고려의 三韓一統意識과 ‘開國’ 인식
Goryeo’s notion of “Three Hans becoming One(三韓一統意識),” and its perception of the “Foundation of the Country(‘開國’)”
1
조회
0
다운로드
33
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Examined in this study is a historical fact that the term “Foundation of the Country(開國),” during the Goryeo period, actually referred to the unification of the Later three dynasties(後三國), instead of Founder king Taejo(太祖) Wang-Geon(王建)’s enthronement. Goryeo proclaimed that it was a successor dynasty to Goguryeo, and endeavored to unite the later three dynasties. Its operation system and institutions were based upon the very notion that three Hans had been one all the time. Vassals who helped Wang Geon and contributed to his enthronement were never called as “Meritorious vassals for the foundation of the country(開國功臣),” but were instead included in the “Three Hans’ Meritorious vassals(三韓功臣),” which referred to vassals who contributed to the unification of the later three dynasties. It was the same with the term “Foundation of the Country(開國),” which we can find from many Goryeo records, as they also referred to the unification of the country, instead of the founder king’s rise to the throne. Goryeo also perceived the beginning point of the dynasty as the year of its unification. In the ending days of Goryeo, a new view considering the starting point of the dynasty to have been Wang Geon’s year of enthronement slowly began to prevail, yet during the better part of the entire Goryeo period, unification of the peninsula was continuously considered as a much more important and definitive marker. Founder king Taejo was also defined as “The King who reunited(一統) the Three Hans(三韓).”
Abstract
Examined in this study is a historical fact that the term “Foundation of the Country(開國),” during the Goryeo period, actually referred to the unification of the Later three dynasties(後三國), instead of Founder king Taejo(太祖) Wang-Geon(王建)’s enthronement. Goryeo proclaimed that it was a successor dynasty to Goguryeo, and endeavored to unite the later three dynasties. Its operation system and institutions were based upon the very notion that three Hans had been one all the time. Vassals who helped Wang Geon and contributed to his enthronement were never called as “Meritorious vassals for the foundation of the country(開國功臣),” but were instead included in the “Three Hans’ Meritorious vassals(三韓功臣),” which referred to vassals who contributed to the unification of the later three dynasties. It was the same with the term “Foundation of the Country(開國),” which we can find from many Goryeo records, as they also referred to the unification of the country, instead of the founder king’s rise to the throne. Goryeo also perceived the beginning point of the dynasty as the year of its unification. In the ending days of Goryeo, a new view considering the starting point of the dynasty to have been Wang Geon’s year of enthronement slowly began to prevail, yet during the better part of the entire Goryeo period, unification of the peninsula was continuously considered as a much more important and definitive marker. Founder king Taejo was also defined as “The King who reunited(一統) the Three Hans(三韓).”
참고문헌 (42)
- 朴漢卨, "高麗 王室의 起源: 高麗의 高句麗繼承理念과 關聯하여", 史叢, 21․22 (1977)
- 朴禮在, "高麗太祖 王建의 高句麗 復古意識", 공군사관학교논문집, 7 (1977)
- 金光洙, "高麗朝의 高句麗繼承意識과 古朝鮮認識", 歷史敎育, 43 (1988)
- 高句麗硏究會, "徐熙와 高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識" (1999), 學硏文化社
- 안병우, "고구려와 고려의 역사적 계승 관계", 한국고대사연구, 33, pp.117~140 (2004), 한국고대사학회
- 이성제, "北韓의 高句麗史 硏究와 歷史意識", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.227~248 (2004), 고구려발해학회
- 崔圭成, "중국의 東北工程의 실체와 高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識", 白山學報, 70 (2004)
- 박용운, "고려의 고구려계승에 대한 종합적 검토" (2006), 일지사
- 河炫綱, "高麗時代의 歷史繼承意識", 梨花史學硏究, 8 (1975)
- 趙仁成, "李基白古稀紀念論叢" (1994), 一潮閣
- 윤경진, "고려의 건국과 고구려계승의식 -‘弓裔의 高麗’에 대한 인식을 중심으로-", 한국문화, (68), pp.143~179 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원
- 高柄翊, "金載元回甲紀念論叢" (1969)
- 金光洙, "高麗史의 諸問題" (1986), 三英社
- 김갑동, "고려의 건국 및 후삼국통일의 민족사적 의미", 한국사연구, (143), pp.111~143 (2008), 한국사연구회
- 2009, , ~
- 김상현, "一然의 一統三韓 認識", 신라문화, 38, pp.223~250 (2011), 신라문화연구소
- 김수태, "일연의 삼한·삼국통일론", 서강인문논총, (43), pp.155~192 (2015), 인문과학연구소
- 金漢奎, "李基白古稀紀念論叢" (1994), 一潮閣
- 李成珪, "동북아시아 선사 및 고대사 연구의 방향" (2004), 학연문화사
- 윤경진, "三韓 인식의 연원과 통일전쟁기 新羅의 天下觀", 동방학지, (167), pp.95~131 (2014), 국학연구원
- 김창현, "고려초기 정국과 서경", 사학연구, (80) (2005), 한국사학회
- "高麗史", ~
- 윤경진, "고려시대 西京畿의 형성과 재편 - 『고려사』 지리지 연혁의 補正을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (148), pp.95~140 (2009), 국학연구원
- 김갑동, "고려의 후삼국 통일", 한신인문학연구, 1, pp.34~ (2000)
- 윤경진, "｢청주운천동사적비｣의 건립 시기에 대한 재검토", 사림, (45), pp.107~140 (2013), 수선사학회
- 曺凡煥, "李基白古稀紀念論叢(上)" (1994), 論叢刊行委員會
- 김갑동, "신라의 멸망과 경주세력의 동향", 新羅文化, 10․11 (1994)
- 음선혁, "新羅 敬順王의 卽位와 高麗 歸附의 政治的 性格", 全南史學, 11 (1997)
- 황선영, "敬順王의 歸附와 高麗初期 新羅系勢力의 基盤", 한국중세사연구, 14, pp.55~90 (2003), 한국중세사학회
- "世祖實錄", ~
- 金光洙, "高麗太祖의 三韓功臣", 史學志, 7 (1973)
- 周藤吉之, "高麗初期の功臣特に三韓功臣の創設: 唐末․五代․宋初の功臣との關連において", 東洋學報, 66(1-4) (1985)
- 윤정, "조선 중종 전반기 정국구도와 정책론", 역사와현실, 25 (1997)
- 朴天植, "高麗 配享功臣의 制度的 性格과 그 特性", 全羅文化論叢, 3 (1989)
- 김보광, "고려 성종․현종대 太祖配享功臣의 선정 과정과 의미", 사학연구, (113), pp.43~82 (2014), 한국사학회
- "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
- 金基雄, "高麗初期의 新羅系勢力과 그 動向", 釜大史學, 17, pp.148~150 (1993)
- 李賢淑, "나말여초 崔彦撝의 정치적 활동과 위상", 梨花史學硏究, 22 (1995)
- 具山祐, "고려초기 향촌지배층의 사회적 동향: 금석문 분석을 통한 접근", 釜山史學, 39, pp.93~ (2000)
- 尹京鎭, "高麗初期 在地官班의 정치적 위상과 지방사회 운영", 한국사연구, (116), pp.4~130 (2002), 한국사연구회
- 尹京鎭, "나말려초 성주의 존재양태와 고려의 대성주정책", 역사와현실, 40 (2001)
- 노명호, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究(上)" (2000), 尙書都官貼