신체론으로서의 감각론: 스피노자의 물음 ‘신체는 무엇을 할 수 있는가’에 대한 들뢰즈의 답변
Theory of Sensation as Theory of Body: Deleuze’s Answer to Spinoza’s Question: What Can Our Bodies Do?
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to reconstitute the answer of Deleuze and Guattari to Spinoza’s question (“What can our bodies do?”) and to properly situate their theory of sensation as an answer to this question. Their theory of sensation is basically an extension of their ethical project, ethology. In their view, ethology means the study of the body’s ability of composition and modification. But normally, it is difficult for us to concretely feel and understand compositions and modifications. To do this, we require a type of transcendental practice of our sensations. In my opinion, their theory of sensation shows this transcendental practice. The core of their theory of sensation is to distinguish two pairs of concepts, perception/percept and affection/affect, and to accept only percept and affect as the two constituents of sensation. Percept and affect are the genetic elements of our ordinary perception and affection. Deleuze and Guattari consider a work of art as a block of percepts and affects. According to them, a work of art is a special body that modifies our bodies, and it makes us reach percepts and affects. In this sense, for Deleuze and Guattari, a work of art is considered an effective means for transcendental practice of our sensation.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to reconstitute the answer of Deleuze and Guattari to Spinoza’s question (“What can our bodies do?”) and to properly situate their theory of sensation as an answer to this question. Their theory of sensation is basically an extension of their ethical project, ethology. In their view, ethology means the study of the body’s ability of composition and modification. But normally, it is difficult for us to concretely feel and understand compositions and modifications. To do this, we require a type of transcendental practice of our sensations. In my opinion, their theory of sensation shows this transcendental practice. The core of their theory of sensation is to distinguish two pairs of concepts, perception/percept and affection/affect, and to accept only percept and affect as the two constituents of sensation. Percept and affect are the genetic elements of our ordinary perception and affection. Deleuze and Guattari consider a work of art as a block of percepts and affects. According to them, a work of art is a special body that modifies our bodies, and it makes us reach percepts and affects. In this sense, for Deleuze and Guattari, a work of art is considered an effective means for transcendental practice of our sensation.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김재인, "들뢰즈의 스피노자 연구에서 윅스퀼의 위상", 철학 논구, 36, pp.191~232 (2008)
- 김재인, "들뢰즈의 미학에서 ‘감각들의 블록’으로서의 예술 작품", 한국미학회 춘계학술대회 발표논문 (2013)
- 들뢰즈, "스피노자의 철학" (1999), 민음사
- 들뢰즈, "주름, 라이프니츠와 바로크" (2004), 문학과 지성사
- 로장발롱, 제롬, "들뢰즈와 가타리의 무한속도 1권" (2012), 열린책들
- 이찬웅, "들뢰즈의 영화 미학에서 정서의 문제 — 변용에서 시간으로", 美學(미학), (69), pp.151~179 (2012), 한국미학회
- 이찬웅, "들뢰즈의 회화론: 감각의 논리란 무엇인가", 美學(미학), (71), pp.105~145 (2012), 한국미학회
- 진태원, "스피노자 철학에 대한 관계론적 해석" (2006), 서울대학교
- 진태원, "정신적 자동장치란 무엇인가? - 데카르트, 스피노자, 들뢰즈 -", 철학논집, 28, pp.119~148 (2012), 철학연구소
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Spinoza et le problème de l’expression" (1968), Minuit
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Spinoza. Philosophie pratique" (1981), Minuit
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Le pli, Leibniz et le baroque" (1988), Minuit
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Mille Plateaux" (1980), Minuit
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Qu’est-ce que la philosophie ?" (1991), Minuit
- Descartes, René, "OEuvres de Descartes XI" (1984), Vrin
- Macherey, Pierre, "Deleuze: A Critical Reader" (1996), Blackwell
- Spinoza, Baruch, "OEuvres Ⅳ. Traduction et notes par Charles Appuhn" (1966), Garnier-Frammarion
- Spinoza, Baruch, "Éthique" (2010), Seuil
- Uexküll, Jacob von, "Mondes animaux et monde humain" (1965), Gonthier
- Woolf, Virginia, "The Diary of Virginia Woolf" (1984), Harcourt
- Woolf, Virginia, "The Common Reader First Series" (2012), Green Light Press