19세기 조선의 출판문화 - 관찬서(官撰書)의 간행을 중심으로 -
The Culture of Publication in Joseon in the 19th century - Study of the books published by the government -
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, the culture of publication that prevailed in the 19th century Joseon will be examined, by studying some books published by the government. It was not an easy job to come up with a responsible claim, that there have indeed been some problems in the scholars’ perspective viewing the history of the 19th century, especially in terms of the publication culture of the time. Compared to the 18th century, when publication was a highly invigorated practice, and the government was more than eager to produce books that would reflect the information and knowledge accumulated at the time, publication was interestingly showing somewhat of a downfall, in the 19th century. And even the books that were published, were mere reiterations of what people were already aware of, the general knowledge of Neo-Confucian, which was no longer able to provide solutions for the people and the era. Yet at the same time, some of the nobility houses located in the capital region were starting to exhibit some ‘highly decorated’ publications(at least in their exteriors), by using personally created printing blocks, or publishing personal anthologies before one even died. And under the influence of the Chinese Qing culture, not only paper, but also document formats of China were imported from the outside as well. The state’s capability of accumulating and processing information was indeed deteriorating, yet the capital aristocracy class was more actively engaging themselves in private and “high-class” publication, thus creating a new kind of ‘publication culture.’The government at the time did try to expand its windows for the absorption of information, especially not only from China but also from Japan, and official publication concerning diplomatic relationships with other countries in the world actually increased, as contacts with those countries were being subsequently made. Yet it should also be noted that such phenomena was accompanied by another trend of publication mentioned above, which was concentrated too much upon publishing books related to Chinese classics(經書) and ritual protocols(禮書). With the publication increase since the 17th century, and even with the temporary decline in the 19th century, publication was still serving as a method of distribution, for knowledge and information. Knowledge was spreaded throughout the public, information became more and more secularized, and people started to own those knowledge as ‘the knowledge of the Joseon people(朝鮮化).’ Not only the nobility houses, but also people of the commoner class, started to generally practice Confucian-style memorial services, and some of them even tried to officialize themselves as descendants of some Yangban houses, by committing forgeries to existing genealogical records of certain prominent lineages. Publication was no longer the sole privilege of the upper class. Even the people who pursued the preservation of orthodox Neo-Confucianism attempted to adapt their learning to the Joseon condition. 『Gukjo Daehak Yeon’eui/國朝大學衍義』 was a book that replaced all the Chinese episodes originally inserted in 『Daehak Yeon’eui/大學衍義(published to enlighten the emperors)』, with ‘Joseon episodes.’ And 『Geunsa-sok’rok/近思續錄』 was a book that replaced the ‘Five Masters of the Northern Sung period’ originally described in 『Geunsa-rok/近思錄(the primary manual of Neo-Confucianism)』, with ‘Joseon’ Confucian scholars. Joseon was now able to provide its own citizens with historical knowledge and solutions for current dilemmas.
Abstract
In this article, the culture of publication that prevailed in the 19th century Joseon will be examined, by studying some books published by the government. It was not an easy job to come up with a responsible claim, that there have indeed been some problems in the scholars’ perspective viewing the history of the 19th century, especially in terms of the publication culture of the time. Compared to the 18th century, when publication was a highly invigorated practice, and the government was more than eager to produce books that would reflect the information and knowledge accumulated at the time, publication was interestingly showing somewhat of a downfall, in the 19th century. And even the books that were published, were mere reiterations of what people were already aware of, the general knowledge of Neo-Confucian, which was no longer able to provide solutions for the people and the era. Yet at the same time, some of the nobility houses located in the capital region were starting to exhibit some ‘highly decorated’ publications(at least in their exteriors), by using personally created printing blocks, or publishing personal anthologies before one even died. And under the influence of the Chinese Qing culture, not only paper, but also document formats of China were imported from the outside as well. The state’s capability of accumulating and processing information was indeed deteriorating, yet the capital aristocracy class was more actively engaging themselves in private and “high-class” publication, thus creating a new kind of ‘publication culture.’The government at the time did try to expand its windows for the absorption of information, especially not only from China but also from Japan, and official publication concerning diplomatic relationships with other countries in the world actually increased, as contacts with those countries were being subsequently made. Yet it should also be noted that such phenomena was accompanied by another trend of publication mentioned above, which was concentrated too much upon publishing books related to Chinese classics(經書) and ritual protocols(禮書). With the publication increase since the 17th century, and even with the temporary decline in the 19th century, publication was still serving as a method of distribution, for knowledge and information. Knowledge was spreaded throughout the public, information became more and more secularized, and people started to own those knowledge as ‘the knowledge of the Joseon people(朝鮮化).’ Not only the nobility houses, but also people of the commoner class, started to generally practice Confucian-style memorial services, and some of them even tried to officialize themselves as descendants of some Yangban houses, by committing forgeries to existing genealogical records of certain prominent lineages. Publication was no longer the sole privilege of the upper class. Even the people who pursued the preservation of orthodox Neo-Confucianism attempted to adapt their learning to the Joseon condition. 『Gukjo Daehak Yeon’eui/國朝大學衍義』 was a book that replaced all the Chinese episodes originally inserted in 『Daehak Yeon’eui/大學衍義(published to enlighten the emperors)』, with ‘Joseon episodes.’ And 『Geunsa-sok’rok/近思續錄』 was a book that replaced the ‘Five Masters of the Northern Sung period’ originally described in 『Geunsa-rok/近思錄(the primary manual of Neo-Confucianism)』, with ‘Joseon’ Confucian scholars. Joseon was now able to provide its own citizens with historical knowledge and solutions for current dilemmas.
참고문헌 (54)
- 권오영, "영조의 帝王學 학습과 정치이념, In 영조의 국가정책과 정치이념", pp.103~122 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원
- 규장각, "통문관지", ~
- 金鉉權, "김정희파의 한중회화교류와 19세기 조선의 화단", 박사, pp.2010
- 김덕령, "金忠壯公遺事(5권)", ~
- 김백철, "英祖의 義理明辯書『闡義昭鑑』 편찬과 정국변화 : 堯舜의 두 가지 얼굴, 탕평군주와 전제군주의 경계", 정신문화연구, 33(4), pp.7~40 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원
- 김영진, "조선후기 중국사행과 서책문화, In 19세기 조선 지식인의 문화지형도", pp.643~644 (2006), 한양대출판부
- 盧官汎, "19세기 후반 湖西山林의 位相과 ‘正學’運動 : 淵齋 宋秉璿(1836~1905)을 중심으로", 韓國史論, 38 (1997)
- 부길만, "조선시대 방각본 출판 연구" (2003), 서울출판미디어
- 辛承云, "유교사회의 출판문화 : 특히 조선시대의 문집 편찬과 간행을 중심으로", 大東文化硏究, 39, pp.371~373 (2001)
- 신양선, "19世紀의 書籍政策에 관한 硏究", 서지학연구, 10 (1994)
- 신양선, "조선후기 서지사 연구" (1996), 혜안출판사
- 연갑수, "고종 연간의 정치 변동과 규장각, In 규장각 그 역사와 문화의 재발견", pp.63~65 (2009), 서울대출판문화원
- 尹炳泰, "朝鮮後期의 活字와 冊" (1992), 범우사
- 윤정옥, "純祖·憲宗朝의 官撰?官印書籍에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1985
- 이광렬, "光海君代《東國新續三綱行實圖》편찬의 의의", 韓國史論, 53 (2007), 서울대 국사학과
- 이순신, "李忠武公全書(14권)"
- 이현진, "조선후기 단종 복위와 충신 현창", 사학연구, (98), pp.41~89 (2010), 한국사학회
- 임경업, "林忠愍公實記(5권)", ~
- 정재훈, "조선전기 유교정치사상연구" (2005), 태학사
- 정재훈, "조선시대의 학파와 사상" (2008), 신구문화사
- 정재훈, "조선의 국왕과 의례", pp.160~171 (2010), 지식산업사
- 정재훈, "18세기 국가운영체제의 재정비, In 정조와 정조시대", pp.220~223 (2011), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 鄭亨愚, "朝鮮時代 書誌史 硏究" (1983), 한국연구원
- 지두환, "제14장 한국예학의 변천과 예서 편찬, In 韓國儒學思想大系Ⅲ:哲學思想編(下)", pp.273~281 (2005), 한국국학진흥원
- "講筵說話(서울대 규장각한국학연구원소장, 奎 4057)", ~
- "經筵故事書進錄(서울대 규장각한국학연구원소장, 奎 1792)", ~
- "國朝大學衍義", ~
- "葵史 서울대 규장각소장본(가람古 951-D169g)", ~
- "近思續錄", ~
- "同文考略續", ~
- "同文彙考", ~
- "杜門洞錄(한국학중앙연구원 장서각 소장, B9C 173)", ~
- "痘疹會通", ~
- "萬國政表", ~
- "邊例輯要", ~
- "三綱錄續(서울대 규장각한국학연구원소장, 奎3069)", ~
- "樹烈千秋傳(서울대 규장각한국학연구원소장, 奎757)", ~
- "肅宗實錄", ~
- "純祖實錄", ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "時種通編", ~
- "時憲紀要", ~
- "御製古今年代龜鑑 서울대 규장각한국학연구원 소장본(奎1730)", ~
- "曹龜鑑 서울대 규장각소장본(經古 929.2-Y58y)", ~
- "英祖實錄", ~
- "仁祖實錄", ~
- "林忠愍公實記(서울대 규장각한국학연구원소장, 奎577)", ~
- "正祖實錄", ~
- "존주휘편", ~
- "增正交隣志", ~
- "철종실록", ~
- "忠義集傳(서울대 규장각한국학연구원소장, 奎3260)", ~
- "通文館志", ~
- "壺山外史 규장각소장본(奎6755)", ~
