본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

栗谷 李珥의 『東湖問答』과 君臣論

Yi Yi’s Dongho mundap and Theory of Monarch and Subjects

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The Dongho mundap (東湖問答, Catechism at Eastern Lake) presented by Yi Yi in September of the 2nd year of King Seonjo’s reign is a work that served as a blueprint for his reforms. Previous studies of the Dongho mundap have been limited by their overarching focus on the interpretation of the texts and annotations found throughout the entire work. However, this study concludes that the core assertions of the work can be found in the first half of Dongho mundap. This study also departs from existing studies in that the interpretation of Yi Yi’s assertions is based on the prevailing historical and political contexts. In the first half of his work, Yi Yi reviewed the relationship between monarch and subjects throughout the history of China and Joseon, and sought to express the political ‘goal’ that Joseon should pursue and the essential ‘method’ which should be used to achieve the goals. First, the ‘goal’ was the ‘recovery of the governance of three generations (三代之治)’ to counter what Yi saw as being made necessary by the meritorious subjects’ lack of the sincere belief and practical will that he and the members of the reform group possessed. This was a strong criticism of the meritorious subjects blocking the reforms of the time. Next, the ‘method’ involved a power structure based on ‘mutual contentment between monarch and subjects (君臣相得)’. Yi Yi regarded that the reform group should grasp the power to recover the governance of three generations. This already contained the cause of internal conflicts within the reform group, which were exposed with the reform group was spilt into the Eastern and Western parties in the future. Both parties agreed on the ‘goal’ while exhibiting different opinions on the ‘method’.

Abstract

The Dongho mundap (東湖問答, Catechism at Eastern Lake) presented by Yi Yi in September of the 2nd year of King Seonjo’s reign is a work that served as a blueprint for his reforms. Previous studies of the Dongho mundap have been limited by their overarching focus on the interpretation of the texts and annotations found throughout the entire work. However, this study concludes that the core assertions of the work can be found in the first half of Dongho mundap. This study also departs from existing studies in that the interpretation of Yi Yi’s assertions is based on the prevailing historical and political contexts. In the first half of his work, Yi Yi reviewed the relationship between monarch and subjects throughout the history of China and Joseon, and sought to express the political ‘goal’ that Joseon should pursue and the essential ‘method’ which should be used to achieve the goals. First, the ‘goal’ was the ‘recovery of the governance of three generations (三代之治)’ to counter what Yi saw as being made necessary by the meritorious subjects’ lack of the sincere belief and practical will that he and the members of the reform group possessed. This was a strong criticism of the meritorious subjects blocking the reforms of the time. Next, the ‘method’ involved a power structure based on ‘mutual contentment between monarch and subjects (君臣相得)’. Yi Yi regarded that the reform group should grasp the power to recover the governance of three generations. This already contained the cause of internal conflicts within the reform group, which were exposed with the reform group was spilt into the Eastern and Western parties in the future. Both parties agreed on the ‘goal’ while exhibiting different opinions on the ‘method’.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. 최승순, "栗谷의 東湖問答考", 율곡사상연구, 1 (1997)
  2. 안외순, "『東湖問答』에 나타난 율곡 이이의 초기 정치사상: 도덕주의와 현실주의의 통일", 유교사상문화연구, 28 (2007)
  3. 안외순, "동호문답" (2005), 책세상
  4. 정재훈, "동호문답: 조선의 군주론, 왕도정치를 말하다" (2014), 아카넷
  5. 이태진, "조선시대 정치사의 재조명", pp.57~ (2003), 태학사
  6. 이태진, "朝鮮後期의 政治와 軍營制變遷" (1985), 한국연구원
  7. 김항수, "宣祖 初年의 新舊갈등과 政局動向", 국사관논총, 34 (1992)
  8. 지두환, "조선전기 의례연구" (1994), 서울대학교출판부
  9. 고영진, "조선중기 예학사상사" (1996), 한길사
  10. 이태진, "조선왕조의 유교정치와 왕권", 한국사론, 23 (1990), 서울대 국사학과
  11. 홍순민, "(한국역사연구회시대사총서) 조선시대사 1: 국가와 세계" (2016), 푸른역사
  12. 김정신, "조선전기 훈구·사림의 정치사상 비교", 박사, 사학, pp.2008
  13. "은봉전서", ~
  14. "백사집", ~
  15. "중봉집", ~
  16. "율곡전서", ~
  17. "성학집요", ~
  18. "동호문답", ~
  19. 김경래, "선조대 초반의 정국과 율곡 이이의 개혁론", 박사, pp.2015
  20. "선조실록", ~
  21. "선조수정실록", ~
  22. 김정신, "宣祖代 文昭殿 論爭과 朋黨", 한국사상사학, (22), pp.115~166 (2004), 한국사상사학회
  23. 호이트 틸만, "주희의 사유세계: 주자학의 패권", pp.14~20 (2010), 교육과학사
  24. "고봉집", ~
  25. "宋史", ~
  26. 고지마 쓰요시, "송학의 형성과 전개", pp.190~191 (2004), 논형
  27. 손영식, "이성과 현실" (1999), 울산대학교출판부
  28. 이용주, "주희의 문화 이데올로기" (2003), 이학사
  29. 조남호, "주희: 중국철학의 중심" (2004), 태학사
  30. Hoyt Cleverland Tillman, "Utilitarian Confucianism" (1982), Harvard University Press
  31. "삼봉집", ~
  32. 한영우, "정도전사상의 연구", pp.177~178 (1999), 서울대학교출판부
  33. 도현철, "목은 이색의 정치사상 연구", pp.234~238 (2011), 혜안
  34. 강문식, "권근의 경학사상 연구", pp.277~279 (2008), 일지사
  35. "세조실록", ~
  36. "정암집", ~
  37. "논어", ~
  38. "맹자", ~
  39. "논어집주", ~
  40. 김훈식, "16세기 군신윤리의 변화와 출처론", 역사와 현실, 50 (2003)
  41. 김인호, "여말선초 군주수신론과 『大學衍義』", 역사와 현실, 29 (1998)
  42. 지두환, "조선전기 君子·小人 논의: 『大學衍義』 왕안석론을 중심으로", 태동고전연구, 9 (1993)
  43. 지두환, "조선 전기 『大學衍義』 이해과정", 태동고전연구, 10 (1993)
  44. 정재훈, "조선전기 『대학』 이해와 聖學論", 진단학보, 86 (1998)
  45. 2010, , 216~224
  46. "태조실록", ~
  47. 윤정, "朝鮮 中宗․英祖代 『大學衍義補』 進講의 의미", 규장각, 21 (2001)
  48. "퇴계전서", ~
  49. "정관정요", ~
  50. 위잉스, "주희의 역사세계 하" (2015), 글항아리
  51. 王瑞來, "宋代の皇帝権力と士大夫政治" (2001), 汲古書院
  52. 도현철, "정도전의 정치체제 구상과 재상정치론", 한국사학보, 9 (2000)
  53. "삼봉집", ~
  54. 한영우, "정도전사상의 연구", pp.137~147 (1983), 서울대학교출판부
  55. 김영두, "宣祖初 文廟從祀 論議와 道統論의 變化", 한국사상사학, (31), pp.329~364 (2008), 한국사상사학회
  56. "중종실록", ~
  57. 민현구, "조선초기의 사병", 東洋學, 14 (1984)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)