본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한-중 FTA: 한국의 대응 방향을 중심으로

Korea-China FTA : Focusing on Korea's Strategy

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The Korea-China FTA(hereafter, KCFTA) has been recently re-focused after China concluded its ECFA(Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement) with Taiwan in June 2010. Since 2004 in the APEC summit, however, a non-governmental feasibility study and then, the Joint Study by government officials and academic and business experts on a potential KCFTA have been conducted. Having considered the conclusion of the Joint Study Report that the KCFTA could produce various benefits to both countries. negotiations of the KCFTA can be initiated in time. Under this situation, the purpose of this research is to investigate the Korea's strategy of FTA negotiations with China. Before discussing the Korea's strategy, this article covers theoretical analyses on the KCFTA divided into two parts, economic and non-economic - so-called political or strategic - aspects. Based upon theoretical analyses with examining the China's previous FTAs, this paper argues that China could pursue its FTA with Korea mostly for the political reasons rather than economic benefits. Moreover, China's strategy in FTA negotiations with Korea could be pragmatic and flexible as it was in its previous FTAs with employing 'step-by-step approach' and 'Early Harvest Programme'. From this perspective, Korea in its FTA negotiations with China needs to approach in terms of 'strategic move'. Having considered the China's roles and its growing power in East Asia and further in the global political and economic system as a counterpart to the US, it should be a necessary step for Korea to conclude an FTA with China in order to actively and positively respond to the change of the international order. It should be also considered that, however, the gap between preference and non-preference of the KCFTA will be huge according to industries. This indicates that Korea's strategy should approach to minimise damages to sensitive industries to the KCFTA. It is a national consent that, however, is the most important with democratic controls in negotiating processes.

Abstract

The Korea-China FTA(hereafter, KCFTA) has been recently re-focused after China concluded its ECFA(Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement) with Taiwan in June 2010. Since 2004 in the APEC summit, however, a non-governmental feasibility study and then, the Joint Study by government officials and academic and business experts on a potential KCFTA have been conducted. Having considered the conclusion of the Joint Study Report that the KCFTA could produce various benefits to both countries. negotiations of the KCFTA can be initiated in time. Under this situation, the purpose of this research is to investigate the Korea's strategy of FTA negotiations with China. Before discussing the Korea's strategy, this article covers theoretical analyses on the KCFTA divided into two parts, economic and non-economic - so-called political or strategic - aspects. Based upon theoretical analyses with examining the China's previous FTAs, this paper argues that China could pursue its FTA with Korea mostly for the political reasons rather than economic benefits. Moreover, China's strategy in FTA negotiations with Korea could be pragmatic and flexible as it was in its previous FTAs with employing 'step-by-step approach' and 'Early Harvest Programme'. From this perspective, Korea in its FTA negotiations with China needs to approach in terms of 'strategic move'. Having considered the China's roles and its growing power in East Asia and further in the global political and economic system as a counterpart to the US, it should be a necessary step for Korea to conclude an FTA with China in order to actively and positively respond to the change of the international order. It should be also considered that, however, the gap between preference and non-preference of the KCFTA will be huge according to industries. This indicates that Korea's strategy should approach to minimise damages to sensitive industries to the KCFTA. It is a national consent that, however, is the most important with democratic controls in negotiating processes.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 곽진오, "일본의 대 동아시아 FTA 정책: 가능성과 한계에 관한 연구", 제학공동학술대회 논문 발표집 (2008)
  2. 윤성욱, "한국의 자유무역협정(FTA) 협상파트너 선택의 정치경제학적 분석", 국제정치논총, 49(4), pp.107~138 (2009), 한국국제정치학회
  3. 이호철, "한중 FTA의 배경과 전망. in: 정세와 정책", pp.13~15 (2007)
  4. 주장환, "중국 FTA 전략의 좌표 찾기 : 국제정치경제이론의 맥락에서", 아세아연구, 53(1), pp.155~182 (2010), 아세아문제연구소
  5. 주장환, "인민폐 국제화의 정치경제: 배경과 전략을 중심으로", 국가전략, 15(4), pp.57~80 (2009), 세종연구소
  6. 중국의 한중 FTA추진 배경과 한중 FTA 전망. in: IFANS 주요국제문제분석, "최원기", ~ (2004)
  7. 문화일보, "양안 ECFA와 한중 FTA", ~ (2010)
  8. 매일경제, "중국, 5년새 8개국과 FTA 속전속결: 경제영토 늘려 영향력 강화 - 美견제 포석도", ~ (2010)
  9. 서울경제, "힌-EU FTA 11월 잠정 발효", ~ (2010)
  10. 연합뉴스, "중, 한-중 FTA 협상 내년 시작", ~ (2010)
  11. 이데일리, "FTA교섭대표 “한⋅중FTA, 하반기 중 민감성 분야 협의: 중⋅대만 ECFA 동향 주시.. 한⋅EU FTA 연내 발효 기대”", ~ (2010)
  12. 조선일보, "원자바오 “韓⋅中FTA, 쉬운 것부터”", ~ (2010)
  13. 조선일보, "韓-中FTA 개방폭 - 美, EU보다 작을 것", ~ (2010)
  14. 沈佳, "‘중국의 FTA 추진 배경과 전략 해부’ LG 주간 경제", ~ (2007)
  15. KIEP, "중국-뉴질랜드간FTA 협상체결결과및시사점", KIEP 오늘의세계경제 (2008), 대외경제정책원
  16. POSRI, "한-중 FTA 사전 점검", China Journal, pp.21~35 (2007)
  17. 한⋅일, 한⋅중 FTA에 대한 제조기업 의견조사 결과. in: IIT 보고서, "한국무역협회", ~ (2010)
  18. Chad Damro, "The Political Economy of Regional Trade Aagreements. in: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System", pp.23~42 (2006), Oxford University Press
  19. Edward J. Lincoln, "Comments on China as a Regional Player" (2006), THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES
  20. Henry Gao, "China's Strategy for Free Trade Agreements: Political battle in the name of trade", paper presented at Asian Regional Workshop on Free Trade Agreements: Towards inclusive Trade Policies in Post-Crisis Asia (2009)
  21. Jae Ho Chung, "Between Ally and Partner: Korea-China Relations and the United States", pp.108~119 (2007), Columbia University Press
  22. Jisi Wang, "China's Changing Role in Asia. in: The Rise of China and a Changing East Asian Order", pp.3~21 (2004), Japan Center for International Exchange
  23. John Ravenhill, "Regionalism. in: Global Political Economy", pp.173~209 (2008), Oxford University Press
  24. Michael A. BcDevitt, "The China Factor in Future U.S. Defense Planning. in: Strategic Surprise", pp.141~158 (2003), Naval War College Press
  25. Stephen Woolcock, "The regional dimension: European Economic Diplomacy. in: The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations", pp.197~214 (2003), Routledge
  26. Zerui Yang, "China's FTA Developments", Paper Presented at APEC Study Center, 2004, ~
  27. "외교통상부 자유무역협정 ‘한-중국 FTA’"[URL]
  28. "외교통상부 자유무역협정 "The Joint Study Report for Korea-China FTA""[URL]
  29. "China FTA Strategy"[URL]
  30. Rongji Zhu, "Report on the Outline of the Tenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development (2001)", Delivered at the Fourth Session of the Ninth National People's Congress (2001)
  31. "Chinese FTA Negotiation Made a Good Start During the Tenth Five-Year Plan"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)