본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

스피노자(B. Spinoza)의 심신일원론에 근거한 무용에서의 신체와 표현의 의미

Meanings of Body and Expression in Dance Art Based on Spinoza’ Body-mind monism

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무용

초록

The paper attempts to interpret meanings of body and expression in dancing art through Spinoza’'s body-mind monism. Dance art hasn’'t been a major topic in discussions of philosophy of art and general aesthetics for a long time due to men’'s body identity. Further, at the bottom of this criticism, there is mind-body dualism that divided men’'s mind and body in dichotomy. Hence, the paper poses a question on the notion that dancing art through men’'s body hasn’'t been justifiably credited of its artistic value due to these criteria based on mind-body dualism. Further, as a refutation, the paper based philosophical progression of Spinoza’'s body-mind monism, and through this, the paper discussed how meanings of body and expression in dancing art are produced and how they’'re to be interpreted. One can divide characteristics of the Spinoza’'s body that the paper examined into largely three parts. First, Spinoza’'s body has equivalence to mind. This becomes apparent in the system of his body-mind monism that develops the notion that world is composed of various aspects that express the essence of an entity. Moreover, this existential equivalence of body and mind shows that they possess epistemological isonomie as well. On this, second, Spinoza’'s body and mind are situated in equivalent position and each of their expressions combine to form and express ideation about the entity. Lastly, third, men’'s body, through transfiguration and relationship with the other, can reach voluntary manifestation of conatus that sustains the essence of the existence, and this implies the possibility of enhancing and developing the ability of existence. As can be known also from Hegel’'s criticism, Spinoza’'s philosophy is a philosophy of affirmation, which doesn’'t embody negativity. Further, within this atmosphere of affirmation, men’'s cogitation and body can each be credited of its equivalence and interchanged. With this background, the place men’'s body can develop their existential ability is the state of beatitude and dominion of the genuine freedom that men can enjoy, where Spinoza wanted to reach. The author hopes that the paper based on Spinoza’'s philosophical thought can be something for the dance art to stand on for its pursuit of beatitude and freedom.

Abstract

The paper attempts to interpret meanings of body and expression in dancing art through Spinoza’'s body-mind monism. Dance art hasn’'t been a major topic in discussions of philosophy of art and general aesthetics for a long time due to men’'s body identity. Further, at the bottom of this criticism, there is mind-body dualism that divided men’'s mind and body in dichotomy. Hence, the paper poses a question on the notion that dancing art through men’'s body hasn’'t been justifiably credited of its artistic value due to these criteria based on mind-body dualism. Further, as a refutation, the paper based philosophical progression of Spinoza’'s body-mind monism, and through this, the paper discussed how meanings of body and expression in dancing art are produced and how they’'re to be interpreted. One can divide characteristics of the Spinoza’'s body that the paper examined into largely three parts. First, Spinoza’'s body has equivalence to mind. This becomes apparent in the system of his body-mind monism that develops the notion that world is composed of various aspects that express the essence of an entity. Moreover, this existential equivalence of body and mind shows that they possess epistemological isonomie as well. On this, second, Spinoza’'s body and mind are situated in equivalent position and each of their expressions combine to form and express ideation about the entity. Lastly, third, men’'s body, through transfiguration and relationship with the other, can reach voluntary manifestation of conatus that sustains the essence of the existence, and this implies the possibility of enhancing and developing the ability of existence. As can be known also from Hegel’'s criticism, Spinoza’'s philosophy is a philosophy of affirmation, which doesn’'t embody negativity. Further, within this atmosphere of affirmation, men’'s cogitation and body can each be credited of its equivalence and interchanged. With this background, the place men’'s body can develop their existential ability is the state of beatitude and dominion of the genuine freedom that men can enjoy, where Spinoza wanted to reach. The author hopes that the paper based on Spinoza’'s philosophical thought can be something for the dance art to stand on for its pursuit of beatitude and freedom.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 르네 데카르트, "철학의 원리" (2002), 아카넷
  2. 스피노자, "에티카" (1990), 서광사
  3. 오병남, "미학강의" (2007), 서울대학교출판부
  4. 이진경, "철학하는 굴뚝청소부" (2006), 그린비
  5. J.B. 알터, "무용: 그 실제와 이론- 18명의 무용이론에 대한 비판적 분석" (1997), 예전사
  6. John Martin, "The Modern Dance" (1933), Dance Horizons
  7. S.H. Lonsdale, "Dance and Ritual Play in Greek Religion" (1993), The Johns Hopkins University Press
  8. 김말복, "무용예술의 정체성에 대한 고찰", 미학, 20, pp.73~114 (1995), 한국미학회
  9. 김말복, "몸과 춤", 무용예술학연구, 20(20), pp.1~53 (2007), 한국무용예술학회
  10. 김성미, "Hegel 예술사상에 관한 연구", 대한무용학회지, 18, pp.37~51 (1995), 대한무용학회
  11. 김익현, "스피노자 철학에서의 정신과 신체의 관계", 인문과학논총, 35, pp.229~242 (2000), 건국대학교인문과학연구소
  12. 김현, "헤겔의 스피노자 해석(Ⅰ)", 범한철학, 42(3), pp.161~189 (2006), 범한철학회
  13. 박삼열, "스피노자의 심신론", 철학연구, 53, pp.137~158 (2001), 철학연구회
  14. 유연경, "스피노자『윤리학』의 미학적 독해를 위한 예비적 고찰 -지복의 조건으로서의 정서와 욕망에 관한 이론을 중심으로", 석사, 미학과문학, pp.2000
  15. 이소현, "무용에서의 신체의 미적 체험 : 현상학적 이해", 움직임의 철학 : 한국체육철학회지, 12(1), pp.359~380 (2004), 한국체육철학회
  16. 이진이, "플라톤의 우주적 무용의 개념에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1999

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)