프랑스인들의 한글에 대한 인식 고찰
Study of French Understanding on Hangul
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The French – the people who left a huge mark on Western Hangeul research in the 1800s – began to break their long silence and mentioned Hangeul once again only after the 1980s. Fundamentally, the Hangeul research of France in the 1800s began under the Western world’s expansional view to know of the mysterious country Chosun that existed between China and Japan in the 19th century. Therefore, the relatively active Hangeul research of the French that began in the early and lasted until the late 19th century was almost completely lost after diplomatic relationships between Korea and France that were forged in 1886 were severed in 1905. After the Korea-Japan Annexation in 1910, all motivation for research was almost completely lost. Even after Korea’s liberation, interest in Hangeul was not resurrected in France. Practically, throughout the entire 20th century after the Korea-Japan Annexation, there are no cases of French research on Hangeul until the 1980s, save for Japanese scholar expert Haguenauer’s few papers and Cohen’s fragmented mentioning. In short, the French research on Hangeul that was presented in Korea has its tracks stopped in the early 20th century. This paper analyzes the ‘contemporary’ French understanding of Hangeul focused on the three chief articles regarding Hangeul that were published by the French in the 1980s to 2000. The three articles are “Korea’s Letters” included in James Février’s History of Letters published in 1945, went through a complete revision in 1959 and was published again in a revised edition in 1984, “Korea’s Letters” included in Jean-Louis Calvet’s History of Letters published in 1996, and “Korea’s Alphabet” included in Anne-Marie Christin’s publication History of Letters, written by Daniel Bouchez. These three works were chosen because they are the only works of the 1980s to the present in which the French mention Han’gul. These works show that in Western world, scholars are unable to remove their skepticism towards King Sejong as the creator of Korean and the Chinje theory. What is significant is that the Western academic world has been denying the originality of Hangeul, attempting to link it to theories such as the Paspa Letter Origin theory and the Tibet Letter Origin theory. It could be shown that the Western academic world has erroneously been continuing to find a relationship that influenced the creation of Hangeul and continues to do so even in the present 21st century. After the Korean War, unlike the British and American assessments, the French academic world does not have a time of praise for the excellence of Hangeul. Even after the discovery of the original Explanation of the Hunminjeongum in 1940, which clearly showed the principles of the creation of Hangeul, the French refused to accept the latest accomplishments of Korean academics immediately.
Abstract
The French – the people who left a huge mark on Western Hangeul research in the 1800s – began to break their long silence and mentioned Hangeul once again only after the 1980s. Fundamentally, the Hangeul research of France in the 1800s began under the Western world’s expansional view to know of the mysterious country Chosun that existed between China and Japan in the 19th century. Therefore, the relatively active Hangeul research of the French that began in the early and lasted until the late 19th century was almost completely lost after diplomatic relationships between Korea and France that were forged in 1886 were severed in 1905. After the Korea-Japan Annexation in 1910, all motivation for research was almost completely lost. Even after Korea’s liberation, interest in Hangeul was not resurrected in France. Practically, throughout the entire 20th century after the Korea-Japan Annexation, there are no cases of French research on Hangeul until the 1980s, save for Japanese scholar expert Haguenauer’s few papers and Cohen’s fragmented mentioning. In short, the French research on Hangeul that was presented in Korea has its tracks stopped in the early 20th century. This paper analyzes the ‘contemporary’ French understanding of Hangeul focused on the three chief articles regarding Hangeul that were published by the French in the 1980s to 2000. The three articles are “Korea’s Letters” included in James Février’s History of Letters published in 1945, went through a complete revision in 1959 and was published again in a revised edition in 1984, “Korea’s Letters” included in Jean-Louis Calvet’s History of Letters published in 1996, and “Korea’s Alphabet” included in Anne-Marie Christin’s publication History of Letters, written by Daniel Bouchez. These three works were chosen because they are the only works of the 1980s to the present in which the French mention Han’gul. These works show that in Western world, scholars are unable to remove their skepticism towards King Sejong as the creator of Korean and the Chinje theory. What is significant is that the Western academic world has been denying the originality of Hangeul, attempting to link it to theories such as the Paspa Letter Origin theory and the Tibet Letter Origin theory. It could be shown that the Western academic world has erroneously been continuing to find a relationship that influenced the creation of Hangeul and continues to do so even in the present 21st century. After the Korean War, unlike the British and American assessments, the French academic world does not have a time of praise for the excellence of Hangeul. Even after the discovery of the original Explanation of the Hunminjeongum in 1940, which clearly showed the principles of the creation of Hangeul, the French refused to accept the latest accomplishments of Korean academics immediately.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김정대, "외국 학자들의 한글에 대한 평가 연구－서구 학자들을 중심으로－", 國語學, (43), pp.329~384 (2004), 국어학회
- 김민수, "외국인의 한글연구" (1997), 태학사
- 이기문, "19세기 서구 학자들의 한글연구", 대한민국학술원논문집, 39, pp.107~155 (2000)
- 헨드릭 하멜, "하멜 표류기" (2003), 중앙M&B
- ABEL-RÉMUSAT, J. P., Jean-Pierre, "Recherches sur les langues tartares ou Mémoires sur différens points de la grammaire et de la littérature des Mandchous, des Mongols, des Ouigours et des Tibétains" (1820), De l'imprimerie royale
- BERGER, Philippe, "Histoire de l'écriture dans l'antiquité" (1891), Imprimerie Nationale
- BOUCHEZ, Daniel, "Histoire de l'écriture" (2012), Flammarion
- CALVET, Louis-Jean, "Histoire de l'écriture" (1996), Fayard
- COHEN, Marcel, ". Planches" (1958), Imprimerie Nationale et Librairie Klincksieck
- COURANT, Maurice, "Bibliographie coréenne: Tableau littéraire de la Corée, contenant la nomenclature des ouvrages publiés dans ce pays jusqu'en 1890 ainsi que la description et l'analyse détaillées des principaux d'entre ces ouvrages, tome premier" (1894), Ernest Leroux, Éditeur, Librairie de la Société asiatique de l'école des langues orientales vivantes
- COURANT, Maurice, "Note sur les différents systèmes d'écriture employés en Corée" (1983), Éditions du Léopard d'or
- COURANT, Maurice, "Note sur les études coréennes et japonaise" (1983), Éditions du Léopard d'or
- COURANT, Maurice, "Écriture coréenne. Écriture japonaise" (1983), Éditions du Léopard d'or
- DALLET, Charles, "La langue coréenne, in Histoire de l'église de Corée précédée d'une introduction sur l'histoire, les institutions, la langue, les moeurs et coutumes coréennes, tome premier" (1874), Librairie Victor Palmé
- FABRE, André, "Trois écritures à base de caractères chinois: le idu(Corée), les kana(Japon) et le chu nôm(Viet Nam)", pp.206~225 (1980), revue de la Société Suisse-Asie
- FÉVRIER, James, "Histoire de l'écriture" (1984), Payot
- HAGUENAUER, Charles, "Syetème de transcription de l'alphabet coréen", Journal Asiatique, pp.145~161 (1933)
- HAGUENAUER, Charles, "Notices sur les caractères étrangers anciens et modernes", pp.391~395 (1948), Imprimerie Nationale
- HAGUENAUER, Charles, "Les Langues du Monde", pp.433~446 (1952), Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique
- IMBAULT-HUART, Camille, "Manuel de la langue coréenne parlée à l'usage des français" (1889), Imprimerie Nationale
- JEAN, George, "문자의 역사" (1995), 시공사
- KLAPROTH, H. J., "Aperçu de l'origine des diverses écritures de l'ancien monde", ~ (1832)
- RYGALOFF, Alexis, "Le coréen et l'écriture", Cahiers de linguistique - Asie orientale, 11(1), pp.47~63 (1982)
- ROSNY, Léon de, "Aperçu de la langue coréenne (avertissement), in Journal Asiatique ou Recueil de mémoires d'extraits et de notices relatifs à l'histoire, à la philosophie, aux langues et à la littérature des peiples orientaux, sixième série t. III" (1864), A L'Imprimerie Impériale
- ROSNY, Léon de, "Aperçu de la langue coréenne (deuxième article), in Journal Asiatique ou Recueil de mémoires d'extraits et de notices relatifs à l'histoire, à la philosophie, aux langues et à la littérature des peiples orientaux, sixième série t. VIII" (1866), A L'Imprimerie Impériale
- "Les Missionnaires de Corée de la Société des Missions Étrangers de Paris, Dictionnaire Coréen-Français(한불전), Yokohama, Imprimerie de L. Lévy et S. Salabelle", ~ (1880)
- "Les Missionnaires de Corée de la Société des Missions Étrangers de Paris, Grammaire Coréen, Yokohama, Imprimerie de L. Lévy et S. Salabelle", ~ (1881)