『日語類解』의 일본어 語法에 대하여 - 동사․형용사․형용동사를 중심으로 -
On the Usage of Japanese Langage in the Nichigoruikai - Centered on the Verb, Adjective, and Adjective Verb -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, the writer surveyed and analyzed the differences of the orthography for using the verb, the adjective and the adjective verb between the Wagoruikai and the Nichigoruikai. At the result, the writer surveyed that the verb of the above 2nd column in the Wagoruikai is revised and written as the verb of the above 1st column and below 1st column in the Nichigoruikai. And this verb is written as an irregular verb of ナ line in the Wagoruikai but it is appeared as a revised form of th 5th column regular verb of ナ line in the Nichigoruikai. The サ irregular complex verb of the Wagoruikai, which is come from the one of the Chinese Language stems, is appeared as an example word revised into the verb of the above 1st column in the Nichigoruikai and then the サ irregular complex verb of the Wagoruikai is expressed as a language of Kamikadai(上方語) and the revised verb of the above 1st column in the Nichigoruikai is an example of reflecting the language of Eto(江戶語). There are two kinds of diphthong, [-ou] and [-au] of the verbs in the Wagoruikai. The [-ou]in the Wagoruikai is reflecting the language of Kamikadai(上方語) and the [-au] in the Wagoruikai is originally an old form but it is revised through [-ou], [-oo] and then returned as [-au], reflecting a language of Kamikadai. There are many examples of [-ou] forms of the diphthong verb in the Wagoruikai and the [-au] revised form of the diphthong verb in the Nichigoruikai. These two kinds of verb having [-ou] and [-au] in the Wagoruikai was revised at the time of writing the MJD, because, at the time of compiling the Nichigoruikai, the compile of the diction contained the usages as centered on the language in the area of Tokyo and then these two kinds of diphthong were all united as the only one [-au]. In the forms of adjective, the form of the 「-し」 ending of the シク inflective adjective, the form of model 「-しい」 having the イ sound, and the form of the model 「-い」 having the イ sound of the ending 「-し」 of the ク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai are also appeared as the same examples of 「-しい」 and 「-い」 forms in the Nichigoruikai. The 「-し」 ending form of シク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the form of 「-しい」 in the Nichigoruikai, and the 「-し」 ending form of the ク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the form of 「-い」 in the Nichigoruikai. These revised forms are thought that in the time of compiling Nichigoruikai the general forms of adjective endings had 「-い」. The 「-しき」 form of the model form of シク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the 「-しい」 form having イ sound ending and in the Nichigoruikai and the 「-き」form of the model form of ク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the form of 「-い」 in the Nichigoruikai. These reforms are reflecting that the modern usages of Japan language is all revised in the time of compiling the Nichigoruikai. The example of inflective verb rewritten in the stem of descriptive verb of Japanese language which is nearly same as the inflective verb using the なり form of the Chinese language and the example of the 「-い」 of inflective verb are also described as the same forms in the both Wagoruikai and Nichigoruikai. The adjective verb of Japanese which is nearly same as the entry word of the Chinese is written as the only form of the stem in the Wagoruikai, but the form is written as the revised model form of [stem +な] of the adjective verb in the Nichigoruikai. These revised forms are difficult to think that the frequent degree of using the word in the time of compiling Nichigoruikai was rewritten. The Japanese 「壯」 which was come from the entry word of the Chinese is written as 「-なる」 of the inflective form of the adjective verb in the Wagoruikai, but it was revised as the generalized form of [stem +な] in the Nichigoruikai and the inflective form of 「-なる」 which is the same as the 「貧」 is written as the revised inflective complex word of サ. And the inflective form of the adjective verb had the form of [the stem +な] in the Nichigoruikai, and [the stem +な] is same in the Nichigoruikai. But even if the entry word of the Chinese language is same in the both dictionary, the stem word of Japanese is revised as the other word form. These examples are thought to be revised, reflecting the Japanese language at the time of the compiling Nichigoruikai.
Abstract
In this paper, the writer surveyed and analyzed the differences of the orthography for using the verb, the adjective and the adjective verb between the Wagoruikai and the Nichigoruikai. At the result, the writer surveyed that the verb of the above 2nd column in the Wagoruikai is revised and written as the verb of the above 1st column and below 1st column in the Nichigoruikai. And this verb is written as an irregular verb of ナ line in the Wagoruikai but it is appeared as a revised form of th 5th column regular verb of ナ line in the Nichigoruikai. The サ irregular complex verb of the Wagoruikai, which is come from the one of the Chinese Language stems, is appeared as an example word revised into the verb of the above 1st column in the Nichigoruikai and then the サ irregular complex verb of the Wagoruikai is expressed as a language of Kamikadai(上方語) and the revised verb of the above 1st column in the Nichigoruikai is an example of reflecting the language of Eto(江戶語). There are two kinds of diphthong, [-ou] and [-au] of the verbs in the Wagoruikai. The [-ou]in the Wagoruikai is reflecting the language of Kamikadai(上方語) and the [-au] in the Wagoruikai is originally an old form but it is revised through [-ou], [-oo] and then returned as [-au], reflecting a language of Kamikadai. There are many examples of [-ou] forms of the diphthong verb in the Wagoruikai and the [-au] revised form of the diphthong verb in the Nichigoruikai. These two kinds of verb having [-ou] and [-au] in the Wagoruikai was revised at the time of writing the MJD, because, at the time of compiling the Nichigoruikai, the compile of the diction contained the usages as centered on the language in the area of Tokyo and then these two kinds of diphthong were all united as the only one [-au]. In the forms of adjective, the form of the 「-し」 ending of the シク inflective adjective, the form of model 「-しい」 having the イ sound, and the form of the model 「-い」 having the イ sound of the ending 「-し」 of the ク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai are also appeared as the same examples of 「-しい」 and 「-い」 forms in the Nichigoruikai. The 「-し」 ending form of シク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the form of 「-しい」 in the Nichigoruikai, and the 「-し」 ending form of the ク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the form of 「-い」 in the Nichigoruikai. These revised forms are thought that in the time of compiling Nichigoruikai the general forms of adjective endings had 「-い」. The 「-しき」 form of the model form of シク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the 「-しい」 form having イ sound ending and in the Nichigoruikai and the 「-き」form of the model form of ク inflective adjective in the Wagoruikai is revised as the form of 「-い」 in the Nichigoruikai. These reforms are reflecting that the modern usages of Japan language is all revised in the time of compiling the Nichigoruikai. The example of inflective verb rewritten in the stem of descriptive verb of Japanese language which is nearly same as the inflective verb using the なり form of the Chinese language and the example of the 「-い」 of inflective verb are also described as the same forms in the both Wagoruikai and Nichigoruikai. The adjective verb of Japanese which is nearly same as the entry word of the Chinese is written as the only form of the stem in the Wagoruikai, but the form is written as the revised model form of [stem +な] of the adjective verb in the Nichigoruikai. These revised forms are difficult to think that the frequent degree of using the word in the time of compiling Nichigoruikai was rewritten. The Japanese 「壯」 which was come from the entry word of the Chinese is written as 「-なる」 of the inflective form of the adjective verb in the Wagoruikai, but it was revised as the generalized form of [stem +な] in the Nichigoruikai and the inflective form of 「-なる」 which is the same as the 「貧」 is written as the revised inflective complex word of サ. And the inflective form of the adjective verb had the form of [the stem +な] in the Nichigoruikai, and [the stem +な] is same in the Nichigoruikai. But even if the entry word of the Chinese language is same in the both dictionary, the stem word of Japanese is revised as the other word form. These examples are thought to be revised, reflecting the Japanese language at the time of the compiling Nichigoruikai.
참고문헌 (25)
- 池上禎造, "言語生活硏究の一意義", 国語國文, pp.6~ (1954)
- 小倉進平, "朝鮮語學史" (1964), 刀江書院
- 金澤庄三郞, "日語類解" (1903), 三省堂書店
- 北原保雄, "日本文法事典" (1982), 有精堂
- 京都大學文學部, "倭語類解 本文,國語,漢字索引" (1958), 京都大學文學部國語學國文學硏究室
- 京都大學文學部國語學國文學硏究室, "兒學編․日語類解․韓語初步" (1970), 京都大學國文學會
- 佐藤喜代治, "國語學硏究事典5版" (1983), 明治書院
- 佐藤武義, "概説日本語の歴史", pp.103~ (1995), 朝倉書店
- 성희경, "日語類解의 日本漢字音의 性格과 記載方法에 대하여", 日本學報, 43 (1999), 韓國日本學會
- 成慶, "『兒學編』과 『日語類解』의 日本漢字音의 淸濁音에 관해서", 동북아 문화연구, 1(11), pp.337~353 (2006), 동북아시아문화학회
- 成?慶, "近世?近代의 한글資料에 보이는 日本漢字音의 淸濁音에 관하여", 일본어문학, (39), pp.93~112 (2007), 일본어문학회
- 성희경, "『일어유해』의 일본어 기재방법에 대하여 - 『왜어유해』의 일본어와의 비교를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(20), pp.83~101 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
- 성희경, "『日語類解』의 일본어 표기와 음운에 대하여", 동북아 문화연구, 1(24), pp.61~76 (2010), 동북아시아문화학회
- 鄭光, "諸本集成 倭語類解<解說, 國語索引影印, 本文 索引>" (1988), 太學社
- 鄭光, "司譯院 倭學 硏究" (1988), 太學社
- 土井忠生, "邦譯日葡辭書" (1980), 岩波書店
- 濱田敦, "国語音韻体系に於ける長音の位置", 国語学, 22 (1955)
- 濱田敦, "倭語類解考", 國語國文, 28(9), pp.1~48 (1959)
- 濱田敦, "朝鮮資料による日本語硏究" (1970), 岩波書店
- 濱田敦, "續国朝鮮資料による日本語硏究", pp.111~123 (1983), 臨川書店
- 濱田敦, "国語史の諸問題", pp.104~105 (1986), 和泉書院刊
- 松村明, "近代の國語-江戶から現代まで-", pp.105~ (1977), 櫻楓社
- 安田章, "朝鮮資料と中世國語" (1980), 笠間書院
- 安田章, "外國資料と中世國語" (1990), 三省堂
- 山口明穂, "日本語の歴史", pp.129~130 (1997), 東京大学出版会
