본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

墨子思想에 나타난 합리적 이익 추구와 배려의 양립 가능성

Reasonable Self-interest and Love on Mozi

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The aim of this paper is to be compatible altruistic behavior and self-interest on the Mozi. In general, the former and the latter have been distinguished as moral and immoral. However he combined altruistic behavior with self-interest. Mozi suggested to reconcile the self-interest and care(愛). First, he broke up the concept of confrontation: Li(利) and Yi(義). Specially, Mozi tried to exclude selfish-desire and selfishness. Second, he suggested reasonable self-interest. Third, reasonable self-interest and love are no longer distinct on Mozi. He emphasized Ruo(若) to realize Jianai(兼愛), just like “See other people’s states as one’s own state”. Since Jianai(兼愛) includes inclusive love, it is effective to exclude selfishness. In Mohism, Jianai(兼愛) had always been argued in balance with Jiaoxiangli (交相利). However, if Jianai(兼愛) and Jiaoxiangli(交相利) are recognised equal, each theoretical feature may be overlooked. In meaning between Jian(兼) and Jiao(交) should be clearly recognized and distinguished. The former was proposed to emphasize the meaning of love or care, the latter implied the rationality of self-interest. In this respect, Mozi’s Jianai(兼愛) and Jiaoxiangli(交相利) is the theoretical premise of compatibility: self-interest and love.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to be compatible altruistic behavior and self-interest on the Mozi. In general, the former and the latter have been distinguished as moral and immoral. However he combined altruistic behavior with self-interest. Mozi suggested to reconcile the self-interest and care(愛). First, he broke up the concept of confrontation: Li(利) and Yi(義). Specially, Mozi tried to exclude selfish-desire and selfishness. Second, he suggested reasonable self-interest. Third, reasonable self-interest and love are no longer distinct on Mozi. He emphasized Ruo(若) to realize Jianai(兼愛), just like “See other people’s states as one’s own state”. Since Jianai(兼愛) includes inclusive love, it is effective to exclude selfishness. In Mohism, Jianai(兼愛) had always been argued in balance with Jiaoxiangli (交相利). However, if Jianai(兼愛) and Jiaoxiangli(交相利) are recognised equal, each theoretical feature may be overlooked. In meaning between Jian(兼) and Jiao(交) should be clearly recognized and distinguished. The former was proposed to emphasize the meaning of love or care, the latter implied the rationality of self-interest. In this respect, Mozi’s Jianai(兼愛) and Jiaoxiangli(交相利) is the theoretical premise of compatibility: self-interest and love.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. "十三經注疏(整理本)" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  2. "十三經注疏(整理本)" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  3. 孫詒讓, "墨子閒詁" (1971), 商務印書館
  4. 이승환, "유가사상의 사회철학적 재조명" (1998), 고려대학교 출판부
  5. 윌리엄 파운드스톤, "죄수의 딜레마" (2004), 양문
  6. 제임스 레이첼즈, "도덕 철학의 기초" (2016), 나눔의 집
  7. 譚戒甫, "墨辯發微" (1964), 中華書局
  8. 고현범, "도덕 철학에서 감정의 위상 - 애덤 스미스의 도덕 감정론과 그 영향을 중심으로 -", 순천향 인문과학논총, 35(2), pp.57~85 (2016), 인문학연구소
  9. 김기현, "묵가 윤리학에 대한 연구의 한계와 과제", 윤리교육연구, (12), pp.19~38 (2007), 한국윤리교육학회
  10. 김승영, "사회생물학의 입장에서 본 묵자사상의 진화적 역사성", 양명학, (32), pp.225~254 (2012), 한국양명학회[DOI]
  11. 소병철, "도덕성은 합리적으로 정당화될 수 있는가?", 대동철학, (39), pp.75~101 (2007), 대동철학회
  12. 이태승, "묵가의 의리관(義利觀)과 겸애(兼愛)", 동양고전연구, (67), pp.297~326 (2017), 동양고전학회[DOI]
  13. 정재현, "자와 묵자에 있어서의 私欲의 조정혹은 극복의 문제 - ‘수양’과 ‘지성의 운용’ -", 철학논집, 46, pp.131~155 (2016), 철학연구소[DOI]
  14. Kelly Rogers, "Beyond self and Other", Social Philosophy and policy, 10 (1993)
  15. Dan Robins, "Mohist Care", Philosophy East and West, 62(1) (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)