고려 예종대 西京 龍堰宮 경영과 역사계승의식
Construction of the Yong’eon-gung(龍堰宮) Palace at the Seo’gyeong(西京) Capital during the Reign of Goryeo King Yejong, and the Society’s Perception of History
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Examined in this article is the Yong’eon-gung(龍堰宮) palace construction which took place in the 11th year of King Yejong’s reign at the Seogyeong capital, as it was an event that could show us what kind of historical perspective the Goryeo people had throughout the middle period of the dynasty. As the Seogyeong capital (the “Western Capital”) was generally considered by the Goryeo people as a place where founder Dongmyeong-wang(東明王) of Goguryeo established his own capital, the Goryeo kings’ constructions of palace in Seogyeong as well as royal visits there were recognized as vivid displays of the Goryeo people’s own Historical sense that they succeeded the old Goguryeo dynasty(高句麗繼承意識). The case of the Yong’eon-gung palace is particularly worth noting, as the King Yejong’s 11th year on the throne, which was the Byeonghsin-year[丙申年], harbored additional symbolism. It was no other than the 180th year since the unification of the Later Three dynasties, making the palace as one built on the very same year the three dynasties were reunited by Goryeo. The choice of year would have further established Goryeo in the eyes of its own people as the embodiment of the Notion of Three Han units being one(三韓一統意識). The discussion to build the Yong’eon-gung palace at Seogyeong went on in the early years of Yejong’s reign, and was in fact a contradicting one to Yejong’s own father Sukjong’s earlier effort to build the Southern Capital(Namgyeong, 南京). The whole discussion was actually related to the plans to establish the Nine Fortresses in the Northeast perimeters of Goryeo, which had been a project conceived in the spirit of reclaiming the ancient territory of Goguryeo. Yet the project unfortunately ended in failure, and the construction of the Yong’eon-gung palace was also put on hold. Later, when the Jurchen Chin(金) attacked the Khitans, the Liao dynasty destabilized and Goryeo again resumed planning to retrieve the Liaodung region, which was part of the late Goguryeo territory. Yejong ordered the construction of Yong’eon-gung to resume, and after it was completed he went there and declared a set of New Orders(Shin’gyo, 新敎), officially announcing literally a ‘new beginning’ for the dynasty. The governmental structure was even revised to support the king’s new agenda. Yet such ambitious agenda was again blocked, when Goryeo decided to establish a Tributary/Appointment relationship with the newborn Chin dynasty.
Abstract
Examined in this article is the Yong’eon-gung(龍堰宮) palace construction which took place in the 11th year of King Yejong’s reign at the Seogyeong capital, as it was an event that could show us what kind of historical perspective the Goryeo people had throughout the middle period of the dynasty. As the Seogyeong capital (the “Western Capital”) was generally considered by the Goryeo people as a place where founder Dongmyeong-wang(東明王) of Goguryeo established his own capital, the Goryeo kings’ constructions of palace in Seogyeong as well as royal visits there were recognized as vivid displays of the Goryeo people’s own Historical sense that they succeeded the old Goguryeo dynasty(高句麗繼承意識). The case of the Yong’eon-gung palace is particularly worth noting, as the King Yejong’s 11th year on the throne, which was the Byeonghsin-year[丙申年], harbored additional symbolism. It was no other than the 180th year since the unification of the Later Three dynasties, making the palace as one built on the very same year the three dynasties were reunited by Goryeo. The choice of year would have further established Goryeo in the eyes of its own people as the embodiment of the Notion of Three Han units being one(三韓一統意識). The discussion to build the Yong’eon-gung palace at Seogyeong went on in the early years of Yejong’s reign, and was in fact a contradicting one to Yejong’s own father Sukjong’s earlier effort to build the Southern Capital(Namgyeong, 南京). The whole discussion was actually related to the plans to establish the Nine Fortresses in the Northeast perimeters of Goryeo, which had been a project conceived in the spirit of reclaiming the ancient territory of Goguryeo. Yet the project unfortunately ended in failure, and the construction of the Yong’eon-gung palace was also put on hold. Later, when the Jurchen Chin(金) attacked the Khitans, the Liao dynasty destabilized and Goryeo again resumed planning to retrieve the Liaodung region, which was part of the late Goguryeo territory. Yejong ordered the construction of Yong’eon-gung to resume, and after it was completed he went there and declared a set of New Orders(Shin’gyo, 新敎), officially announcing literally a ‘new beginning’ for the dynasty. The governmental structure was even revised to support the king’s new agenda. Yet such ambitious agenda was again blocked, when Goryeo decided to establish a Tributary/Appointment relationship with the newborn Chin dynasty.
참고문헌 (34)
- "三國史記", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "東文選", ~
- "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
- "金史", ~
- 노명호, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究" (2000), 서울大學校出版部
- 구산우, "고려시기 제도와 정책의 수용과 배제-成宗代 華風과 土風의 공존과 갈등을 중심으로-", 한국중세사연구, (42), pp.99~135 (2015), 한국중세사학회
- 김병인, "高麗 睿宗代 道敎 振興의 배경과 추진세력", 역사학연구, 20, pp.1~21 (2003), 호남사학회
- 김병인, "高麗 睿宗代 政治勢力 硏究" (2003), 경인문화사
- 김성규, "여‧금의 국교 수립과 ‘誓表’ 문제", 한국사연구, (173), pp.127~160 (2016), 한국사연구회
- 김순자, "12세기 고려와 여진·금(金)의 영토 분쟁과 대응", 역사와 현실, (83), pp.139~174 (2012), 한국역사연구회
- 김창현, "고려중기 예종・인종의 통치와 관료집단의 성격", 한국인물사연구, (8), pp.107~167 (2007), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 金澈雄, "高麗中期 道敎의 盛行과 그 性格", 史學志, 28 (1995)
- 박윤미, "12세기 전반기의 국제정세와 고려-금 관계 정립", 사학연구, (104), pp.1~35 (2011), 한국사학회
- 박윤미, "고려의 保州 수복과 고려‧금 간 외교교섭", 한국중세사연구, (51), pp.173~203 (2017), 한국중세사학회
- 박종기, "예종대 정치개혁과 정치세력의 변동", 역사와현실, 9 (1993)
- 朴漢男, "고려 인종대 對金政策의 성격 : 保州讓與와 投入戶口推刷문제를 중심으로", 한국중세사연구, 3 (1996)
- 宋春永, "高麗時代의 西京學校", 大丘史學, 28 (1985)
- 윤경진, "고려의 건국과 고구려계승의식 -‘弓裔의 高麗’에 대한 인식을 중심으로-", 한국문화, (68), pp.143~179 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 윤경진, "고려의 三韓一統意識과 ‘開國’ 인식", 한국문화, (74), pp.335~375 (2016), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 윤경진, "고려 성종대 歷史繼承意識의 전개 양상", 한국문화, (77), pp.115~147 (2017), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 윤경진, "고려 예종대 동북 9성 환부의 경위와 배경", 진단학보, (128), pp.1~28 (2017), 진단학회
- 윤경진, "고려의 對後唐 외교와 신라 — ‘尊王論’의 전개와 관련하여 —", 사림, (66), pp.57~99 (2018), 수선사학회[DOI]
- 윤경진, "고려의 동북 9성 개척에 대한 몇 가지 고찰", 군사, (114), pp.123~157 (2020), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 윤경진, "고려 숙종대 南京 설치와 역사계승의식", 서울과 역사, (105), pp.7~50 (2020), 서울역사편찬원[DOI]
- 윤경진, "고려중기 고구려계승의식의 변화와 ‘句高麗’", 역사와 실학, (72), pp.71~111 (2020), 역사실학회
- 윤경진, "고구려·고려의 영토의식과 한강 - 고구려의 한강이남 영유 문제에 대한 새로운 접근 -", 서울학연구, (81), pp.73~106 (2020), 서울학연구소[DOI]
- 李丙燾, "高麗時代의 硏究 : 특히 圖讖思想의 發展을 중심으로" (1980), 亞細亞文化社
- 이정신, "고려시대의 정치변동과 대외정책" (2004), 경인문화사
- 이정훈, "고려시대 금과의 대외관계와 同文院", 사학연구, (119), pp.201~240 (2015), 한국사학회
- 이진한, "고려시대 본품항두(本品行頭)", 역사와 현실, (54), pp.253~286 (2004), 한국역사연구회
- 채웅석, "전쟁과 동북아의 국제질서" (2006), 一潮閣
- 채웅석, "고려 예종대 道家思想·道敎 흥기의 정치적 성격", 한국사연구, (142), pp.105~141 (2008), 한국사연구회
