소통, 그 불가능성의 가능성
Communication, the Possibility of Impossibility
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I propose a new model for the possibility of equality in communication, and attempt to develop humanistic ideas about it. With regard to matters of communication, there is a theoretical project to secure the normativity of communication relying on universality in language activity, on the one hand, but there is criticism from the social sciences that emphasis on universal normativity may be too idealy, tic and give rise to an illusion of communication concealyng the existing inequality, on the other hand. The science of communication has analyzed and described precisely the causes of inequality from a critical viewpoint. Another approach to the matter of communication is to pursue economic equality based on the image of family or of one body, and thereby to secure equality in communication. However, such an image makes difficult the prevention of totalitarian hierarchization and closedness of community. Against such, the ethics of the Other or the ethic of hospitality is also proposed, but such proposals tend to restrict the matter to the realm of ethics, excluding a political approach.
Abstract
In this paper, I propose a new model for the possibility of equality in communication, and attempt to develop humanistic ideas about it. With regard to matters of communication, there is a theoretical project to secure the normativity of communication relying on universality in language activity, on the one hand, but there is criticism from the social sciences that emphasis on universal normativity may be too idealy, tic and give rise to an illusion of communication concealyng the existing inequality, on the other hand. The science of communication has analyzed and described precisely the causes of inequality from a critical viewpoint. Another approach to the matter of communication is to pursue economic equality based on the image of family or of one body, and thereby to secure equality in communication. However, such an image makes difficult the prevention of totalitarian hierarchization and closedness of community. Against such, the ethics of the Other or the ethic of hospitality is also proposed, but such proposals tend to restrict the matter to the realm of ethics, excluding a political approach.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강영안, "타인의 얼굴" (2005), 문학과지성사
- 고병권, "니체, 천 개의 눈, 천 개의 길" (2001), 소명출판
- 김비환, "아렌트의 ‘정치적’ 헌정주의", 한국정치학회보, 41(2), pp.99~120 (2007), 한국정치학회
- 김선욱, "정치와 진리" (2001), 책세상
- 김선욱, "한나 아렌트의 정치 개념―“정치적”인 것과 “사회적”인 것의 관계를중심으로", 철학, 67, pp.221~239 (2001)
- 김선욱, "하버마스 언어철학의 전체론적 특성", 사회와 철학, (10), pp.65~89 (2005), 한국사회와철학연구회
- 김수환, "전체성과 그 잉여들: 문화기호학과 정치철학을 중심으로", 사회와 철학, (18), pp.71~98 (2009), 한국사회와철학연구회
- 김항, "말하는 입, 먹는 입" (2009), 새물결
- 발터 벤야민, "일방통행로" (2007), 새물결
- "신약성서"
- 이화인문과학원, "젠더와 탈경계의 지형" (2009), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 이진경, "외부, 사유의 정치학" (2009), 그린비
- 자크 랑시에르, "정치적인 것의 가장자리에서" (2008), 길
- 장윤재, "세계화 시대의 기독교 신학" (2009), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 정호근, "하버마스의 사상" (1996), 나남출판사
- 조르조 아감벤, "목적없는 수단" (2009), 난장
- 조지 세이빈, "정치사상사1" (1997), 한길사
- "17년 8개월"[URL]
- 진은영, "숭고의 윤리에서 미학의 정치로 ―자크 랑시에르의 미학의 정치―", 시대와 철학, 20(3), pp.403~437 (2009), 한국철학사상연구회
- 피에르 부르디외, "재생산" (2000), 동문선
- 한나 아렌트, "인간의 조건" (1996), 한길사
- 한나 아렌트, "전체주의의 기원1" (2006), 한길사
- 황정아, "묻혀버린 질문: ‘윤리’에 관한 비평과 외국이론 수용의 문제", 창작과비평, (144), pp.100~120 (2009)
- Jameson, Fredric., "Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism" (1992), Duke University Press
- Lincoln, Bruce., "Discourse and the Construction of Society" (1989), Oxford University Press
- Rancière, Jacques., "Thinking between Disciplines : An Aesthetics of Knowledge", Parrhesia, 1, pp.1~12 (2006)