본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

언어적 소통의 일반 모형

Toward a General Model of Linguistic Communication

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

From the first of the 20th century, many attempts have been made to investigate the linguistic communication in several fields, not only in linguistic philosophy also in informatics and social sciences. Studies in the field of pragmatics and discourse analysis have been added to the list from the middle 20th century, but we still cannot say that we have overall perspective on the linguistic communication as it partially was given by the Jakobson's model. Diverse aspects of realization of communication have not been fully and systematically explained in their relationship with social archetypes, either. Most seriously, current model of linguistic communication does not consider the dynamic polyphony and intersubjectivity of the communication, mainly following traditional academic traditions. Their main concerns were only the two questions; “Who said what?” and “How and to whom is the sentence interpreted?” This is the reason why we need to establish a new general model of linguistic communication. This paper aims to establish a new linguistic communicative model to describe efficiently the dialogic dynamism, on which linguistic communication is fundamentally based. We devide the communication space into two substrata - constructive and practical spaces - and they are again subsumed into two levels - inner and outer levels. We especially focus on the existences of the subjects of communications and their dynamic relations in diverse levels of communication. In establishing a general model of linguistic communication, we also notice the importance of discrimination between the potentia and realia as methodological concepts for understanding the nature of the dynamic relationship. Intersubjectivity functions very dynamically in the interaction between potentia as the level of construction of the model and realia as the level of practices of constituents of the model. This presupposes multilateral communicative spaces and relations among the subjects of linguistic communication. These multilateral spaces and relations cover the orientations, genres, scopes, and systems of the discourse. We can conclude that the dynamism of communication is the matter of dynamic relations between subjects in the process of communications.

Abstract

From the first of the 20th century, many attempts have been made to investigate the linguistic communication in several fields, not only in linguistic philosophy also in informatics and social sciences. Studies in the field of pragmatics and discourse analysis have been added to the list from the middle 20th century, but we still cannot say that we have overall perspective on the linguistic communication as it partially was given by the Jakobson's model. Diverse aspects of realization of communication have not been fully and systematically explained in their relationship with social archetypes, either. Most seriously, current model of linguistic communication does not consider the dynamic polyphony and intersubjectivity of the communication, mainly following traditional academic traditions. Their main concerns were only the two questions; “Who said what?” and “How and to whom is the sentence interpreted?” This is the reason why we need to establish a new general model of linguistic communication. This paper aims to establish a new linguistic communicative model to describe efficiently the dialogic dynamism, on which linguistic communication is fundamentally based. We devide the communication space into two substrata - constructive and practical spaces - and they are again subsumed into two levels - inner and outer levels. We especially focus on the existences of the subjects of communications and their dynamic relations in diverse levels of communication. In establishing a general model of linguistic communication, we also notice the importance of discrimination between the potentia and realia as methodological concepts for understanding the nature of the dynamic relationship. Intersubjectivity functions very dynamically in the interaction between potentia as the level of construction of the model and realia as the level of practices of constituents of the model. This presupposes multilateral communicative spaces and relations among the subjects of linguistic communication. These multilateral spaces and relations cover the orientations, genres, scopes, and systems of the discourse. We can conclude that the dynamism of communication is the matter of dynamic relations between subjects in the process of communications.

참고문헌 (77)

  1. 강길호, "커뮤니케이션과 인간" (1995), 한나래
  2. 맥퀘일, "커뮤니케이션 모델" (1988), 나남
  3. 야콥슨, "문학 속의 언어학" (1989), 문학과 지성사
  4. 이기웅, "러시아 기능문체론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 러시아 문학, 17, pp.6~190 (1995)
  5. 이기웅, "자연언어 의미 기술의 문제점과 전망", 언어학, 30, pp.167~184 (2001), 한국언어학회
  6. 이기웅, "텍스트화와 러시아 언어-문화 공간의 토포스:러시아어 “프라브다” 토포스를 중심으로", 러시아연구, 17(2), pp.241~268 (2007), 러시아연구소
  7. 이동은, "Goffman 이론의 재고찰과 토론의 상호작용사회언어학적 분석", 언어학, 37, pp.197~222 (2003), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  8. 이두원, "기호 현상학적 휴먼 커뮤니케이션 모델 구축을 위한 이론적 연구", 한국언론학보, 35, pp.71~105 (1995)
  9. 송호근, "칼 만하임의 지식 사회학 연구" (1990), 홍성사
  10. 지크프리트, "미디어 인식론: 인지-텍스트-커뮤니케이션" (1996), 까치
  11. 피스크, "커뮤니케이션학이란 무엇인가" (2001), 커뮤니케이션 북스
  12. Alpatov, V. M, "Vološnov, Baxtin i lingvistika, Moskva", ~ (2005)
  13. Austin,J, "How to Do Things with Words" (1962), Harvard University Press
  14. Bally,Ch, "Liguistique générale et linguistique française" (1932), Francke
  15. Bally,Ch, "Taité de stylistique française, 3ème éd" (1951), Klincksieck
  16. Baxtin, M. M, "Marksizm i filosofia jazyka" (1929), Leningrad
  17. Baxtin,M.M, "Sobranie cočnenij, t. 5, Moskva", 159~286 (1997)
  18. Bell,A, "Language Style as audience design", Language in Society, 13, pp.145~204 (1984)
  19. Berlo,D, "The Process of Communication", ~ (1960)
  20. Bernstein, Basil, "Class, Codes and Control 1: Theoretical Studies towards a Sociology of Language" (1971), Routledge & Kegan Paul
  21. Brown,G, "Speakers, Listeners and Communication" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  22. Bühler,K, "Sprachtheorie" (1934), Jena
  23. Cherry,C, "On Human Communication", ~ (1957)
  24. Chomsky,N, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax", The MIT Press, ~ (1965)
  25. Clark H.H, "Using Language" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  26. Dance,F.E.X, "A Helical Model of Communication, Human Communication" (1967), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  27. Daneš,F, "Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective" (1974), Academia
  28. Davis,W, "Implicature: Intention, Convention and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  29. Ducrot,O, "Le structuralisme en linguistique" (1968), Seuil
  30. Ducrot,O, "Dire et ne pas dire" (1972), Hermann
  31. Ducrot,O, "Les Échelles argumentatives" (1980), Minuit
  32. Ducrot,O, "Le Dire et le dit" (1984), Minuit
  33. Gerbner,G, "Toward a General Model of Communication", Audio Visual Communication Review, 4(3), pp.171~199 (1956)
  34. Goffman,E, "The Neglected Situation", American Anthropologist, 66(6), pp.133~137 (1964)
  35. Goffman E, "Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience" (1974), Harper and Row
  36. Replies and Responses, "Goffman,E", ~, pp.46-7 (1975)
  37. Goffman,E, "Forms of Talk" (1981), University of Pennsylvania Press
  38. Grice,H.P, "Meaning", Philosophical Review, 67, pp.377~388 (1957)
  39. Grice,H.P, "Logic and Conversation. In: Speech Acts" (1967), Academic Press
  40. Grize,J.-B, "Logique et langage" (1990), OPHRYS
  41. Gumperz,J.J, "Types of Linguistic Communities", Anthropological Linguistics, 4, pp.28~36 (1962)
  42. Gumperz, J. J, "Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication" (1972), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  43. Halliday,M.A.K, "System and Function in Language" (1976), Oxford University Press
  44. Halliday,M.A.K, "Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning" (1978), Edward Arnold
  45. Hocker, J, "Interpersonal Conflict, 3rd ed" (1991), Wm. C. Brown Publisher
  46. Husserl,E, "Logische Untersuchungen II", pp.6~ (1901), Max Niemeyer
  47. Hymes,D, "On Communicative Competence. In: Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings" (2000), Penguin
  48. Hymes,D, "Vers la compétence de communication" (1984), Hatier-Crédif
  49. Jakobson,R, "Linguistics and Poetics, Selected Writings III" (1960), Mouton
  50. Jakobson,R, "Linguistics and Communication Theory, Selected Writings II" (1961), Mouton
  51. Jameson,F, "The Prison-House of Language" (1972), Princeton University Press
  52. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C, "L'énonciation de la Subjectivité dans le Langage, Coll. Linguistique" (1980), Armand Colin
  53. Kerbrat-Orecchioni,C, "Les Interactions Verbales" (1990), A. Collin
  54. Lagopoulos,A.P, "A Global Model of Communication", Semiotica, 131(1), pp.45~78 (2000)
  55. Levinson,S.C, "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  56. Lévi-Strauss, Cl, "Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté" (1949), Plon
  57. Lévi-Strauss,Cl, "Structural Anthropology" (1963), Penguin Books
  58. Lič,Ė, "Kul'tura i kommunikacija", ~ (2001)
  59. Mulder, J. W. F, "Theory of the Linguistic Sign" (1972), Mouton
  60. Newcomb,M, "An Approach to the Study of Communicative Acts, Communication and Culture: Readings in the Codes of Human Interaction" (1966), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  61. Osgood,C, "The Measurement of Meaning" (1967), University of Illinois Press
  62. Piaget,J, "Le structuralisme" (1968), PUF
  63. Robey, D, "Structuralism: An Introduction" (1973), Oxford University Press
  64. Saussure,F.de, "Cours de linguistique générale" (1916), Payot
  65. Schiffrin,D, "Approaches to Discourse" (1994), Blackwell
  66. Searle,J.R, "Expression and Meaning" (1979), Cambridge University Press
  67. Shannon, C, "The Mathematical Theory of Communication" (1949), University of Illinois Press
  68. Schramm, W, "How Communication Works. In: The Process and Effects of Mass Communication" (1954), University Illinois Press
  69. Sperber, D, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Harvard University Press
  70. Thomas J.A, "The Dynamics of Discourse: a Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction", 박사, pp.1986
  71. van Dijk, T, "Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 1", Academic Press
  72. Vinogradov,V.V, "Itogi obsuženija voprosov stilistiki, Voprosy jazykoznanija 1", ~ (1955)
  73. Vinogradov,V.V, "Stilistika. Teorija poėtičeskoj reč'. Poėtika, Moskva", ~ (1963)
  74. Wahl, F, "Qu'est-ce-que le structuralisme?" (1968), Seuil
  75. Weaver,W, "The Mathematics of Communication, Communication and Culture: Readings in the Codes of Human Interaction" (1966), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  76. Wittgenstein,L, "Philosophical Investigations" (1953), Blackwell
  77. Zolotova, G. A, "Kommunikativnaja grammatika russkogo jazyka", Moskva., ~ (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)