한글법화경과 가나법화경 서품의 어학적 비교
Linguistic Characteristics of Hangeul and Kana Beophwagyeng (Seopum)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to compare the sameness and difference between Seopum of Beophwagyeng (the Sutra of the Lotus) in Hangeul (Korean letters) and Kana (Japanese letters) on the linguistic perspective. The comparison of these two kinds of books can clarify linguistic characteristics of the language of middle age. The letter and phoneme, word, and grammatical phenomenon are reviewed to find out the linguistic property. Before the comparison of two different country books, Beophawagyeng (the Sutra of the Lotus) Eonhae (the translation of Chinese into Korean in 15th), and Wueolinseogbo have been compared to reflect the perspective of Korean Hanguel Beophwagyeng. And Myoilbon Kana Beophwagyeng and Joglibon Beophwagyeng, also have been compared. Also Chinese Beophwagyeng has been used as a reference. All these works are processed by computerized data base and will contribute to serve as a statistical data process. This study confined to the Seopum of Beophwagyeng, because the research of the whole book is impossible to handle in this article. Beophwagyeng are composed by 28 pum(articles).
Abstract
This paper aims to compare the sameness and difference between Seopum of Beophwagyeng (the Sutra of the Lotus) in Hangeul (Korean letters) and Kana (Japanese letters) on the linguistic perspective. The comparison of these two kinds of books can clarify linguistic characteristics of the language of middle age. The letter and phoneme, word, and grammatical phenomenon are reviewed to find out the linguistic property. Before the comparison of two different country books, Beophawagyeng (the Sutra of the Lotus) Eonhae (the translation of Chinese into Korean in 15th), and Wueolinseogbo have been compared to reflect the perspective of Korean Hanguel Beophwagyeng. And Myoilbon Kana Beophwagyeng and Joglibon Beophwagyeng, also have been compared. Also Chinese Beophwagyeng has been used as a reference. All these works are processed by computerized data base and will contribute to serve as a statistical data process. This study confined to the Seopum of Beophwagyeng, because the research of the whole book is impossible to handle in this article. Beophwagyeng are composed by 28 pum(articles).
참고문헌 (25)
- 고영근, "석보상절, 월인천강지곡, 월인석보 in : 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구", pp.93~158 (1994), 문학과 지성
- 나까무라 에미꼬, "한글법화경과 가나법화경의 해석", 인문학연구, 15, pp.5~26 (2009), 경희대학교 인문학 연구원
- 남성우, "월인석보와 법화경언해의 동의어 연구" (2001), 태학사
- 노은주, "법화경의 번역에 대한 연구: 특히 어휘 및 통사를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1990
- 박기서, "월인석보 권15와 법화경언해 권4의 문체 비교 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 박순서, "월인석보 권12와 법화경언해의 대비 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 안병희, "월인석보 권 11, 12에 대하여", 국어생활, 9 (1987), 국립국어연구원
- 안병희, "법화경언해의 서지", 한국서지학회, 22 (1998), 한국서지학회
- 이석록, "월인석보 권 11, 12와 법화경언해의 비교 연구", 석사, pp.1992
- 이운허, "법화경" (1990), 동국대학교역경원
- 이원섭, "법화경의 사상 in : 법화경 삼중당 사상 총서" (1982), 삼중당
- 이호권, "법화경의 언해에 대한 비교 연구", 국어연구, 78 (1987)
- 이호권, "법화경언해, 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구 in : 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구" (1994), 문학과 지성사
- 이호권, "석보상절의 서지와 언어 in : 국어학회 국어학총서" (2001), 태학사
- 根上剛士, "妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経のおをの表記", 妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経研究篇 (1993)
- 金倉圓照, "法華經における法護と羅什の譯語" (1972), 法華經の中國的展開
- 柏谷直樹, "妙一本仮名書き法華經 と 足利本仮名書き法華經 の間", 埼玉端期大學硏究紀要, (3), pp.9~19 (1988)
- 小林芳規, "妙法蓮華経の訓読史から観た妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経", 妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経研究篇 (1993)
- 柴田昭二, "字音資料としての妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経", 妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経研究篇 (1993)
- 野澤勝夫, "仮名書き法華經 硏究 序說" (2008), 逸誠出版
- 田村芳朗, "法華經 上" (1988), 厚德社
- 中田祝夫, "妙一記念館本仮名書き法華經によせる in : 妙一記念館本" (1993), 妙一記念館
- 中田祝夫, "妙一記念館本仮名書き法華経 影印篇" (1998), 霊友会
- 坂本幸男, "法華經の中國的展開" (1972), 平樂寺書店
- 坂本幸男, "法華經" (1979), 岩波文庫