권력과 정치적 권위의 문제에서 바라 본 墨子의 정치사상
Political Thought of Mozi on Power and Political Authority
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to study political thought of Mozi on power and political authority. Political thought of Mozi is the establishment and operation of a political system based on Shangtonglun(尙同論). Shangtong(尙同)'s logic should respect and follow the opinions of superiors, which have the return to feudalism centered at Tianzi(天子) and a vertical characteristics of the upper and lower. Therefore the challenge arises from two aspects. First, it did not reflect the political landscape at that time. Second, it is in conflict with his ethical ideology[兼愛]. These problems can be solved when political thought of Mozi is interpreted in terms of power and political authority. This becomes the theoretical basis for solving the two difficulties implied in Shangtonglun(尙同論). First, since the logic of homology is also applied to Tianzi(天子), the power of Tianzi(天子) can secure political authority by Tian(天). The attribution of Tian(天) is a premise that can induce voluntary obedience of the people because it is unselfish. Second, Tianyi(天意) is Jianai(兼愛). Tianzi(天子) must observe the horizontal ethical principles of Jianai(兼愛), so the power of Tianzi(天子) guarantees morality. As a result, the power of Tianzi(天子) will secure autonomous obedience and morality through the symbol of Tian(天).
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study political thought of Mozi on power and political authority. Political thought of Mozi is the establishment and operation of a political system based on Shangtonglun(尙同論). Shangtong(尙同)'s logic should respect and follow the opinions of superiors, which have the return to feudalism centered at Tianzi(天子) and a vertical characteristics of the upper and lower. Therefore the challenge arises from two aspects. First, it did not reflect the political landscape at that time. Second, it is in conflict with his ethical ideology[兼愛]. These problems can be solved when political thought of Mozi is interpreted in terms of power and political authority. This becomes the theoretical basis for solving the two difficulties implied in Shangtonglun(尙同論). First, since the logic of homology is also applied to Tianzi(天子), the power of Tianzi(天子) can secure political authority by Tian(天). The attribution of Tian(天) is a premise that can induce voluntary obedience of the people because it is unselfish. Second, Tianyi(天意) is Jianai(兼愛). Tianzi(天子) must observe the horizontal ethical principles of Jianai(兼愛), so the power of Tianzi(天子) guarantees morality. As a result, the power of Tianzi(天子) will secure autonomous obedience and morality through the symbol of Tian(天).
참고문헌 (18)
- 孫詒讓, "墨子閒詁" (2001), 中華書局
- 郭沫若, "中國古代思想史" (1991), 까치
- 勞思光, "≪中國哲學史≫古代篇" (1986), 탐구당
- 리펑, "중국고대사" (2017), 사회평론
- 앤거스 그래이엄, "도의 논쟁자들" (2001), 새물결
- 앤드류 헤이우드, "정치이론" (2016), 명인문화사
- 蘇公權, "中國政治思想史" (1998), 서울대학교 출판부
- 호프만 존, "국가와 권력 그리고 민주주의" (2000), 문예연구사
- Edited by Joseph Raz, "Authority" (1990), Basil Blackwell
- 김형진, "『墨子』에 대한 전체주의적 해석의 단초― 「兼愛」, 「尙同」을 중심으로 ―", 철학, (104), pp.1~32 (2010), 한국철학회
- 빈동철, "왕권 계승의 정당성과 전국시대 정치사상", 동양고전연구, (74), pp.97~123 (2019), 동양고전학회
- 이양수, "민주주의와 대표성- 정치적 권위의 모색", 윤리학, 4 (2015)
- 이종은, "상징과 정치적 권위", 정치사상연구, 17(1), pp.9~32 (2011), 한국정치사상학회
- 이태승, "묵자의 의리관(義理觀)과 정치적 실천", 동양문화와 사상, 3 (2017)
- 윤상연, "권위주의적인 사람은 항상 권위에 복종적일까?: 권위주의 성격에 따른 권위관계 상황별 복종의 차이", 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 14(3), pp.41~56 (2008), 한국문화및사회문제심리학회
- 최보경, "墨子思想에 나타난 합리적 이익 추구와 배려의 양립 가능성", 중국학논총, (65), pp.19~42 (2019), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 황성규, "묵자 「상현」과 「상동」편에 내재된 정치 이론 고찰", 동양철학, (31), pp.155~188 (2009), 한국동양철학회[DOI]
- Mark Haugaard, "Democracy, Political Power, and Authority", Social research, 77(4) (2010)