서울대 규장각 소장, 토정-약현 세책 고소설 연구
A Study on the Tojeong-Yakhyeon sechaek(book rental) Old Novels Possessed by the Kyujanggak at Seoul National University
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article considered the characteristics and status of six types of sechaek (book rental) old novels including Gwakhaeryongjeon, Geumhyangjeonggi, Gimhongjeon, Jeongeulseonjeon, Hwachungseonsaengjeon, and Hanhuryongjeon possessed as sechaek by the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies at Seoul National University. Until now, several institutions have been confirmed to possess sechaek old novels; however, Dongyang Books, Gyeongbuk Provincial College, Ewha Womans University, and Kyujanggak possess several types of sechaek old novels that were owned by specific sechaek stores. From this, it is noteworthy that the size and operation of sechaek stores, characteristics of sechaek, readers of sechaek, and the relationship between sechaek texts can be identified. In particular, sechaek old novels possessed by the Kyujanggak, which will be dealt with in this article, are quite advanced among sechaeks that have been confirmed to date in terms of the period of transcription. Also, of these old sechaek novels, “Kimhongjeon” and “Hanhuryongjeon” only exist at the Kyujanggak; while sechaeks with the same titles of “Gwakhaeryongjeon”, “Geumhyangjeonggi”, “Jeongeulseonjeon”, and “Hwachungseonsaengjeon” exist in sechaek stores in regions other than Seoul. This is very important because it means that it is possible to confirm detailed facts about the relationship among sechaek stores and mutual issues of sechaek texts. In summarizing what was discovered in this article, the original scripts of the printed books of “Gwakhaeryongjeon” and “Geumhyangjeonggi” were re-confirmed to be sechaek. Meanwhile, the original scripts of the printed books of “Jeongeulseonjeon” and “Hanhuryongjeon” appeared to be sechaek; however, unlike “Gwakhaeryongjeon” and “Geumhyangjeonggi”, they did not use sechaek as a script as they are. *** This phenomenon might have been caused by partial modification of the contents by printed book dealers or for publication after bringing another sechaek to another region even from the beginning. Through the two works, another process of the publication of sechaek and a printed book could be confirmed. Also, from the example of “Kimhongjeon”, it was also possible to confirm the case of giving 세 by dividing the book appropriately while copying the gyeongpanbon during the creation of sechaek at sechaek stores. Among sechaek old novels possessed by the Kyujanggak, the greatest issue is “Hwachungseonsaengjeon”. It is impossible to know whether this work also was largely rewritten actually by sechaek providers. The cause for this needs diverse examinations. Furthermore, it is possible to confirm through this book that the original script of the printed book is not necessarily sechaek, but it was created through various routes. As such, the six types of sechaek old novels are important materials that show the importance of research into sechaek. The problems reviewed in this article need further examination to extend their meaning in more detail through a close comparison with sechaeks possessed by other institutes. Through follow-up research, these problems may be complemented further.
Abstract
This article considered the characteristics and status of six types of sechaek (book rental) old novels including Gwakhaeryongjeon, Geumhyangjeonggi, Gimhongjeon, Jeongeulseonjeon, Hwachungseonsaengjeon, and Hanhuryongjeon possessed as sechaek by the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies at Seoul National University. Until now, several institutions have been confirmed to possess sechaek old novels; however, Dongyang Books, Gyeongbuk Provincial College, Ewha Womans University, and Kyujanggak possess several types of sechaek old novels that were owned by specific sechaek stores. From this, it is noteworthy that the size and operation of sechaek stores, characteristics of sechaek, readers of sechaek, and the relationship between sechaek texts can be identified. In particular, sechaek old novels possessed by the Kyujanggak, which will be dealt with in this article, are quite advanced among sechaeks that have been confirmed to date in terms of the period of transcription. Also, of these old sechaek novels, “Kimhongjeon” and “Hanhuryongjeon” only exist at the Kyujanggak; while sechaeks with the same titles of “Gwakhaeryongjeon”, “Geumhyangjeonggi”, “Jeongeulseonjeon”, and “Hwachungseonsaengjeon” exist in sechaek stores in regions other than Seoul. This is very important because it means that it is possible to confirm detailed facts about the relationship among sechaek stores and mutual issues of sechaek texts. In summarizing what was discovered in this article, the original scripts of the printed books of “Gwakhaeryongjeon” and “Geumhyangjeonggi” were re-confirmed to be sechaek. Meanwhile, the original scripts of the printed books of “Jeongeulseonjeon” and “Hanhuryongjeon” appeared to be sechaek; however, unlike “Gwakhaeryongjeon” and “Geumhyangjeonggi”, they did not use sechaek as a script as they are. *** This phenomenon might have been caused by partial modification of the contents by printed book dealers or for publication after bringing another sechaek to another region even from the beginning. Through the two works, another process of the publication of sechaek and a printed book could be confirmed. Also, from the example of “Kimhongjeon”, it was also possible to confirm the case of giving 세 by dividing the book appropriately while copying the gyeongpanbon during the creation of sechaek at sechaek stores. Among sechaek old novels possessed by the Kyujanggak, the greatest issue is “Hwachungseonsaengjeon”. It is impossible to know whether this work also was largely rewritten actually by sechaek providers. The cause for this needs diverse examinations. Furthermore, it is possible to confirm through this book that the original script of the printed book is not necessarily sechaek, but it was created through various routes. As such, the six types of sechaek old novels are important materials that show the importance of research into sechaek. The problems reviewed in this article need further examination to extend their meaning in more detail through a close comparison with sechaeks possessed by other institutes. Through follow-up research, these problems may be complemented further.
참고문헌 (23)
- 최완기, "조선시대 서울의 경제생활" (1994), 서울학연구소
- 고동환, "조선 후기 서울 상업 발달사" (1998), 지식산업사
- 김은자, "古小說을 통해본 19세기 私宴의 公演文化 樣相-<화충선생전>을 중심으로-", 반교어문연구, 20(20), pp.103~129 (2006), 반교어문학회
- 최진형, "세책본 고소설의 개작 양상 -<화충선생전>을 중심으로-", 반교어문연구, (30), pp.121~148 (2011), 반교어문학회
- 유춘동, "「금향정기」의 연원과 이본 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2002
- 정병설, "빌린 소설에 그린 낙서", 문헌과 해석, 29 (2004), 문헌과 해석사
- 정병설, "조선의 음담패설" (2010), 예옥
- 정병설, "도서원부를 통해 본 경성제국대학 도서관의 한국고서 수집", 문헌과 해석, 63, pp.129~133 (2013)
- 안춘근, "한국 세책업 변천고", 서지학, 6, pp.75~ (1973), 한국서지학회
- 조희웅, "고전소설 연구보정", pp.48~49 (2006), 박이정
- 권유은, "<곽해룡전>의 구조와 의미", 석사, 고전문학(국어국문학), pp.2004
- 이윤석, "구활자본 야담의 변이양상 연구", pp.149~156 (2001), 보고사
- 이윤석, "금향정기" (2007), 경인문화사
- 이주영, "구활자본 고전소설 연구", pp.209~ (1998), 월인
- 권혜란, "고전소설 『김홍전』 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2011
- 김동욱, "영인 고소설 판각본 전집 4", pp.123~152 (1975), 나손서옥
- 모리스쿠랑, "한국서지" (1994), 일조각
- 임성래, "조선후기의 대중소설" (2008), 보고사
- 김경숙, "정을선전 연구", 열상고전연구, 12 (1999), 열상고전연구회
- 조동일, "한국문학통사", pp.491~ (1994), 지식산업사
- 최진형, "장끼전의 작품 세계" (2013), 보고사
- 전성운, "조선후기 장편 국문소설의 전망" (2002), 보고사
- 김미리, "<한후룡전> 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2001
