Determinants of Termination of Anti-dumping Measures: The Case of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper empirically examines what factors affected the termination of anti-dumping measures in Korea during the 2006-2019 period. Employing a meticulous literature review, the paper investigates the WTO’s and Korea’s rules on the termination of antidumping measures and sets up the related variables in the Cox proportional hazards model. The empirical results show that the GDP growth rate, employment, and trade competitiveness in domestic industries had positive effects on the hazard of the termination of AD measures, while free trade agreements had negative effects. By industry, the hazard of the termination of AD measures was less prominent in the steel industry, while it was more prominent in the machinery industry. These results imply that AD measures in Korea had the properties of a proper trade remedy policy and, at the same time, a protectionism tool to sustain its domestic industries, depending on industrial characteristics and other trade policies.
Abstract
This paper empirically examines what factors affected the termination of anti-dumping measures in Korea during the 2006-2019 period. Employing a meticulous literature review, the paper investigates the WTO’s and Korea’s rules on the termination of antidumping measures and sets up the related variables in the Cox proportional hazards model. The empirical results show that the GDP growth rate, employment, and trade competitiveness in domestic industries had positive effects on the hazard of the termination of AD measures, while free trade agreements had negative effects. By industry, the hazard of the termination of AD measures was less prominent in the steel industry, while it was more prominent in the machinery industry. These results imply that AD measures in Korea had the properties of a proper trade remedy policy and, at the same time, a protectionism tool to sustain its domestic industries, depending on industrial characteristics and other trade policies.
참고문헌 (40)
- Ahn, D., "Analysis of Anti-dumping Use in Free Trade Agreements", Journal of World Trade, 45(2), pp.431~456 (2011)
- The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Economic Performance in Korea, "Bae, C.", Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, ~, pp.KIEP Policy Reference, no. 12-03 (2012)
- Balassa, B, "Trade Liberalisation and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage", Manchester School, 33(2), pp.99~123 (1965)
- Becroft, R., "Trade Agreements at the Crossroads", pp.66~80 (2014), Routledge
- Besedes, T., "The Hazardous Effects of Antidumping", Economic Inquiry, 55(1), pp.9~30 (2017)
- Blonigen, B. A, "The Effects of NAFTA on Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Activity", World Bank Economic Review, 19(3), pp.407~424 (2005)
- Dumping and Antidumping Duties, "Blonigen, B. A.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, no. 21573 (2015)
- Bown, C. P., "Trade Liberalization, Antidumping, and Safeguards:Evidence from India’s TariffReform", Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), pp.115~125 (2011)
- Chang, C. -L., "US Antidumping Petitions and Revealed Comparative Advantage of Shrimp-exporting Countries", Reviews in Aquaculture, 11(3), pp.782~792 (2019)
- Chen, L., "Emerging Global Trade Governance:Mega Free Trade Agreements and Implications for ASEAN" (2019), Routledge
- 최낙균, "Did Anti-dumping Duties Really Restrict Import?: Empirical Evidence from the US, the EU, China, and India", East Asian Economic Review, 21(1), pp.3~27 (2017), 대외경제정책연구원[DOI]
- Analysis of Comparative Advantage Patterns and Its Policy Implications, "Choi, N.", Korea Institution for International Economic Policy, ~, pp.KIEP Policy Analysis, no. 10-01 (2010)
- Cox, D. R, "Regression Models and Life-Tables", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 34(2), pp.187~220 (1972)
- Egger, P., "How Bad Is Antidumping? Evidence from Panel Data", Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), pp.1374~1390 (2011)
- Comparison & Analysis of Anti-dumping Provisions in the FTAs signed by Korea, "Eom, J", Korea Institution for International Economic Policy, ~, pp.KIEP World Economy Update, no. 4-38 (2014)
- Firme, V., "Main Determinants of Opening Antidumping Cases: A Poisson Analysis Using Panel Data", International Trade Journal, 34(4), pp.387~414 (2020)
- Political Economy of Antidumping Reviews: The Impact of Discretion at the International Trade Administration, "Gourlay, S.", American University, ~, pp.Department of Economics Working Paper Series, no. 2012-15 (2012)
- Anti-dumping in the Doha Development Agenda, "International Chamber of Commerce(ICC)", ~, pp.Policy Statement Document, 103 (2007), 281 rev3 final EN
- 장용준, "The Impact of Input and Output Tariffs on Domestic Employment across Industries: Evidence from Korea", Journal of Korea Trade, 24(8), pp.1~18 (2020), 한국무역학회
- Krupp, C, "Antidumping Cases in the US Chemical Industry: A Panel Data Approach", Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(3), pp.299~311 (1994)
- Liu, X, "GATT", WTO Promotes Trade Strongly: Sample Selection and Model Specification, 2009, pp.17(3), 428~446
- Lorenz, M., "Winners Are Green, Smart, and Digital", BCG.com, Dec 11. Boston Consulting Group, ~ (2020)
- Matsushita, M., "The World Trade Organization : Law, Practice, and Policy" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Mavroidis, P. C., "Trade in Goods : The GATT and the Other WTO Agreements Regulating Trade in Goods" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Mercier, F., "Steel Market Developments Q2 2021", OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation, DSTI, FINAL. OECD, pp.2021, ~
- Moore, M. O, "An Econometric Analysis of U.S. Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions", Review of World Economics, 142(1), pp.122~150 (2006)
- Mukherjee, P. M., "Global Competitiveness in the Steel Industry", Asia-Pacific Business Review, 6(4), pp.12~17 (2010)
- Müeller, W., "EC and WTO Anti-Dumping Law : A Handbook" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Oliveira, G. A. S, "Industrial Determinants of Anti-dumping in Brazil – Protection, Competition and Performance: An Analysis with Binary Dependent Variable and Panel Data", EconomiA, 15(2), pp.206~227 (2014)
- Rutkowski, A, "Determinants of Withdrawals of Anti‐Dumping Complaints in the EU", Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 10(2), pp.89~109 (2007)
- Saltykova, Y, "The Chinese Steel Market Transformation Influenced by the Economic Recession", IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (650) (2021), IOPscience
- Sandkamp, A, "The Trade Effects of Antidumping Duties: Evidence from the 2004 EU Enlargement", Journal of International Economics, 123, pp.1~18 (2020)
- 손기윤, "Assessment of Korea’s FTAs: Focusing on Trade Remedies Rules", Journal of Korea Trade, 24(7), pp.107~124 (2020), 한국무역학회
- Sudsawasd, S, "TariffLiberalization and the Rise of Anti-dumping Use: Empirical Evidence from Across World Regions", International Trade Journal, 26(1), pp.4~18 (2012)
- Vandenbussche, H., "What Explains the Proliferation of Antidumping Laws?", Economic Policy, 23(53), pp.94~138 (2008)
- Vermulst, E., "The WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement : A Commentary" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Wall, H. J, "Using the Gravity Model to Estimate the Costs of Protection", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 81(1), pp.33~40 (1999)
- Wooldridge, J., "Introductory Econometrics : A Modern Approach" (2016), Cengage Learning
- Yotov, Y. V., "An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis : The Structural Gravity Model", World Trade Organization; United Nations, ~ (2016)
- 유재선, "The Qualitative Trade Competitiveness of China in IT Industry: A Comparison to Korea and USA", Journal of Korea Trade, 23(3), pp.20~37 (2019), 한국무역학회[DOI]