일본어 형용사의 활용체계에 관한 제언
Proposal for the System of Adjective Conjugation in Japanese
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study pointed out problems about Japanese adjective conjugation. To bespecific, this paper checked the problems about adjective conjugation in Japaneseschool grammar and conjugation in Japanese education, and studied how to proposeit. School grammar proposes adjective conjugation's system just as verbal conjugation's. For example, the system of adjective conjugation, having 6 conjugated forms includingimperative form which is not for adjective, does not reflect features of the adjectiveproperly. In addition, the system of adjective conjugation in Japanese educationsuggests different forms to meet the goal for Japanese education. However, therehas limits to explain all the forms of adjectives. Moreover, there has been only fewattempts to criticize the system of adjective conjugation as well, unlike the systemof verbal conjugation has been studied a lot through conventional studies. Therefore, this study pointed out a problem about the discordance between theusage and name for the conjugation in school grammar. Besides, this study alsopointed out that it is not able to explain all the conjugation by the system of theJapanese education. To settle these problems, this study suggested a conjugationsystem by predicative function and modifier's function, considering adjective'sfunctional features. This attempt is meaningful in that how adjectives work in thetext was considered, not to simply learn the pattern of adjectives.
Abstract
This study pointed out problems about Japanese adjective conjugation. To bespecific, this paper checked the problems about adjective conjugation in Japaneseschool grammar and conjugation in Japanese education, and studied how to proposeit. School grammar proposes adjective conjugation's system just as verbal conjugation's. For example, the system of adjective conjugation, having 6 conjugated forms includingimperative form which is not for adjective, does not reflect features of the adjectiveproperly. In addition, the system of adjective conjugation in Japanese educationsuggests different forms to meet the goal for Japanese education. However, therehas limits to explain all the forms of adjectives. Moreover, there has been only fewattempts to criticize the system of adjective conjugation as well, unlike the systemof verbal conjugation has been studied a lot through conventional studies. Therefore, this study pointed out a problem about the discordance between theusage and name for the conjugation in school grammar. Besides, this study alsopointed out that it is not able to explain all the conjugation by the system of theJapanese education. To settle these problems, this study suggested a conjugationsystem by predicative function and modifier's function, considering adjective'sfunctional features. This attempt is meaningful in that how adjectives work in thetext was considered, not to simply learn the pattern of adjectives.
참고문헌 (22)
- 光村図書, "国語1" (2011)
- 東京書籍, "新しい国語" (2011)
- 新井洋一他, "新国語要覧" (2004), 大修館書店
- 오현정, "다이나믹 일본어문법" (2010), 다락원
- 이경수, "일본어문법의 달인이 되는 법" (2009), 사람in
- 정의상, "대한민국에서가장재밌는FUNFUN일본어문법" (2009), 시사일본어사
- 合田貞夫, "学校で教えてきている現代日本語の文法", pp.56~83 (2004), 右文書院
- 庵功雄, "新しい日本語学入門", pp.46~58 (2012), スリーエーネットワーク
- 市川保子, "初級日本語文法と教え方のポイント", pp.40~55 (2005), スリーエーネットワーク
- 木下謙郎, "韓国人日本語学習者の作文に見られるイ形容詞の誤用", 日本学報, 65, pp.253~262 (2005)
- 鈴木重幸, "文法と文法指導", pp.53~69 (1972), むぎ書房
- 鈴木重幸, "動詞の活用形ㆍ活用法をめぐって, In ことばの科学2", pp.109~134 (1989), むぎ書房
- 鈴木康之, "活用論をどう見直すか", 日本語学, 16(4), pp.39~45 (1997), 明治書院
- 高見澤孟, "新․はじめての日本語教育 日本語教育の基礎知識", pp.71~76 (2004), ask
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ", pp.27~62 (1984), くろしお出版
- 富田英夫, "日本語文法の焦点", pp.31~37 (2007), くろしお出版
- 日本語教育学会, "新版日本語教育事典", pp.71~77 (2005), 大修館書店
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法", pp.127~131 (2010), くろしろ出版
- 橋本進吉, "国文法体系論", pp.366~400 (1959), 岩波書店
- 森山卓郎, "『形重視』から『意味重視』の文法教育―21世紀の学校文法にむけて―", 日本語学, 16(4), pp.8~17 (1997), 明治書院
- 山田敏弘, "国語教師が知っておきたい日本語文法", pp.14~25 (2004), くろしろ出版
- 장근수, "일본어 동사활용형의 명칭과 제시 방안에 관한 분석", 일본언어문화, 21(21), pp.109~125 (2012), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
