霞谷學의 특징
The Characteristic of Ha Gok Studies
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper has been willing to arrange the regional term of Kanghwa Yang Ming School of Korea for the term as Ha Gok studies. Ha Gok, Chung, Che Doo is prescribed as the right wing of Yang Ming School, but he is influenced by the thought of Wang ji and Na, Ru Fang. It means that he has understanding Yang Ming’s younger scholars. Besides, Chung, Che Doo’s writings of the study of Chinese classics is valuated as an attempt for achieving the interpretation of Yang Ming Studies rather than the working of Zhu Xi. Chung, Che Doo has been trying to unite critically the right wing and the left wing among the Chinese Yang Ming Studies. That is, Chung, Che Doo has not taken Yang Ming’s younger scholars just, but he taken it selective. Ha Gok scholars mainly inherits from the tradition of Yang Ming, however they contrive compromising Yang Ming and Zhu Xi or they have a point of view to support Zhu Xi. Furthermore they have the Philology school’ thought. It has been able to understand the varieties of Ha Gok scholars
Abstract
This paper has been willing to arrange the regional term of Kanghwa Yang Ming School of Korea for the term as Ha Gok studies. Ha Gok, Chung, Che Doo is prescribed as the right wing of Yang Ming School, but he is influenced by the thought of Wang ji and Na, Ru Fang. It means that he has understanding Yang Ming’s younger scholars. Besides, Chung, Che Doo’s writings of the study of Chinese classics is valuated as an attempt for achieving the interpretation of Yang Ming Studies rather than the working of Zhu Xi. Chung, Che Doo has been trying to unite critically the right wing and the left wing among the Chinese Yang Ming Studies. That is, Chung, Che Doo has not taken Yang Ming’s younger scholars just, but he taken it selective. Ha Gok scholars mainly inherits from the tradition of Yang Ming, however they contrive compromising Yang Ming and Zhu Xi or they have a point of view to support Zhu Xi. Furthermore they have the Philology school’ thought. It has been able to understand the varieties of Ha Gok scholars
참고문헌 (37)
- 이상호, "정제두 양명학의 양명우파적 특징", 박사, pp.2004
- 岡前武彦, "왕양명과 명말의 유학" (1970), 明德出版社
- 林月惠, "良知學의 轉折-雙江與羅念庵思想之硏究" (2005), 臺大出版中心
- 中純夫, "양지수증파에 관하여", 富山大學敎養部紀要, 22(1) (1989)
- 吳震, "豹 羅洪先評傳" (2001), 남경대학출판부
- 이경룡, "17세기 後陽明學과 霞谷學의 定位", 양명학, (15), pp.229~268 (2005), 한국양명학회
- 張學智, "明代哲學史", pp.208~212, 北京大學出版社
- 이병도, "한국유학사", pp.380~
- 鵬程, "韓國陽明學者鄭齊斗的經世思想", 第4回 霞谷學國際學術大會, pp.41~42 (2007)
- 彭國祥, "本体与工夫：郑霞谷与王龙溪合论", 第3回 霞谷學國際學術大會發表文, pp.16~ (2006)
- 나여방, "양지에서 생리와 신리로 전환", 한국양명학회 2008 봄 학술대회 발표문 (2008)
- "하곡집", ~
- 질 들뢰즈, "에티카", pp.152~153 (2006), 책세상
- "전습록", ~
- "谿谷集 권2"
- 남상호, "하곡 정제두의 中極論", 양명학, (13), pp.100~138 (2005), 한국양명학회
- 유명종, "한국의 양명학", 동화출판공사
- 최제목, "하곡 정제두", 예문서원
- "답신백겸 in: 한수재집 권11"
- 다카하시, "조선의 유학", 소나무
- 조남호, "정제두의 황극론 고찰", 양명학, (16), pp.187~208 (2006), 한국양명학회
- 윤남한, "하곡학의 기본방향과 단계성 in: 하곡 정제두", pp.69~, 예문서원
- 윤남한, "조선시대양명학연구", pp.38~ (1986), 집문당
- 이경룡, "나근계선생어록휘집" (2006), 신성출판사
- 임선영, "하곡 정제두의 양명학적 중용이해", 한국철학논집, (13)
- 鄭寅普, "陽明學演論", pp.164~ (1975), 三星文化財團
- 이형성, "고교형의 조선양명학사 연구와 그 극복", 한국철학논집, 7 (1999)
- 민영규, "강화학 최후의 광경", pp.88~, 우반
- 中純夫, "초기 양명학파의 양명학 수용", 제1회 강화양명학파 국제학술대회 자료집, pp.290~
- 심경호, "강화학파의 가학(假學) 비판", 양명학, (13), pp.245~282 (2005), 한국양명학회
- "啓明義塾趣旨書", 韓國學報, 6 (1977)
- 정인보, "양명학연론", pp.148~149
- 박연수, "양명학의 이해", pp.255~, 집문당
- 민영규, "위당 정인보 선생의 행장에 나타난 몇 가지 문제", 東方學誌, 13
- 이건창, "조선의 마지막 문장", pp.72~81 (2008), 글항아리
- "宛丘遺集"
- 니빈슨, "유학의 두 갈래길", pp.43~, 철학과 현실사