본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘중간물(中間物)’과 개인의 자각 -첸리췬(錢理群)의 루쉰(魯迅) 인식

A Meson & Unaware of The Individual

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study analyzed the characteristics of Qian Li Qun’s studies through intermediate concept. Qian Li Qun has received the attention of research community by Lu Xun studies. After that, he was keen to find the ideological support of the 20th century China. What can be called intermediate existential experience into awareness of human finitude. Intermediate concepts of Lu Xun is looking straight despair, and defiance to despair. Intermediate concept is based on a negative perception of history and tradition, and death. Therefore, it lays ontological positive about the present. This paper is based on an understanding of the intermediate concepts analyzed the relationship between intellectuals and society. This is for the formulation of perspectives for understanding the intellectual history of 20th century China. Qian Li Qun should try to find such a link from the Sun Wen, Mao Zedong and Lu Xun. They are all based on the “China” and “Modern” would confirm the relationship between the individual and society. Establish the correct relationship of the individual and society can be said to start from the awareness of the fate of “historical intermediate”.

Abstract

This study analyzed the characteristics of Qian Li Qun’s studies through intermediate concept. Qian Li Qun has received the attention of research community by Lu Xun studies. After that, he was keen to find the ideological support of the 20th century China. What can be called intermediate existential experience into awareness of human finitude. Intermediate concepts of Lu Xun is looking straight despair, and defiance to despair. Intermediate concept is based on a negative perception of history and tradition, and death. Therefore, it lays ontological positive about the present. This paper is based on an understanding of the intermediate concepts analyzed the relationship between intellectuals and society. This is for the formulation of perspectives for understanding the intellectual history of 20th century China. Qian Li Qun should try to find such a link from the Sun Wen, Mao Zedong and Lu Xun. They are all based on the “China” and “Modern” would confirm the relationship between the individual and society. Establish the correct relationship of the individual and society can be said to start from the awareness of the fate of “historical intermediate”.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 魯迅, "魯迅全集 1⋅3⋅4⋅5⋅6⋅7⋅8권" (1981), 인민문학출판사
  2. 첸리췬, "망각을 거부하라: 1957년학 연구 기록" (2012), 그린비
  3. 왕후이, "고뇌하는 중국-현대 중국 지식인의 담론과 중국현실" (2006), 도서출판 길
  4. 첸리췬, "내 정신의 자서전" (2012), 글항아리
  5. 錢理群, "心靈的探尋" (1999), 北京大學出版社
  6. 汪暉, "死火重溫" (2000), 人民文學出版社
  7. 錢理群, "十年沈黙的魯迅", 浙江社會科學, (1) (2003)
  8. 汪暉, "錢理群與他對魯迅心靈的探尋", 讀書, (12) (1988)
  9. 조경란, "‘중국’을 회의하며 계몽하다 -중국문학사 연구자 첸리췬(錢理群)-", 동방학지, (163), pp.289~324 (2013), 국학연구원
  10. 류준필, "困惑과 悖論 : 첸리췬(錢理群)의 ‘중국 사회주의 인식’에 대하여", 한국학연구, (27), pp.179~199 (2012), 한국학연구소[DOI]
  11. 유중하, "중간물로 찍은 동아시아의 두 점 - 노신 , 횡보의 경우 -", 중국어문학지, 4(4), pp.77~101 (1997), 중국어문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)