본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

伊藤博文の韓国儒教観について

A Policy for Confucianism by Itohirobumi(伊藤博文) and Tokanhu(統監府)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study focus on a policy for confucianism by Tokanhu(統監府, the main office of proconsul) and Itohirobumi(伊藤博文, 1841-1909). In Korea, after Joseon Dynasty era, take a confucianism policy mainly as national polity. So it has Yulim(儒林, a traditional confucian groups) who are an influential senior noblemen and a landowner, a large number of families settled Joseon society for generations. The modern Korea also, when Ito is sent to Korea as a beginner of proconsul(統監), has so many Yulim groups. Tokanhu and Ito need the Yulim groups as a collaborator for colonial rule on the Korean peninsula, successfully. Because they should fight against Japan colonial rule for an independence movement. with enlightening Korean intellectual as well as young man, Tokanhu and Ito begin to bribe a person with money and power, sometimes they use carrot and stick, obtaining a Japanophile(a sympathizer for Japan) who is, so called, Chinilpa(親日派. the pro-Japanese group) in Korean. On the one hand they want to have Japanophile confucian and on the other to found a new confucian society. So they took every measure for confucian to win their over and found Daedonghakhoe(大學會), a new confucian society, with at the head of the pro-Japanese group as a projector. But Tokanhu and Ito should had a hard time to persuade most Yulim in Korea except only the pro-Japanese group. They underestimated the problem of nationalism connected deeply with Korean confucianism. It cause from, first of all, their lack of understanding for the essence of Korea confucianism. So, the plan for control Korean confucian and confucianism are fell through. Moreover, Ito is shot by Anjunggun(安重根) and died at Harbin(哈爾濱) in China.

Abstract

This study focus on a policy for confucianism by Tokanhu(統監府, the main office of proconsul) and Itohirobumi(伊藤博文, 1841-1909). In Korea, after Joseon Dynasty era, take a confucianism policy mainly as national polity. So it has Yulim(儒林, a traditional confucian groups) who are an influential senior noblemen and a landowner, a large number of families settled Joseon society for generations. The modern Korea also, when Ito is sent to Korea as a beginner of proconsul(統監), has so many Yulim groups. Tokanhu and Ito need the Yulim groups as a collaborator for colonial rule on the Korean peninsula, successfully. Because they should fight against Japan colonial rule for an independence movement. with enlightening Korean intellectual as well as young man, Tokanhu and Ito begin to bribe a person with money and power, sometimes they use carrot and stick, obtaining a Japanophile(a sympathizer for Japan) who is, so called, Chinilpa(親日派. the pro-Japanese group) in Korean. On the one hand they want to have Japanophile confucian and on the other to found a new confucian society. So they took every measure for confucian to win their over and found Daedonghakhoe(大學會), a new confucian society, with at the head of the pro-Japanese group as a projector. But Tokanhu and Ito should had a hard time to persuade most Yulim in Korea except only the pro-Japanese group. They underestimated the problem of nationalism connected deeply with Korean confucianism. It cause from, first of all, their lack of understanding for the essence of Korea confucianism. So, the plan for control Korean confucian and confucianism are fell through. Moreover, Ito is shot by Anjunggun(安重根) and died at Harbin(哈爾濱) in China.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. "倫音, 尊華錄 卷6", ~
  2. "尊聖倫音, 大東正路 卷51", ~
  3. 朴趾源, "兩班伝", ~
  4. 朝鮮總督府取調局長官石塚英藏, "四色に關する調査" (1909), 朝鮮總督府取調局
  5. "大東学会月報 第1号", 大東学会
  6. 渡部学, "日本植民地敎育政策史料集成(朝鮮編) 第63巻" (1910), 竜溪書舍
  7. 小松綠, "伊藤公全集", 2 (1928), 昭和出版社
  8. 韓国精神文化硏究院, "韓末義兵戰爭資料集: 暴徒檄文", 近現代史史料叢書, 8 (2000), ソウル:圖書出版 スンイン
  9. 水野直樹, "朝鮮総督論告․訓示集成 一" (2001), 緑陰書房
  10. 堀川修, "公刊明治天理御記編修委員会史料末松子爵家所藏 文書" (2003), ゆまに書房
  11. Ladd, George Trumbull, "In Korea with Marquis Ito", pp.181~ (1908), Longmans, Green & Co.
  12. 幣原坦, "朝鮮敎育論", pp.21~359 (1919), 六盟社
  13. 竹越與三郞, "南国記", pp.188~190 (1910), 二酉社
  14. 呂圭亨, "孔子敎会之旣往及將來", pp.17~ (1910), 孔子敎会本部
  15. 市村瓚次郞, "日韓併合と精神統一", 敎育界, 9(12) (1910)
  16. 高橋享, "緖言 in : 李朝仏敎", pp.1929, 寶文館
  17. 河井朝雄, "大邱物語", pp.143~144 (1931), 朝鮮民報社
  18. 吳知泳, "東学史 二: 儒林과 兩班의 行惡 in : 東学史(草稿本)" (1940), 春畝公追頌会
  19. 尹学準, "溫突夜話 - 現代両班考" (1983), 中央公論社
  20. 伊藤亜人, "朝鮮を知る事典", pp.419~, 平凡社
  21. 劉準基, "1910年代日帝の儒林親日化政策-孔子敎と大同敎を中心に- in : 建大史学", pp.88~ (1993), 建国大学校史学会
  22. 李明花, "朝鮮總督府の儒敎政策(1910-1920年代)", 韓国獨立運動史硏究, 7 (1993), 独立記念館韓国独立運動史硏究所
  23. 宮嶋博史, "両班(ヤンバン) (李朝社会の特權階層)" (1995), 中央公論社
  24. 鄭圭永, "京城帝国大学に見る戦後日本の高等教育と国家", 박사, pp.1995
  25. 鄭圭永, "朝鮮總督府朝鮮儒敎支配 in : 学生生活硏究 第4輯" (1996), 淸州敎育大学 学生生活硏究所
  26. 原田豊次郞, "伊藤公と韓国" (1996), 竜渓書舎
  27. Beasley、W. G., "Japanes Imperialism 1894-1945", pp.48~53 (1999), Clarendon
  28. ハンミョングン, "韓末韓日合邦論硏究", pp.15~24 (2002), 国学資料院
  29. 李成茂, "朝鮮初期両班硏究" (2003), 韓国学術情報
  30. チェギョンスク, "日帝の宗敎政策と基督敎", 比較文化硏究, 14, pp.92~96 (2003), 釜山外大
  31. 海野福寿, "伊藤博文と韓国併合", pp.81~82 (2004), 青木書店
  32. ガンジュンマン, "日本と西欧の植民統治比較" (2004), 図書出版 スンイン
  33. 柳美那, "植民地期朝鮮における経学院 ー儒教教化機関と儒教イデオロギーの再編", 朝鮮史硏究会文集, 42, pp.108~109 (2004)
  34. 柳美那, "植民地権力への‘協力’と挫折 - 経学院と鄕校及び文廟との関係を中心に -", 韓国文化, (36), pp.158~ (2005), 韓国文化研究所
  35. 伊藤之雄, "近代日本の君主制の形成と朝鮮", 法学論叢, 154(4) (2004)
  36. 李盛煥, "朝鮮総督府支配政策と高橋享", オヌルウイドンヤンササン(今日の東洋思想), (13) (2005), 芸文書院
  37. 伊藤之雄, "伊藤博文と韓国統治 - 初代韓国統監をめぐる百年目の検証 -" (2009), ミネルヴァ書房
  38. 李盛煥, "한국과 이토 히로부미(韓国と伊藤博文)" (2009), ソンイン
  39. "寺內総督府の談片, 每日申報 1911年8月6日付", ~ (1911)
  40. [URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)