고려의 건국과 고구려계승의식 -‘弓裔의 高麗’에 대한 인식을 중심으로-
Goryeo’s foundation, and its Consciousness of succeeding Goguryeo(高句麗繼承意識): Examination of the ‘Gung Ye(弓裔)’s Goryeo(高麗)’ Notion
0
조회
0
다운로드
25
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Examined in this article is the Goryeo people’s consciousness of succeeding Goguryeo. It had a dual aspect to it, as such consciousness contained two separate notions: the sentiment of inheriting Gung Ye(弓裔)’s Goryeo, and the sentiment of breaking free from that. ‘Goryeo(高麗),’ the title of the dynasty was actually a reenactment of Gung Ye’s first choice for his own dynasty(which was later renamed to Taebong(泰封)), and the newborn Goryeo dynasty’s policies including the restoration of the Pyeongyang(平壤) city were all based upon philosophies that had been demonstrated by Gung Ye himself. Gung Ye was actually considered as the ‘Former Lord(前主),’ who, compared to the dynasty founder Wang Geon(王建), laid out the basis for the newborn dynasty. But there was an exactly opposite kind of sentiment as well, as it also was a historical fact that Wang Geon subverted Gung Ye because of all his unjustified use of force and brutality. Naturally there was a stance exhibited by the Goryeo people that tried to set oneself apart from Gung Ye’s legacy. At first, Gung Ye’s Goryeo was considered as the ‘Later Goryeo(後高麗),’ as opposed to Goguryeo(高句麗) which was considered as ‘Former Goreyo(前高麗),’ but the Goryeo government made it its own official stance to consider all the things that came before Wang Geon’s enthronement as part of Former Goryeo’s history, including the days of Gung Ye. This kind of dual perception of the Gung Ye period was reflected in the Chinese historical texts as well, as while they were recording the discontinuation of the Go House line(“高氏”), they also wrote that the line of Go was restored before the time of Wang Geon’s enthronement. Such documentation could also be construed as an act of intention to erase ‘Gung Ye’s Goryeo,’ and directly connect Goguryeo and Goryeo.
Abstract
Examined in this article is the Goryeo people’s consciousness of succeeding Goguryeo. It had a dual aspect to it, as such consciousness contained two separate notions: the sentiment of inheriting Gung Ye(弓裔)’s Goryeo, and the sentiment of breaking free from that. ‘Goryeo(高麗),’ the title of the dynasty was actually a reenactment of Gung Ye’s first choice for his own dynasty(which was later renamed to Taebong(泰封)), and the newborn Goryeo dynasty’s policies including the restoration of the Pyeongyang(平壤) city were all based upon philosophies that had been demonstrated by Gung Ye himself. Gung Ye was actually considered as the ‘Former Lord(前主),’ who, compared to the dynasty founder Wang Geon(王建), laid out the basis for the newborn dynasty. But there was an exactly opposite kind of sentiment as well, as it also was a historical fact that Wang Geon subverted Gung Ye because of all his unjustified use of force and brutality. Naturally there was a stance exhibited by the Goryeo people that tried to set oneself apart from Gung Ye’s legacy. At first, Gung Ye’s Goryeo was considered as the ‘Later Goryeo(後高麗),’ as opposed to Goguryeo(高句麗) which was considered as ‘Former Goreyo(前高麗),’ but the Goryeo government made it its own official stance to consider all the things that came before Wang Geon’s enthronement as part of Former Goryeo’s history, including the days of Gung Ye. This kind of dual perception of the Gung Ye period was reflected in the Chinese historical texts as well, as while they were recording the discontinuation of the Go House line(“高氏”), they also wrote that the line of Go was restored before the time of Wang Geon’s enthronement. Such documentation could also be construed as an act of intention to erase ‘Gung Ye’s Goryeo,’ and directly connect Goguryeo and Goryeo.
참고문헌 (37)
- 朴漢卨, "高麗 王室의 起源: 高麗의 高句麗繼承理念과 關聯하여", 史叢, 21․22 (1977)
- 朴禮在, "高麗太祖 王建의 高句麗 復古意識", 공군사관학교논문집, 7 (1977)
- 金光洙, "高麗朝의 高句麗繼承意識과 古朝鮮認識", 歷史敎育, 43 (1988)
- 鄭求福, "高句麗의 ‘高麗’ 國號에 대한 一考: 三國史記의 기록과 관련하여", 湖西史學, 19․20 (1992)
- 高句麗硏究會, "徐熙와 高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識" (1999), 學硏文化社
- 안병우, "고구려와 고려의 역사적 계승 관계", 한국고대사연구, 33, pp.117~140 (2004), 한국고대사학회
- 朴漢卨, "高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識", 高句麗硏究, 18 (2004)
- 崔圭成, "중국의 東北工程의 실체와 高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識", 白山學報, 70 (2004)
- 박용운, "국호 高句麗·高麗에 대한 일고찰", 北方史論叢, 1 (2004)
- 박용운, "고려시기 사람들의 高麗의 高句麗繼承意識", 北方史論叢, 2 (2004)
- 박용운, "高麗의 高句麗繼承에 대한 東北亞사람들의 이해", 北方史論叢, 9 (2006)
- 박용운, "고려의 고구려계승에 대한 종합적 검토" (2006), 일지사
- 이재범, "궁예. 왕건정권의 역사적 연속성에 관한 고찰", 사림, (24), pp.101~128 (2005), 수선사학회
- 이재범, "고려 건국기 사회동향 연구" (2010), 경인문화사
- 李在範, "박성수교수화갑기념논총" (1991)
- 李在範, "後三國時代 弓裔政權 硏究" (2007), 혜안
- 최규성, "고려 태조 왕건 연구" (2005), 주류성
- 조인성, "弓裔의 後高句麗 건국과 관련한 두 문제", 신라문화, (27), pp.133~150 (2006), 신라문화연구소
- "高麗史", ~
- "三峯集 권7", ~
- "三國史記", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "東國李相國集 前集 권40", ~
- "新增東國輿地勝覽 권51", ~
- 김창현, "고려시대 평양의 동명 숭배와 민간신앙", 역사학보, (188), pp.103~135 (2005), 역사학회
- 김철웅, "고려시대 서경의 聖容殿", 문화사학, (31), pp.109~128 (2009), 한국문화사학회
- "大覺國師文集", ~
- "湖山錄 권4", ~
- 許興植, "眞靜國師와 湖山錄", pp.274~ (1995), 民族社
- 최연식, "<<健拏標訶一乘修行者秘密義記>>와 羅末麗初 華嚴學의 一動向", 한국사연구, (126), pp.37~81 (2004), 한국사연구회
- 강경구, "新羅의 浿西 地方과 前高麗 王朝", 白山學報, 72 (2006)
- "宋高僧傳", ~
- "高麗圖經", ~
- "舊五代史 권138", ~
- "新五代史 권74", ~
- "宋史 권487", ~
- "資治通鑑", ~
