MING LOYALIST FAMILIES AND THE CHANGING MEANINGS OF CHOJONG’AM IN EARLY NINETEENTH-CENTURY CHOSŎN
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The descendants of Ming loyalists who had migrated to Chosŏn with Prince Pongnim in 1645 were an integral part of the Ming loyalist ideology advocated by the Chosŏn court during the eighteenth century. The significance of their presence in Chosŏn, however, waned with the weakening of this ideology and the rise of Northern Learning in the nineteenth century. Under these adverse circumstances, the Ming loyalist families in the early nineteenth century employed various strategies to re-emphasize Ming loyalism and consolidate their Ming loyalist identity; an initiative they viewed as critical in justifying their presence in Chosŏn society. This article traces the variety of these identity-reinforcing efforts by the Ming loyalist families, ranging from shrine-building and compilation efforts to intermarriage. It focuses on the ritual structures built in Chojong’am by these descendants and analyzes how the symbols of Ming loyalism embedded in this place by the Chosŏn literati in the seventeenth century were manipulated by Ming descendants in the early nineteenth century. Through these initiatives, the descendants asserted a new version of Ming loyalism that not only potentially undermined the claims of the Chosŏn court/literati to be the inheritors of Ming culture but strengthened the symbolic significance of the Ming loyalist families. This study illuminates this implicit tension and disjuncture between the positions of the two parties, which is significant for understanding developments, rather than seeing the Ming loyalists’ activities as an outcome of ongoing cooperative interactions between the Chosŏn court and the Ming families nourished during the eighteenth century.
Abstract
The descendants of Ming loyalists who had migrated to Chosŏn with Prince Pongnim in 1645 were an integral part of the Ming loyalist ideology advocated by the Chosŏn court during the eighteenth century. The significance of their presence in Chosŏn, however, waned with the weakening of this ideology and the rise of Northern Learning in the nineteenth century. Under these adverse circumstances, the Ming loyalist families in the early nineteenth century employed various strategies to re-emphasize Ming loyalism and consolidate their Ming loyalist identity; an initiative they viewed as critical in justifying their presence in Chosŏn society. This article traces the variety of these identity-reinforcing efforts by the Ming loyalist families, ranging from shrine-building and compilation efforts to intermarriage. It focuses on the ritual structures built in Chojong’am by these descendants and analyzes how the symbols of Ming loyalism embedded in this place by the Chosŏn literati in the seventeenth century were manipulated by Ming descendants in the early nineteenth century. Through these initiatives, the descendants asserted a new version of Ming loyalism that not only potentially undermined the claims of the Chosŏn court/literati to be the inheritors of Ming culture but strengthened the symbolic significance of the Ming loyalist families. This study illuminates this implicit tension and disjuncture between the positions of the two parties, which is significant for understanding developments, rather than seeing the Ming loyalists’ activities as an outcome of ongoing cooperative interactions between the Chosŏn court and the Ming families nourished during the eighteenth century.
참고문헌 (64)
- (1985), Yŏgang ch’ulp’ansa
- [URL]
- "Hwangmyŏng yumin Chenam Wangssi taejongjunghoe", 1998
- Kim Yŏngnok, (1878), Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
- "Held at the Taet’ongmyo, Kap’yŏng County, Kyŏnggi Province", 1981
- (1818)[URL]
- P’ung Hakcho, (1828), Academy of Korean Studies
- (1834)[URL]
- P’ung Yŏngsŏp, (1973), Tongmunsa
- P’ung Yŏngsŏp, (1977), Chojong’am chaegŏnch’ujinhoe
- [URL]
- , Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
- Wang Tŏgil, (1822), Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
- Wang Tŏgil, (1873), Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
- Wang Tŏkku, (1818), Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
- Wang Tŏkku, (1888), Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
- ". Between 1835 and 1850"
- DON BAKER, "PRACTICAL ETHICS AND PRACTICAL LEARNING: TASAN’S APPROACH TO MORAL CULTIVATION", Acta Koreana, 13(2), pp.47~61 (2010), 한국학연구원[DOI]
- Bohnet, Adam, "Migrant and Border Subjects in Late Chosŏn Korea", Ph.D., pp.2008
- Bohnet, Adam, "Ruling Ideology and Marginal Subjects: Ming Loyalism and Foreign Lineages in Late Chosŏn Korea", Journal of Early Modern History, 15, pp.477~505 (2011)
- Adam Clarence Bohnet, "From Liaodongese Refugee to Ming Loyalist: The Historiography of the Sanggok Ma, a Ming Migrant Descent Group in Late Joseon Korea", The Review of Korean Studies, 15(1), pp.109~139 (2012), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- 조성산, "18세기 후반～19세기 전반 對淸認識의 변화와 새로운 中華 관념의 형성", 한국사연구, (145), pp.67~113 (2009), 한국사연구회
- "Hosŏ sahak", 1990, 135~176
- Chŏng Okcha, (1998), Ilchisa
- Duncan, John B., "Hyanghwain: Migration and Assimilation in Chosŏn Korea", Acta Koreana, 3, pp.99~113 (2000)
- Haboush, Jahyun Kim, "The Confucian Kingship in Korea: Yŏngjo and the Politics of Sagacity" (1988), Columbia University Press
- Haboush, Jahyun Kim, "Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea", pp.46~90 (1999), Harvard University Asia Center
- Haboush, Jahyun Kim, "Time, Temporality, and Imperial Transition", pp.115~141 (2005), University of Hawai‘i Press
- 한경구, "The Archaeology of the Ethnically Homogeneous Nation-State and Multiculturalism in Korea", Korea Journal, 47(4), pp.8~32 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- Han Myung-gi, "The East Asian War, 1592–1598: International Relations, Violence, and Memory", pp.277~293 (2015), Routledge
- 김호, "英祖의 大報壇 증수와 明 三皇의 享社", 한국문화, (32), pp.181~215 (2003), 규장각한국학연구원
- 김대식, "고종대 만동묘(萬東廟)와 서원(書院) 훼철 논의의 전개", 교육사상연구, 30(1), pp.47~72 (2016), 한국교육사상학회[DOI]
- 김두헌, "『姓源錄』을 통해서 본 서울 중인 가계 연구 - 중인 가계의 유형과 규모 및 정체성 -", 서울학연구, (39), pp.41~77 (2010), 서울학연구소
- Kye Sŭngbŏm, "The Posthumous Image and Role of Ming Taizu in Korean Politics", Ming Studies, 50, pp.107~130 (2004)
- Kye Sŭngbŏm, (2011), Sŏgang taehakkyo ch’ulp’anbu
- "Jinan xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexueban)", 2010, 228~233
- Mason, David A., "The Sam Hwangje Paehyang (Sacrificial Ceremony for Three Emperors): Korea’s Link to the Ming Dynasty", Korea Journal, 31(3), pp.117~136 (1991)
- 노혜경, "英祖代 皇朝人 대한 인식", 동양고전연구, (37), pp.127~159 (2009), 동양고전학회
- "Han’guk hakpo", 1994, 23~51
- "T’aedong kojŏn yŏn’gu", 1994, 61~99
- Pak Hŭibyŏng, (2013), Tolbegae
- Park, Eugene Y., "A Family of No Prominence: The Descendants of Pak Tŏkhwa and the Birth of Modern Korea" (2014), Stanford University Press
- Park Saeyoung, "Memory, Counternarrative, and the Body Politic in Post-Imjin War Chosŏn Korea", Journal of Korean Studies, 19(1), pp.153~178 (2014)
- 노영구, "Yi Sun-shin, an Admiral Who Became a Myth", The Review of Korean Studies, 7(3), pp.15~36 (2004), 한국학중앙연구원
- Roux Pierre Emmanuel, "THE CATHOLIC EXPERIENCE OF CHOSŎN ENVOYS IN BEIJING: A CONTACT ZONE AND THE CIRCULATION OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY", Acta Koreana, 19(1), pp.9~44 (2016), 한국학연구원[DOI]
- 석소영, "论朝鲜士林与朝宗岩思明文化的关系", 한중인문학연구, (41), pp.307~332 (2013), 한중인문학회
- Strassberg, Richard E., "Inscribed Landscapes: Travel Writings from Imperial China" (1994), University of California Press
- Sun Weiguo, (2007), Shangwu yinshuguan
- U Kyŏngsŏp, (2013), Yunisŭt’ori
- 우경섭, "조선후기 지식인들의 南明王朝 인식", 한국문화, (61), pp.133~155 (2013), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 우경섭, "조선후기 大明遺民의 罔僕之義 -濟南 王氏 가문의 사례-", 한국학연구, (36), pp.179~206 (2015), 한국학연구소
- Walraven, Boudewijn, "Religion and the City: Seoul in the Nineteenth Century", The Review of Korean Studies, 3(1), pp.178~206 (2000)
- 이남희, "조선 후기 醫科八世譜의 자료적 특성과 의미 — 현전 자료와 그 수록 년대를 중심으로 —", 조선시대사학보, (52), pp.231~262 (2010), 조선시대사학회
- 이욱, "조선후기 전쟁의 기억과 대보단(大報壇) 제향", 종교연구, (42), pp.127~163 (2006), 한국종교학회
- 이완우, "華陽洞과 尤庵事蹟", 藏書閣, (18), pp.89~162 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- Yu Ponghak, (1995), Ilchisa