이인직 신소설 『혈(血)의 누(淚)』연구 - 서사 구성의 특성과 서사적 거리를 중심으로 -
Study of "Tears of Blood", the new style-novel, by Lee In-jik - Focusing on features of plot and gap between reality and fiction -
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
"Tears of Blood", by Lee In-jik in 1906, a novel of the period of enlightenment, with the Sino-Japanese War as the background, expressed the discourse of enlightenment that the public should make themselves strong and wise with new education. It gave readers of those days impression with its narrative plot. The features of plot can be arranged like belows. First of all, the writer did not aim at reporting the details of the Sino-Japanese War but focusing on growing of the public in the novel. So, in the text, the greater part of the novel consisted of sufferings of the public and their awakening. The situation in which people suffered from the Sino-Japanese War and many families being broken up was given a great deal of weight on his writing, and Ok-ryeon and her father Kim Kwan-il, and Ku Wan-seo who went through these sufferings got to awaken went to the U.S to learn new education in the long run. Next, he curtailed the war situation in the novel. That is, he expressed the war situation in short with literary metaphor and brief description of the narrator in the novel : reduction of part of victory of Japanese over the war and despotism. In the ending part of it, Asianism discourse contradictive narrative were inserted. The contradictive plot of it could be interpreted as a kind of warning that Asianism discourse that the writer hoped mutual prosperity of three countries could not be hope nor make a national crisis clear up. The narrative plot, however, was different from political reality of those days, which was the narrative gap between the novel and reality. There was no alternative for it but to be in his novel because the object of it was neither recording the historical war nor letting us know the situation of those age but telling us his enlightenment discourse that new education itself can be the only way to make the public strong and wise. Besides, he intended to evade comment on political state of Korea, and Sino-Japanese War of literary metaphor showed his point of view that the future of Korea was dark. These were his limitations as he believed the theory of social evolution and he was one of the pro-Japanese. But "Tears of Blood" that made people abandon traditional class consciousness and encouraged the public to grow deserved to be estimated high. His novel, that expressed expectation for the power of the public and belief in the style of the unity of speech and writing and got readers to be moved, was some meaning of the history of literature.
Abstract
"Tears of Blood", by Lee In-jik in 1906, a novel of the period of enlightenment, with the Sino-Japanese War as the background, expressed the discourse of enlightenment that the public should make themselves strong and wise with new education. It gave readers of those days impression with its narrative plot. The features of plot can be arranged like belows. First of all, the writer did not aim at reporting the details of the Sino-Japanese War but focusing on growing of the public in the novel. So, in the text, the greater part of the novel consisted of sufferings of the public and their awakening. The situation in which people suffered from the Sino-Japanese War and many families being broken up was given a great deal of weight on his writing, and Ok-ryeon and her father Kim Kwan-il, and Ku Wan-seo who went through these sufferings got to awaken went to the U.S to learn new education in the long run. Next, he curtailed the war situation in the novel. That is, he expressed the war situation in short with literary metaphor and brief description of the narrator in the novel : reduction of part of victory of Japanese over the war and despotism. In the ending part of it, Asianism discourse contradictive narrative were inserted. The contradictive plot of it could be interpreted as a kind of warning that Asianism discourse that the writer hoped mutual prosperity of three countries could not be hope nor make a national crisis clear up. The narrative plot, however, was different from political reality of those days, which was the narrative gap between the novel and reality. There was no alternative for it but to be in his novel because the object of it was neither recording the historical war nor letting us know the situation of those age but telling us his enlightenment discourse that new education itself can be the only way to make the public strong and wise. Besides, he intended to evade comment on political state of Korea, and Sino-Japanese War of literary metaphor showed his point of view that the future of Korea was dark. These were his limitations as he believed the theory of social evolution and he was one of the pro-Japanese. But "Tears of Blood" that made people abandon traditional class consciousness and encouraged the public to grow deserved to be estimated high. His novel, that expressed expectation for the power of the public and belief in the style of the unity of speech and writing and got readers to be moved, was some meaning of the history of literature.
참고문헌 (29)
- 이인직, "한국대표신소설" (1982), 금자당
- 이병렬, "꼭 읽어야 할 신소설 12선" (1993), 타임기획
- 다지리 히로유끼, "이인직 연구 자료", pp.275~371 (2006), 국학자료원
- 김경일, "동아시아에서 아시아주의 : 1870~1945년의 일본을 중심으로", 역사연구, 8, pp.281~ (2000), 역사학연구소
- 김영작, "김옥균 암살사건과 한․청․일 삼국-기존 학설에 대한 비판적 재검토", 한국정치외교사논총, 11, pp.245~ (1995)
- 김채수, "한국과 일본에서의 언문일치운동의 실상과 그 의미; 일본과 한국의 근대 언문일치체 형성과정", pp.17~20 (2002), 보고사
- 고미숙, "근대계몽기, 그 생성과 변이의 공간에 대한 몇 가지 양상", 민족문학사연구, (14), pp.110~112 (1999), 소명출판
- 구장률, "신소설 출현의 역사적 배경; 근대계몽기 문학의 재인식", pp.176~182 (2007), 문학과 사상연구회
- 전광용, "이인직의 생애와 문학; 신문학과 시대의식", pp.17~28 (1981), 새문사
- 정병호, "한국과 일본의 <신문> 저널리즘과 언문일치 운동", pp.92~102, 위의 책
- 최덕수, "청일전쟁 전후 일본의 한국관", 사총, 30(1), pp.203~214 (1986), 고대사학회
- 최원식, "식민지시대의 소설과 동학; 민족문학의 논리", pp.97~ (1982), 창비
- 최영구, "이인직 소설의 개화사상 연구", 박사, pp.1990
- 최종순, "이인직 소설 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2003
- 함태영, "이인직의 현실 인식과 그 모순; 근대계몽기 문학의 재인식", pp.238~242 (2007), 소명출판
- 한국의 내셔널리즘과 소국의식-조공국에서 국민국가로, "조선", pp.2007, 기무라 간
- 김재용, "한국근대민족문학사", pp.86~95 (1993), 한길사
- 김윤식, "한국근대소설사 연구", pp.23~ (1986), 을유문화사
- 김윤식, "한국근대문학양식논고", pp.188~191 (1990), 아세아문화사
- 개화기 소설연구, "김중하", 국학자료원, 286~298 (2005)
- 김 현(金顯), "현대소설의 담화론적 연구", pp.168~171 (1995), 계명문화사
- 나병철, "소설의 이해", pp.205~ (1998), 문예출판사
- 단재 신채호선생 기념사업회, "단재 신채호전집(개정판) 하", pp.88~91 (1995), 형설출판사
- 박노자, "우승優勝 열패劣敗의 신화", pp.82~84 (2005), 한겨레신문사
- 송민호, "한국개화기 소설의 사적 연구", pp.198~ (1976), 일지사
- 전복희, "사회진화론과 국가사상-구한말을 중심으로", pp.20~32 (1996), 한울 아카데미
- 제라르 주네트, "서사담론", pp.23~148 (1992), 교보문고
- 최원식, "한국근대소설사론", pp.243~ (1986), 창작사
- 최원식, "한국계몽주의문학사론", pp.139~143 (2002), 소명출판사
