「車崔二義士傳」에 드러난 尊明排淸論의 변화
An alteration of the ideology loyalty to the Ming and revenge on the Qing in the biography of Cha and Choi, Two Martyrs(車崔二義士傳)
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examined an phase of the ideology that revenge on the Qing Dynasty in the Joseon Dynasty during the late 18th century through analyzing the biography of Cha and Choi-two martyrs(車崔二義士傳) by Lee Ok(李鈺, 1760-1815). Choi Hyo-il had gone to the Qing Dynasty to revenge on the Qing and died beside the tomb of the Ming Dynasty’s emperor Yi-Zong(毅宗). As the icon of revenge on the Qing, the biographies of Choi Hyo-il had been kept interest through the 17th and 18th centuries by the intellectual class. Writing the biography of Cha and Choi-two martyrs, Lee Ok didn’t follow the ideology of revenge on the Qing Dynasty like any other writers. He didn’t devaluate the other martyrs made the dust fly to block the collapse of the Ming Dynasty, but denied unconditional revenge. The contradictional coexistence between revenge and study on the Qing Dynasty relies structurally in the text, the biography of Cha and Choi-two martyrs. It can be witnessed the unique and balanced point of view that of Lee Ok’s.
Abstract
This paper examined an phase of the ideology that revenge on the Qing Dynasty in the Joseon Dynasty during the late 18th century through analyzing the biography of Cha and Choi-two martyrs(車崔二義士傳) by Lee Ok(李鈺, 1760-1815). Choi Hyo-il had gone to the Qing Dynasty to revenge on the Qing and died beside the tomb of the Ming Dynasty’s emperor Yi-Zong(毅宗). As the icon of revenge on the Qing, the biographies of Choi Hyo-il had been kept interest through the 17th and 18th centuries by the intellectual class. Writing the biography of Cha and Choi-two martyrs, Lee Ok didn’t follow the ideology of revenge on the Qing Dynasty like any other writers. He didn’t devaluate the other martyrs made the dust fly to block the collapse of the Ming Dynasty, but denied unconditional revenge. The contradictional coexistence between revenge and study on the Qing Dynasty relies structurally in the text, the biography of Cha and Choi-two martyrs. It can be witnessed the unique and balanced point of view that of Lee Ok’s.
참고문헌 (28)
- 임유경, "李鈺의 <車崔二義士傳>의 구성과 문체상의 특징", 한국전통문화연구, 12, pp.15~ (1997), 대구가톨릭대학교 한국전통문화연구소
- 손민서, "이옥 「전」 연구 : 작가의식의 변모 양상을 중심으로", 석사, 고전문학, pp.2010
- 朴熙秉, "朝鮮後期 「傳」의 小說的 性向 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1991
- "차최이의사전", ~
- "正祖實錄", ~
- 이승수, "深河 戰役과 金將軍傳", 한국문학연구, 11(26), pp.23~53 (2003), 한국문학연구소
- 임완혁, "明.淸 交替期 朝鮮의 對應과 忠烈錄의 의미", 漢文學報, 12(1), pp.179~217 (2005), 우리한문학회
- 김유진, "죽음의 미화, 숭고의 미학 - 김응하 서사를 중심으로", 국문학연구, 25(25), pp.75~116 (2012), 국문학회
- 박희병, "17세기 초의 숭병배호론과 부정적 소설주인공의 등장, In 한국고전소설과 서사문학" (1998), 집문당
- "正祖實錄", ~
- 오수창, "朝鮮後期 平安道 社會發展 硏究", pp.93~97 (2002), 일조각
- "인조실록", ~
- 한명기, "정묘��병자호란과 동아시아", pp.180~184 (2009), 푸른역사
- 계승범, "정지된 시간: 조선의 대보단과 근대의 문턱" (2011), 서강대학교출판부
- 박경남, "林慶業 영웅상의 실체와 그 의미", 고전문학연구, 23, pp.8~238 (2003), 한국고전문학회
- 허태용, "조선후기 중화론과 역사의식", pp.121~134 (2006), 아카넷
- "황생전", ~
- 김수현, "朝鮮後期 敍事文學과 北伐論 : 북벌론의 추이와 문학적 형상화", 박사, 국문학전공, pp.2012
- 김수현, "寄軒 金琦 硏究", 고전문학연구, 24, pp.9~272 (2003), 한국고전문학회
- "漢書", ~
- "匈奴傳", ~
- 박준원, "朝鮮後期 傳의 事實收容樣相:燕巖·文無子·藫庭의 경우를 중심으로", 한국한문학연구, 12, pp.68~72 (1989)
- 이옥, "문묘이의복전"
- 李德壽, "西堂私載"
- 이승수, "西堂 李德壽의 對淸觀", 한국사상과 문화, (20), pp.69~100 (2003), 한국사상문화학회
- 임유경, "황경원의 <명배신전> 연구", 한국고전연구, 8 (2002)
- "성언", ~
- 김영진, "李鈺 硏究(1)-가계와 교유, 明․淸 小品 閱讀을 중심으로", 한문교육연구, 18 (2002)