도리이 류조(鳥居竜竜蔵)와 오카 마사오(岡正雄)의 일본민족 기원론- ‘문화전파’와 ‘민족이동’의 관점에서 -
A comparative study on Ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese Race by Ryuzo Torii and Masao Oka - From the Viewpoints of ‘Diffusion’ and ‘Migration’ -
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ryuzo Torii and Masao Oka were the representative researchers who advocated the ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese race before and after World War II. Although both of them thought that the Japanese race was the mixture of various races from East Asia, comparative studies of their ideas have yet to be made. This paper aimed at comparing their theories from a viewpoint of the sociology of knowledge with a focus on their interaction with historical contexts such as scientific trend of thought and current foreign relations, etc. For a touchstone or a criterion, I focused on their choice between 'migration' and 'diffusion' as the moment of explanation of the genealogy, with the former being associated with the direct genealogical relationship, and the latter with the indirect genealogical relationship. Since Japan of the 1910s, in which Torii's theory was announced, needed the logic which justifies assimilation of new territories, it was natural for Torii's theory to be influenced by a viewpoint of migration. Torii came to realize, however, the importance of cultural studies made popular by the investigation of Miao tribes, and turned the direction of research into diffusion. Meanwhile, in the postwar Japan, which abandoned colonies, asked for a new identity as a homogeneous nation, Oka's new theory was announced and Torii's theory was increasingly seen as a dangerous ideology. Although the historical situation almost compelled genealogical studies of the Japanese race towards viewpoint of diffusion, Oka also commented on migration cautiously. Because of restrictions that the current social atmosphere imposed on each researcher, Torii had to give seemingly cursory comments on diffusion while concentrating on migration and Oka had to give seemingly cursory attention to migration while concentrating on diffusion. This study, however, argues that what two researchers aimed at was almost the same in the last instance. Although Oka denied any academic tie with Torii, it is not too much to say that Oka was a real successor of Torii.
Abstract
Ryuzo Torii and Masao Oka were the representative researchers who advocated the ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese race before and after World War II. Although both of them thought that the Japanese race was the mixture of various races from East Asia, comparative studies of their ideas have yet to be made. This paper aimed at comparing their theories from a viewpoint of the sociology of knowledge with a focus on their interaction with historical contexts such as scientific trend of thought and current foreign relations, etc. For a touchstone or a criterion, I focused on their choice between 'migration' and 'diffusion' as the moment of explanation of the genealogy, with the former being associated with the direct genealogical relationship, and the latter with the indirect genealogical relationship. Since Japan of the 1910s, in which Torii's theory was announced, needed the logic which justifies assimilation of new territories, it was natural for Torii's theory to be influenced by a viewpoint of migration. Torii came to realize, however, the importance of cultural studies made popular by the investigation of Miao tribes, and turned the direction of research into diffusion. Meanwhile, in the postwar Japan, which abandoned colonies, asked for a new identity as a homogeneous nation, Oka's new theory was announced and Torii's theory was increasingly seen as a dangerous ideology. Although the historical situation almost compelled genealogical studies of the Japanese race towards viewpoint of diffusion, Oka also commented on migration cautiously. Because of restrictions that the current social atmosphere imposed on each researcher, Torii had to give seemingly cursory comments on diffusion while concentrating on migration and Oka had to give seemingly cursory attention to migration while concentrating on diffusion. This study, however, argues that what two researchers aimed at was almost the same in the last instance. Although Oka denied any academic tie with Torii, it is not too much to say that Oka was a real successor of Torii.
참고문헌 (25)
- 세키네히데유키, "도리이 류조(鳥居龍蔵) 일본민족 기원론에서의 남방계 민족 -민족이동의 관점에서-", 일본문화연구, (40), pp.257~279 (2011), 동아시아일본학회
- 세키네 히데유키, "오카 마사오(岡正雄) 일본 민족문화 기원론의 성립과 그 특징 -‘민족이동’의 관점에서 -", 일본문화연구, (37), pp.249~275 (2011), 동아시아일본학회
- 세키네히데유키, "일본문화의 원류로서의 남방계 문화연구 - ‘전파’와 ‘민족이동’에 대한 지식사회학적 접근 -", 일본문화연구, (31), pp.403~429 (2009), 동아시아일본학회
- 세키네히데유키, "한국인과 일본인의 계통연구와 패러다임", 민족문화연구, (47), pp.389~434 (2007), 민족문화연구원
- 石田英一郎, "解説 岡正雄 日本民族文化の形成-蓋然性をめぐる疑問- In 石田英一郎全集 第4巻", pp.249~252 (1970), 筑摩書房
- ヴィルヘルム, "民族と文化", pp.34~38 (1970), 河出書房新社
- 江上波夫, "日本民族文化の源流", pp.60~61 (1995), 講談社
- 大林太良, "解説 岡正雄 岡正雄 論文集 異人その他他十二編", pp.275~276 (1995), 岩波書店
- 大林太良, "鳥居竜蔵 In 文化人類学事典", pp.536~ (1994), 弘文堂
- 大林太良, "民俗移動 In 文化人類学事典", pp.751~ (1994), 弘文堂
- 大林太良, "歴史民族学 In 文化人類学事典", pp.834~835 (1994), 弘文堂
- 大林太良, "岡正雄と民族の世界史 In 世界の民族史Ⅰ 民族とは何か", pp.361~362 (1991), 山川出版社
- 大林太良, "鳥居龍蔵の日本民族形成論", 社会人類学報, 1, pp.121~132 (1975), 東京都立大学社会人類学会, 弘文堂
- 岡正雄, "異人その他 -日本民族=文化の源流と日本國家の形成-", pp.3~482 (1979), 叢文社
- 小熊英二, "単一民族神話の起源<日本人>の自画像の系譜", pp.339~340 (1995), 新曜社
- 坂野徹, "人種․民族․日本人 In 人種概念の普遍性を問う-西洋的パラダイムを越えて-", pp.231~234 (2005), 人文書院
- 住谷一彦, "岡正雄 古日本の文化層 In 異人その他 -日本民族=文化の源流と日本國家の形成-", pp.450~ (1979), 叢文社
- 田村晃一, "日本の基層文化の形成 In アジアからみた古代日本", pp.13~ (1992), 角川書店
- 寺田和夫, "日本の人類学", pp.73~74 (1975), 思索社
- 鳥居龍蔵, "鳥居龍蔵全集 第1巻", pp.167~559 (1975), 朝日新聞社
- 中薗英助, "鳥居龍蔵伝", pp.129~ (1995), 岩波書店
- 樋口隆康, "日本人はどこから來たか", pp.70~ (1971), 講談社
- ベルツ 池田次郎, "日本人の起原とその人種学的要素 In 論集 日本文化の起原5 人種論․言語学", pp.141~ (1973), 平凡社
- 三宅米吉, "日本史学提要 第一編", pp.23~25 (1886), 普及舎
- 矢野暢, "南進 の系譜 -日本の南洋史観", pp.11~125 (2009), 千倉書房
