본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어 ‘掉’의 의미 확장과 주관화 중한 대조연구

The grammaticalization and semantic subjectivism of complement "Diao": a comparative analysis between China and korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Through the analysis of examples, this paper makes a diachronic and synchronic investigation of the Chinese result complement “diao(掉)”. At the same time, the comparative analysis of Korean grammar points corresponding to it is also made. Through this process, the grammaticalization process of “diao(掉)” and the mechanism that cause it to be grammaticalization are analyzed. At the same time the result complement “diao(掉)” and “Vdiao(掉)” and semantic “diao(掉)” structure of the subjective tendency are described and analyzed. Through investigation, we find that “diao(掉)” has developed into the resultant complement “diao(掉)” in modern Chinese after the change process of “VP(V/V+O)”→ “diao(掉)+V₂”→ “V₁+diao(掉)”→ “Vdiao(掉)” from the ancient times to the modern Chinese era. Results the grammaticalization of complement “diao(掉)” plays a decisive role in the mechanism of “metaphor” and “reanalysis” and “subjectivism” in the process of grammaticalization. The complement of “diao(掉)” and the Korean “_어 버리다” and “_어 치우다”corresponding. It is found that the Chinese “Vdiao(掉)” has two characteristics, such as the centrality of the subject and the centrality of the speaker. “diao(掉)” has the centrality of the subject. The Korean language “_어 버리다” and “_어 치우다” has different subjective characteristics. “_어 버리다” has the central character of the speaker. “_어 치우다” has the centrality of the subject. In a word, there are great differences in the grammaticalization of the Chinese and Korean languages in the process of grammaticalization.

Abstract

Through the analysis of examples, this paper makes a diachronic and synchronic investigation of the Chinese result complement “diao(掉)”. At the same time, the comparative analysis of Korean grammar points corresponding to it is also made. Through this process, the grammaticalization process of “diao(掉)” and the mechanism that cause it to be grammaticalization are analyzed. At the same time the result complement “diao(掉)” and “Vdiao(掉)” and semantic “diao(掉)” structure of the subjective tendency are described and analyzed. Through investigation, we find that “diao(掉)” has developed into the resultant complement “diao(掉)” in modern Chinese after the change process of “VP(V/V+O)”→ “diao(掉)+V₂”→ “V₁+diao(掉)”→ “Vdiao(掉)” from the ancient times to the modern Chinese era. Results the grammaticalization of complement “diao(掉)” plays a decisive role in the mechanism of “metaphor” and “reanalysis” and “subjectivism” in the process of grammaticalization. The complement of “diao(掉)” and the Korean “_어 버리다” and “_어 치우다”corresponding. It is found that the Chinese “Vdiao(掉)” has two characteristics, such as the centrality of the subject and the centrality of the speaker. “diao(掉)” has the centrality of the subject. The Korean language “_어 버리다” and “_어 치우다” has different subjective characteristics. “_어 버리다” has the central character of the speaker. “_어 치우다” has the centrality of the subject. In a word, there are great differences in the grammaticalization of the Chinese and Korean languages in the process of grammaticalization.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 강덕구, "한․일 양국어 보조용언의 문법화 과정에 대하여", 일어일문학, (21), pp.1~20 (2004), 대한일어일문학회
  2. 김동환, "주관화와 의미 확장", 현대문법 연구, (23) (2001), 현대문법학회
  3. 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구" (1996), 한국문화사
  4. 안미경, "주관화가 의미변화에 미치는 영향: 연결어미_(어)서 _(으)니(까)의 문법화", 담화 인지언어학회 제1회 정기학술대회 발표 자료집 (2009)
  5. 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2016), 한국문화사
  6. 조미희, "국어 보조동사 의미의 주관화- ‘-어 놓다, -어 두다’, ‘-어 버리다, -어 치우다’ 쌍을 중심으로 -", 형태론, 15(1), pp.35~54 (2013), 형태론
  7. 폴 하퍼, "문법화" (1999), 한산문화사
  8. 피터 그런디, "화용론의 실제" (2016), 커뮤니케이션북스
  9. 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (1996), 商務印書館
  10. 叶經韬, "疑难字詞辨析集" (1986), 辭書出版社
  11. 朴奎荣, "談‘V掉’中‘掉’的意义", 漢語學習, (5) (2000)
  12. 沈家煊, "语言的主观性和主观化", 外语教学与研究(外国语文双月刊, 33(5) (2001)
  13. 詹全旺, "英語增强詞terribly的主觀化一項基于語料庫的硏究", 外國語, 32(5) (2009)
  14. 張玉金, "全功能漢語常用字字典" (2000), 遼海出版社
  15. 周磊磊, "‘V掉’的語法意义及其他", 六安师師专學報, (2) (1999)
  16. Givóon, Talmy, "Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archeologist’s field trip", Chicago Linguistics Society, 7 (1971)
  17. Traugott, "Subjectivity and Subjectivisation" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  18. "北京大學CCL語料庫"[URL]
  19. "臺灣中央硏究院의 漢籍電子文獻"[URL]
  20. "小學堂"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)