본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어 보어의 현실성과 문장 종결 기능 ― ‘得’자 상태보어와 결과보어의 문법화 경로를 중심으로

The sentence ending function of Mandarin complement and its relation to realis mood

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In modern Mandarin, the '得' complement of state can represent the realization of results and has a sentence ending function, while the resultative complement cannot form a complete sentence without the help of aspect markers or other grammatical markers. In this paper, it was shown that the sentence ending function in modern Mandarin is difficult to grasp simply with the presence or absence of ‘modality meaning’ or morphological markers, and should be analyzed based on the purpose of communication and delivery of information. Considering the purpose of the sentence, the '得' complement of state and the resultative complement can only form legitimate sentences if they imply the realization of the situation and related result. Therefore, the difference in the sentence ending function depends on whether the sentence can imply realization of the situation(realis). This paper argues that the difference on whether the '得' complement of state or the resultative complement can imply realization of result lies within their grammaticalization process. The '得' complement of state originates from 'V得X' and 'V得' structure, which represent the meaning of the achievement of certain action or the result caused by the action. This form has further developed into the mean to provide specific description of the result caused by the action in realis context. This still remains true in modern Mandarin, therefore '得' complement of state can imply the realization of result that follows the action the predicate depicts. On the other hand, the resultative complement is originated from the 'VV' structure, which is related to verbs that can form cause-and-effect relationship and the double-syllable phenomenon. Originally, the 'VV' structure could contextually represent the action and the realization of its result. However, due to the influence of combination of ‘了’‘s grammaticalization, ’了’ began to take over the function of representing realization. Therefore, predicate-complement structure developed from the ‘VV’ structure lost the meaning of realization and began to require other markers to form a legitimate sentence. Grammaticalization process of Mandarin complements is still ongoing in modern times, and the changes are reflected on sentence ending functions of those forms. It is hoped that more research will be conducted on the direction of grammaticalization and the resulting new language phenomena of modern Mandarin complements.

Abstract

In modern Mandarin, the '得' complement of state can represent the realization of results and has a sentence ending function, while the resultative complement cannot form a complete sentence without the help of aspect markers or other grammatical markers. In this paper, it was shown that the sentence ending function in modern Mandarin is difficult to grasp simply with the presence or absence of ‘modality meaning’ or morphological markers, and should be analyzed based on the purpose of communication and delivery of information. Considering the purpose of the sentence, the '得' complement of state and the resultative complement can only form legitimate sentences if they imply the realization of the situation and related result. Therefore, the difference in the sentence ending function depends on whether the sentence can imply realization of the situation(realis). This paper argues that the difference on whether the '得' complement of state or the resultative complement can imply realization of result lies within their grammaticalization process. The '得' complement of state originates from 'V得X' and 'V得' structure, which represent the meaning of the achievement of certain action or the result caused by the action. This form has further developed into the mean to provide specific description of the result caused by the action in realis context. This still remains true in modern Mandarin, therefore '得' complement of state can imply the realization of result that follows the action the predicate depicts. On the other hand, the resultative complement is originated from the 'VV' structure, which is related to verbs that can form cause-and-effect relationship and the double-syllable phenomenon. Originally, the 'VV' structure could contextually represent the action and the realization of its result. However, due to the influence of combination of ‘了’‘s grammaticalization, ’了’ began to take over the function of representing realization. Therefore, predicate-complement structure developed from the ‘VV’ structure lost the meaning of realization and began to require other markers to form a legitimate sentence. Grammaticalization process of Mandarin complements is still ongoing in modern times, and the changes are reflected on sentence ending functions of those forms. It is hoped that more research will be conducted on the direction of grammaticalization and the resulting new language phenomena of modern Mandarin complements.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
  2. 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2000), 한국문화사
  3. 이익환, "심리동사의 의미론" (2005), 역락
  4. 孫錫信, "漢語歷史語法要略" (1992), 復旦大學出版社
  5. 王力, "漢語史稿" (1996), 中華書局
  6. 徐中舒, "甲骨文字典" (1989), 四川辭書出版社
  7. Chao, Y. R., "A Grammar of Spoken Chinese" (1968), University of California Press
  8. Heine, B., "World Lexicon of Grammaticalization" (2002), Cambridge Univ. Press
  9. Li, "표준중국어문법" (2015), 한울 아카데미
  10. Lyons, J., "Semantics : Volume 2" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  11. Sun, C. F., "Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese" (1996), Stanford University Press
  12. Xiao, R., "Aspect in Mandarin Chinese : A corpus-based study" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing
  13. 윤유정, "'得'자 상태보어구문의 문법화 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  14. 이운재, "시·공간 개념에 근거한 현대 중국어 어순 연구", 박사, 중어중문학과 어학전공, pp.2014
  15. 赵长才, "汉语述补结构的历时研究", 博士, pp.2000
  16. 안기섭, "古代漢語 ‘焉’의 풀이에 대한 一考察-先秦ㆍ兩漢 시기를 중심으로-", 중국어문학, (61), pp.563~604 (2012), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
  17. 유영기, "중국어 ' 동보구조 (動補構造) ' 의 통시적 연구", 언어학, (23), pp.139~163 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  18. 崔圭鉢, "현대 중국어 보어 ‘得’字 構文 연구", 중국어문논총, (36), pp.15~38 (2008), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  19. 최규발, "현대중국어의 ‘종결성’과 ‘종결성분’ ― 어기조사와 보어 구문을 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (102), pp.69~88 (2020), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  20. 최규발, "코퍼스에 기반한 현대중국어 ‘氣得’구문의 사역성과 비사역성 試探", 중국어문학논집, (66), pp.49~69 (2011), 중국어문학연구회
  21. 최규발, "중국어의 PVC에 관한 소고", 중국어문논총, (45), pp.1~18 (2010), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  22. 曹秀玲, ""得"字的語法化和"得"字補語", 延邊大學學報 : 社會科學版, 38(3), pp.82~84 (2005)
  23. 劉承慧, "古漢語動詞的複合化與使成化", 漢學研究, 18, pp.231~260 (2000)
  24. 楊平, "帶"得"的述補結構的產生和發展", 古漢語研究, 1, pp.56~63 (1990)
  25. 余健萍, "現代漢語補語研究資料", pp.9~81 (1992), 北京語言學院出版社
  26. 岳俊發, ""得"字句的產生和演變", 語言研究, 2, pp.10~30 (1984)
  27. 張京魚, "漢語心理動詞及其句式", 唐都學刊, 1, pp.112~115 (2001)
  28. 志村良治, "中國中世紀語法史研究", pp.212~241 (1995), 中華書局
  29. Fillmore, C. J., "The Case for Case", Proceedings of the Texas Symposium on Language Universals (1967)
  30. Hopper, P., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56, pp.251~299 (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)