 바이오아트", 미술이론과 현장, (21), pp.158~189 (2016), 한국미술이론학회[DOI]
  5. 홍성욱, "포스트휴먼 오디세이" (2019), 휴머니스트
  6. Irigaray, L, "식물의 사유: 식물 존재에 관한 두 철학자의 대화" (2020), 알렙
  7. Baker, S., "Artist Animal", pp.227~239 (2012), University of Minnesota Press
  8. Baker, S., "We Have Always Been Transgenic", AI & Society, 20(1), pp.35~48 (2006)
  9. Bar-On, Y. M., "The Biomass Distribution on Earth", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25), pp.6506~6511 (2018)
  10. Becker, C., "GFP Bunny", Art Journal, 59(3), pp.45~47 (2000)
  11. Blok, V., "Earthing Technology: Towards an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene", Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal, 21(2), pp.114~126 (2017)
  12. Blocker, J., "Seeing Witness: Visuality and the Ethics of Testimony", pp.87~102 (2009), University of Minnesota Press
  13. Byerley, A, "Biotech Aesthetics: Exploring the Practice of Bio Art", Culture and Organization, 21(3), pp.197~216 (2015)
  14. Catts, O., "Growing Semi-Living Structures: Concepts and Practices for the Use of Tissue Technologies for Non-Medical Purposes", Architectural Design, 78(6), pp.30~35 (2008)
  15. Catts, O., "The Vitality of Matter and the Instrumentalisation of Life", Architectural Design, 83(1), pp.70~75 (2013)
  16. Chapple, B., "Second Nature:Origins and Originality in Art, Science, and New Media", pp.59~76 (2011), AXL Books
  17. Crutzen, P. J., "The ‘Anthropocene’", Global Change Newsletter, 41, pp.17~18 (2000)
  18. Davis, J., "Anthropocene, Capitalocene, … Plantationocene?: A Manifesto for Ecological Justice in an Age of Global Crises", Geography Compass, 13(5), pp.e12438~ (2019)
  19. Desai, S., "Haste and Waste in the City: Rekindling Care About and For Trees in Another Time", Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 43(1), pp.165~195 (2017)
  20. de La Bellacasa, M. P., "Touching Technologies, Touching Visions : The Reclaiming of Sensorial Experience and the Politics of Speculative Thinking", Subjectivity, 28(1), pp.297~315 (2009)
  21. de La Bellacasa, M. P., "Matters of Care in Technoscience : Assembling Neglected Things", Social Studies of Science, 41(1), pp.85~106 (2011)
  22. de La Bellacasa, M. P., "Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds" (2017), University of Minnesota Press
  23. Dixon, D. P., "The Blade and the Claw : Science, Art and the Creation of the Lab-borne Monster", Social & Cultural Geography, 9(6), pp.671~692 (2008)
  24. Driessen, C. P. G., "Key Thinkers on Cities", pp.141~146 (2017), Sage Publications
  25. Dumitriu A., "Cybernetic Bacteria 2.0", Leonardo, 44(3), pp.264~265 (2011)
  26. Gigliotti, C., "Leonardo’s Choice : the Ethics of Artists Working with Genetic Technologies", AI & Society, 20(1), pp.22~34 (2006)
  27. Haraway, D. J, "The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness" (2003), Prickly Paradigm Press
  28. Human, "Queering the Non", pp.2008, Haraway, D. J.
  29. Haraway, D. J., "Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin", Environmental Humanities, 6(1), pp.159~165 (2015)
  30. Haraway, D, "Staying with the Trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene" (2016), Duke University Press
  31. Harbers, H., "Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms", pp.141~170 (2010), Transcript Verlag
  32. Harthoorn, K., "Critical Bioart and Postcapitalist Ethics", Philosophical Readings, 11(1), pp.17~25 (2019)
  33. Houdebine, L. M., "Impacts of Genetically Modified Animals on the Ecosystem and Human Activities", Global Bioethics, 25(1), pp.3~18 (2014)
  34. Origins Special Issue: Bio, "Synnt", pp.Jagodzinski, J., Art
  35. Kac, E., "GFP Bunny", Leonardo, 36(2), pp.97~102 (2003)
  36. Lovelock, J. E., "Gaia as Seen Through the Atmosphere", Atmospheric Environment, 6(8), pp.579~580 (1972)
  37. Lovelock, J. E., "Atmospheric Dimethyl Sulphide and the Natural Sulphur Cycle", Nature, 237, pp.452~453 (1972)
  38. Lovelock, J. E, "Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth" (1979), Oxford University Press
  39. Lovelock, J, "The Revenge of Gaia: Earth’s Climate Crisis and the Fate of Humanity" (2006), Basic Books
  40. Lynch, L., "Culturing the Pleebland: The Idea of the “Public” in Genetic Art", Literature and Medicine, 26(1), pp.180~206 (2007)
  41. Machado, A., "The Eighth Day: The Transgenic Art of Eduardo Kac", pp.87~95 (2003), Institute for Studies in the Arts, Arizona State University
  42. Margulis, L, "The Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution" (1998), Basic Books
  43. McHugh, S., "Real Artificial: Tissue-cultured Meet, Genetically Modified Farm Animals, and Fictions", Configurations, 18(1), pp.181~197 (2010)
  44. Mindell, D. P., "The Tree of Life: Metaphor, Model, and Heuristic Device", Systematic Biology, 62, pp.479~489 (2013)
  45. Mitchell, R, "Bioart and the Vitality of Media" (2010), University of Washington Press
  46. Mol, A., "Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms" (2010), Transcript Verlag
  47. Montagnino, F. M., "Joseph Beuys’ Rediscovery of Man-Nature Relationship: A Pinoeering Experience of Open Social Innovation", Journal of Open Innovation:Technology, Market, and Complexity, pp.66~82 (2018)
  48. Moore, J. W., "Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism", pp.1~11 (2016), PM Press
  49. Moser, I., "Making Alzheimer’s Disease Matter: Enacting, Interfering, Doing Politics of Nature", Geoforum, 39(1), pp.98~110 (2008)
  50. Palladino, P., "Picturing the Messianic: Agamben and Titian’s The Nymph and the Shepherd", Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), pp.94~109 (2010)
  51. Scholz, N., "Joseph Beuys: 7000 Oaks in Kassel", Anthos: Zeitschrift für Landschaftsarchitektur, 25, pp.31~35 (1986)
  52. Senior, A., "Relics of Bioart: Ethics and Messianic Aesthetics in Performance Documentation", Theatre Journal, 66(2), pp.183~205 (2014)
  53. Shcheglovitova, M., "Valuing Plants in Devalued Spaces: Caring for Baltimore’s Street trees", Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(1), pp.228~245 (2020)
  54. Stracey, F., "Bio-art: The Ethics Behind the Aesthetics", Nature Review Molecular Cell Biology, 10, pp.496~500 (2009)
  55. Strauss, D. L., "Beuys in Ireland: 7000 Oaks on the Hill of Uisneach", Alternatives:Global, Local, Political, 31(1), pp.101~104 (2006)
  56. Thacker, E, "The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture" (2005), MIT Press
  57. Thacker, E, "Critical Digital Studies: A reader", pp.132~142 (2008), University of Toronto Press
  58. Thacker, E, "Creative Biotechnology: A User’s Manual" (2004), L+ Publishing
  59. Tomasula, S., "Genetic Art and the Aesthetics of Biology", Leonardo, 35(2), pp.137~144 (2002)
  60. Vaage, N. S., "What Ethics for Bioart?", Nanoethics, 10(1), pp.87~104 (2016)
  61. Vaage, N. S., "Fringe Biotechnology", BioSocieties, 12(1), pp.109~131 (2017)
  62. Weintraub, L., "Curator - Anthropologist", Ethnographer - Artist: Katherine Carl and Natalie Jeremijenko Interviewed by Linda Weintraub, 2015, pp.17(1), 198~217
  63. Yi, D, "The Recombinant University: Genetic Engineering and the Emergence of Stanford Biotechnology" (2015), University of Chicago Press
  64. Zurr, I., "The Ethical Claims of Bio Art: Killing the Other or Selfcannibalism?", Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art, 5(1), pp.167~188 (2004)
  65. Zylinska, J., "Ethics and the Arts", pp.191~200 (2014), Springer
  66. "OneTree" (2000)[URL]
  67. "GFP Bunny" (2000)[URL]
  68. "Bio Art" (2009)[URL]
  69. "Society’s Signposts / Natalie Jeremijenko’s Trees Aren’t Simply Decorative —They Can Be Read Like a Social Register" (2004)[URL]
  70. "OneTrees: The forgotten tree art project" (2014)[URL]
  71. "Eduardo Kac’s GFP Bunny, a Work of Transgenic Art, or, It’s Not Easy Being Green" (2000)[URL]
  72. "the tissue culture & art project"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

에코페미니즘 관점에서 본 해러웨이 인구론의 (탈)정치성박혜영한국영미문학페미니즘학회 · 영미문학페미니즘2023 · 제31권 제1호D. 해러웨이의 다종적 생태정치: ‘함께-되기’와 ‘응답-능력’을 중심으로현남숙한국여성철학회 · 한국여성철학2021 · 제35권 도나 해러웨이의 생태학적 사상: 『트러블과 함께하기』를 중심으로김용규, 권요안나영어권문화연구소 · 영어권문화연구2024 · 제17권 제3호생명에 대한 새로운 이해: 미생물을 이용하는 바이오아트를 중심으로전혜숙미술사학연구회 · 미술사학보2017 · 제48호인류세 시대의 미술교육: 인간과 비인간 사이 관계성으로서의 예술류지영한국조형교육학회 · 조형교육2019 · 제71호바이오 아트와 신체의 미래신승철한국영상문화학회 · 영상문화2020 · 제37호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

테크노사이언스의 시대, 페미니스트 과학학의 유산: 해러웨이의 ‘상황적 지식들’의 생태론적 의미김애령pp. 7-29섹스로봇과 상징적 재현의 문제신상규pp. 31-53근대 일본 여성운동에서의 생명주의와 우생학: 『세이토(青鞜)』의 섹슈얼리티 정치학을 중심으로김병진pp. 55-77추모 박물관 그리고 현대소비사회: “가장 악의적”인 공간 속 “붕괴”에 관하여차지민pp. 117-137‘시천주’와 ‘불연기연’의 도덕교육적 시사점 연구: ‘도덕과(道德科) 교육과정’의 목표와 원리를 중심으로김민재pp. 139-165
원문 보기