漢譯本 『士民必知』의 飜譯 樣相에 대한 연구
A Study about the Chinese Translation Aspects of “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)”
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“SaMinpilJi(士民必知)” is the earliest world geography textbook in Korean Language. It introduced various natural phenomena on the earth and the location, climate, population, language, culture and etc. of the major countries in the world. This book was written by Homer Bezaleel Hulbert who supplied as an American missionary in Korea during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1895, Kim Taeg-young(金澤榮), Bae nam-kyu(白南圭) and Lee Myung-sang(李明翔) translated the book into Chinese. In this paper we tried to find out the reason why “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)” was translated from Korean into Chinese. Especially, in the late 19th century most of the educated people in Korean began to use pure Hangul instead of Korean mixed script since they recognized the value of the pure Hangul. We considered that Kim Taeg-young(金澤榮), one of the most famous Chinese scholars at that time, played an important role in the Chinese tranlation of “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)”. We also examined the translation aspects of “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)” by comparing the original text with the Chinese translation, and we found out the following important features. First, in the original text every country was described in the same order while in the Chinese translation it was changed a lot. Only the important information was located in the front of every text and relatively less important one had a back position, or even deleted in the Chinese translation. We called this kind of translation ‘balchueyeok(拔萃譯)’ where the important parts were translated only. Second, new contents about the history of every country were added in the Chinese translation. Note that the added contents were mainly connected with the history of China.
Abstract
“SaMinpilJi(士民必知)” is the earliest world geography textbook in Korean Language. It introduced various natural phenomena on the earth and the location, climate, population, language, culture and etc. of the major countries in the world. This book was written by Homer Bezaleel Hulbert who supplied as an American missionary in Korea during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1895, Kim Taeg-young(金澤榮), Bae nam-kyu(白南圭) and Lee Myung-sang(李明翔) translated the book into Chinese. In this paper we tried to find out the reason why “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)” was translated from Korean into Chinese. Especially, in the late 19th century most of the educated people in Korean began to use pure Hangul instead of Korean mixed script since they recognized the value of the pure Hangul. We considered that Kim Taeg-young(金澤榮), one of the most famous Chinese scholars at that time, played an important role in the Chinese tranlation of “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)”. We also examined the translation aspects of “SaMinpilJi(士民必知)” by comparing the original text with the Chinese translation, and we found out the following important features. First, in the original text every country was described in the same order while in the Chinese translation it was changed a lot. Only the important information was located in the front of every text and relatively less important one had a back position, or even deleted in the Chinese translation. We called this kind of translation ‘balchueyeok(拔萃譯)’ where the important parts were translated only. Second, new contents about the history of every country were added in the Chinese translation. Note that the added contents were mainly connected with the history of China.
참고문헌 (18)
- "민필지 (奎7695)", 규장각한국학연구원 소장본, ~
- "士民必知 (한古朝60-1)", 국립중앙도서관 소장본, ~
- 고영근, "개화기의 한국 어문 운동: 국한문혼용론과 한글전용론을 중심으로", 冠嶽語文硏究, 25 (2000)
- 김동훈, "김택영, 근대적 각성과 중국문인들의 영향", 한국문학연구, (28), pp.99~121 (2005), 한국문학연구소
- 김재완, "사민필지에 대한 소고", 문화역사지리, 13(2) (2001)
- 민현식, "개화기 한글본 ‘사민필지’에 대하여", 국어교육, 100 (1999)
- 박영미, "하정 여규형 문학 일고찰", 漢文學論集, 21 (2003)
- 박진수, "韓國의 漢文廢止 論爭의 史的 考察", 동방한문학, (47), pp.175~218 (2011), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 박충록, "조선후기 삼대시인 연구: 김택영․황현․이건창" (1993), 이회문화사
- 吳允熙, "滄江 金澤榮論 : 그의 歷史意識과 文章報國을 中心으로", 교육논총, 3 (1983)
- 이광린, "한국 개화사 연구" (1969), 일조각
- 이근영, "<사민필지(士民必知)>의 음운론적 연구", 한말연구, (28), pp.201~230 (2011), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 이기문, "開化期 國文 使用에 관한 硏究", 韓國文化, 5 (1984)
- 이성민, "大東學會月報 所載漢詩에 대한 일고찰", 퇴계학논총, 14 (2008)
- 이현희, "근대 한국어 시기의 언어관․문자관 연구" (2014), 소명출판
- 임혜영, "『사민필지』의 내용과 '묻는 말' 분석", 석사, 역사교육전공, pp.2012
- 최혜주, "韓國史市民講座 28", pp.28~28 (2001)
- 황재문, "전통적 지식인의 망국 인식 : 김윤식·김택영·박은식의 경우", 한국문화, (52), pp.315~335 (2010), 규장각한국학연구원
