동아시아에 떠도는 김옥균 서사 ― 김옥균 연구의 서설 ―
Narratives involving Kim Ok-kyun(金玉均), floating in East Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, the Gabshin-year Coup, which was a very important event that marked the transformation of the very Modern period of Korea, and a person named Kim Ok-kyun who personally led that coup, are examined in order to reevaluate his actions and the meaning of this incident from an East Asian perspective, instead of a national perspective based upon the conditions of an isolated country. Since 1884 when the Coup took place, various entities from Japan, Korea and Chinese Qing dynasty have created all kinds of narratives regarding Kim Ok-kyun. The ‘Asianists’ in Japan portrayed Kim Ok-kyun as an extraordinary revolutionist and a tragic figure who had wonderful dreams, and they used his tragic death as a catalyst for the Sino-Japanese war. On the other hand, inside the Qing dynasty very negative narratives regarding Kim Ok-kyun floated around. As we can see from <Jeomseokjae Hwabo> which was published in Shanghai, Kim Ok-kyun was described as a very negative bad guy and a threatening official to the King. Kim Ok-kyun narratives became an important motif in political novels and romantic plays in Japan during the Meiji era. Tracing the Kim Ok-kyun narratives that appeared in Meiji literature could provide us with important connections between them and Korean modern narrative literature. After Kim Ok-kyun’s honor was restored in 1894 by the Gabo Reform regime, Kim Ok-kyun was reinstated from a pro-Japanese figure and a treacherous vassal to the King, and was transformed into a modern visionary. He was also worshipped as a ‘Grand Asianist’ during the early 1940s, the National literature period.
Abstract
In this article, the Gabshin-year Coup, which was a very important event that marked the transformation of the very Modern period of Korea, and a person named Kim Ok-kyun who personally led that coup, are examined in order to reevaluate his actions and the meaning of this incident from an East Asian perspective, instead of a national perspective based upon the conditions of an isolated country. Since 1884 when the Coup took place, various entities from Japan, Korea and Chinese Qing dynasty have created all kinds of narratives regarding Kim Ok-kyun. The ‘Asianists’ in Japan portrayed Kim Ok-kyun as an extraordinary revolutionist and a tragic figure who had wonderful dreams, and they used his tragic death as a catalyst for the Sino-Japanese war. On the other hand, inside the Qing dynasty very negative narratives regarding Kim Ok-kyun floated around. As we can see from <Jeomseokjae Hwabo> which was published in Shanghai, Kim Ok-kyun was described as a very negative bad guy and a threatening official to the King. Kim Ok-kyun narratives became an important motif in political novels and romantic plays in Japan during the Meiji era. Tracing the Kim Ok-kyun narratives that appeared in Meiji literature could provide us with important connections between them and Korean modern narrative literature. After Kim Ok-kyun’s honor was restored in 1894 by the Gabo Reform regime, Kim Ok-kyun was reinstated from a pro-Japanese figure and a treacherous vassal to the King, and was transformed into a modern visionary. He was also worshipped as a ‘Grand Asianist’ during the early 1940s, the National literature period.
참고문헌 (54)
- 김용구, "임오군란과 갑신정변－사대질서의 변형과 한국 외교사" (2004), 도서출판원
- 山邊健太郞, "『甲申日錄』の一硏究", 朝鮮學報, 17 (1960)
- 이나영, "1880년대 초의 개화사상과 개화파들의 1884(갑신)정변에 대하여 in:력사론문집 1" (1961), 과학원 력사연구소
- 이광린, "북한 학계에서의 金玉均 연구, in: 韓國近現代史論攷", pp.230~231 (1999), 일조각
- 原田環, "일본에 있어서의 갑신정변의 연구", 한국정치외교사논총, 1 (1985), 한국정치외교사학회
- 왕현종, "근대화 운동의 전개: 갑신정변과 갑오개혁, in:새로운 한국사 길잡이下" (2008), 지식산업사
- 박은숙, "갑신정변 연구" (2005), 역사비평사
- 주진오, "1884년 정변의 정치구조 개편구상", 역사와 현실, 47(47), pp.217~243 (2003), 한국역사연구회
- "承政院日記 8", 72~73
- "高宗實錄", 60~
- 김용구, "만국공법", pp.126~153 (2008), 소화
- 정용화, "문명의 정치사상: 유길준과 근대 한국", pp.219~ (2004), 문학과지성사
- 김태웅, "일제 강점기 김옥균 추앙과 위인교육", 역사교육, 74 (2000), 역사교육연구회
- 공임순, "식민지의 적자들" (2005), 푸른역사
- 다케우치 요시미, "일본의 아시아주의, in:일본과 아시아-다케우치 요시미 평론선" (2004), 소명출판
- 黑龍會, "東亞先覺志士記傳 3", pp.282~796 (1933), 原書房
- 야스카와 류노스케(安川壽之輔), "福澤諭吉のアジア認識" (2000), 高文硏
- 황호덕, "근대 네이션과 그 표상들―타자·교통·번역·에크리튀르", pp.233~248 (2005), 소명출판
- 박종명, "명치시사소설과 한국: 『長嬪』을 중심으로", 論文集, 20 (1996), 건국대학교 교육연구소
- 이노우에 가쿠고로, "漢城之殘夢, in: 서울에 남겨둔 꿈" (1993), 건국대학교출판부
- 藤田治明, "文明実地演説", pp.92~95 (1887), 松成堂
- 김도태, "徐載弼博士自敍傳" (1948), 自善社
- 宮崎龍介, "金玉均先生を懷ふ, in:宮崎滔天全集 4", pp.283~ (1971), 平凡社
- 李憲柱, "제2차 修信使의 활동과 『朝鮮策略』의 도입", 韓國史學報, 25(25), pp.285~325 (2006), 고려사학회
- 이광린, "김옥균의 『甲申日錄』에 대하여, in:開化黨硏究", pp.118~ (1973), 일조각
- 鷄林冷血生, "醒世小說" (1911), 上海書局
- "국역본 『淸史稿』 卷526, 朝鮮列傳 第313"[URL]
- 연구를 위한 서설, "중국현대문학", 2004, 319~350, pp.한국중국현대문학학회
- 홍석표, "點石齋畵報의 조선 재현 양상과 중화주의적 욕망", 중국어문학지, 21(21), pp.229~258 (2006), 중국어문학회
- "온라인點石齋畵報"[URL]
- 黃勇, "回眸晩淸－點石齋畵報精選釋評", pp.16~31 (2006), 京華出版社
- 발터 라이퍼, "묄렌도르프가 본 갑신정변, in:갑신정변연구" (1985), 평민사
- F. H. 뫼르젤, "갑신정변 회상기", 역사연구, 9 (2001), 역사학연구소
- Foulk, George Clayton, "America’s man in Korea: the private letters of George C. Foulk, 1884~1887", Lexington Books, ~ (2008)
- Foulk, George Clayton, "Inside the hermit kingdom: the 1884 Korea travel diary of George Clayton Foulk", Lexington Books, ~ (2008)
- H. N. 알렌, "알렌의 일기" (1991), 단국대학교출판부
- 퍼시벌 로우웰, "조선의 쿠데타, in:퍼시벌 로우웰" (2004), 대광문화사
- 臼井勝美, "日本近現代人名辭典", pp.503~ (2007), 吉川弘文館
- 김윤식, "金玉均과 東海散士", 문학사상, pp.242~ (1977)
- 박종명, "김옥균과 명치정치소설", 비교문학, 15 (1990)
- 飯田三郞, "自序, in:こぼれ梅", pp.1~2 (1894), 鳳林館
- 坂本泰, "大泊之沿革と人物", pp.78~79 (1921), 三品昌光
- 이광린, "김옥균: 삼일천하로 끝난 개혁 풍운아", pp.164~ (1994), 동아일보사
- 이광린, "김옥균: 초기 근대화의 기수", 계간사상, (겨울) (1991)
- 한철호, "개화·일제강점기 김옥균에 대한 역사적 평가", 호서사학, (38), pp.33~60 (2004), 호서사학회
- "梅泉野錄 卷二"
- 황현, "역주 매천야록 상", pp.427~ (2005), 문학과지성사
- "高宗純宗實錄 下 卷四", ~
- 이인직, "銀世界", pp.55~ (1978), 아세아문화사
- 최원식, "銀世界 硏究, in:民族文學의 論理" (1982), 창작과비평사
- 白岳, "創造 7호", ~ (1920)
- 김태웅, "일제 강점기 김진구의 활동과 내선일체론", 역사연구, 13 (2003), 역사학연구소
- 김기진, "大亞細亞主義와 金玉均先生", 朝光, 7(11) (1941)
- 뉴라이트재단, "대안 교과서 한국근·현대사" (2008), 기파랑