본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

20세기 중국, 공화정치의 실현인가 구경꾼의 반란인가 ― 루쉰의 국민성 담론을 중심으로

20th Century China, Is It the Realization of the Republican Politics or the Rebellion of the Audience?: In Case of Lu Xun’s Discourse on Chinese People

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This article is written to explore the so-called discourses of Chinese model, one of the hottest issue in contemporary China and to look into 20th century China through Lu Xun’s discourse on Chinese people. The most significant Lu Xun’s role performed in the 20th century China was to devote to criticize the defects of Chinese People including the consciousness of the eternal audience for building modern China. According to Lu Xun’s discourse, I think, it is so doubtful whether the economic growth inadequate in a fare economic system and social security, and the ‘harmony’ lacking in social communication and solidarity, can advance into the path of individual emancipation after all. This point is saying that it is still necessary that we should have an insight into how the individual is being made as a social subject, and should criticize the social realities that suppress individual freedom in China in the era of global capitalism. Fundamentally, for the critical thinking of literature derives from the condition of the existence of the individual itself, not in the theory, then, we will be able to think about the possibility of individuale mancipation, which the 20th century Chinese literature had not done, just in the process of reflectively expressing such individuals’ life condition and their own meaning of existence.

Abstract

This article is written to explore the so-called discourses of Chinese model, one of the hottest issue in contemporary China and to look into 20th century China through Lu Xun’s discourse on Chinese people. The most significant Lu Xun’s role performed in the 20th century China was to devote to criticize the defects of Chinese People including the consciousness of the eternal audience for building modern China. According to Lu Xun’s discourse, I think, it is so doubtful whether the economic growth inadequate in a fare economic system and social security, and the ‘harmony’ lacking in social communication and solidarity, can advance into the path of individual emancipation after all. This point is saying that it is still necessary that we should have an insight into how the individual is being made as a social subject, and should criticize the social realities that suppress individual freedom in China in the era of global capitalism. Fundamentally, for the critical thinking of literature derives from the condition of the existence of the individual itself, not in the theory, then, we will be able to think about the possibility of individuale mancipation, which the 20th century Chinese literature had not done, just in the process of reflectively expressing such individuals’ life condition and their own meaning of existence.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Arthur H. smith, "Chinese Characteristics" (2007), 上海三聯書店
  2. 沙蓮香, "中國民族性 1,2" (1988), 中國人民大學出版社
  3. 何兆武, "中國印象" (2001), 廣西師範大學出版社
  4. 李亦園, "中國人的性格" (1972), 中央硏究員民族學硏究所
  5. 項退結, "中國民族性硏究" (1975), 을유문고
  6. 카모토 히로코, "중국 민족주의의 신화" (2006), 지식의 풍경
  7. DikÖtter, "The Discourse of Race in Modern China" (1992), Stanford
  8. 필립 리처드슨, "중국 근대 경제사 1800~1950(Economy change in China, c.1800~1950)" (2007), 푸른역사
  9. 엄복, "천연론" (2008), 소명출판사
  10. Tomas Huxley, "Evolution and Ethics And Other Essays" (1894), Macmillan And Co
  11. 한스 울리히 벨러, "허구의 민족주의" (2007), 푸른역사
  12. 아더 핸더슨, "중국인의 특성" (2006), 경향미디어
  13. Foster, "Ah Q Archaeology" (2006), Lexington Books
  14. Jing Tsu, "Failure" (2005), Nationalism, and Literature, Stanford
  15. 민정기, "중국 근대의 풍경" (2008), 그린비
  16. 리디아 리우, "언어횡단적 실천" (2005), 소명출판
  17. 장하준, "나쁜 사마리아인들" (2007), 부키
  18. 황동연, "포스트모더니티의 역사들" (2005), 창비
  19. Roberto Romani, "National Character Public Sprit in Britain and France", pp.1750~1914 (2002), Cambridge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)