麗末鮮初 世子 朝見의 추이와 그 의미: 昌王의 親朝 요청과 恭讓王 세자의 朝見
Crown prince’s visit to China at the end of Goryeo and in the early years of Joseon: Examination of the King Chang-Wang(昌王)’s failed visit attempt and the crown prince's, son of the King Gong yang-Wang(恭讓王), visit to China
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Examined in this article is King Gongyang-wang(恭讓王)s dispatching[朝見] of his son and crown prince(世子) to China, and how such sending was related to the earlier attempt to arrange King Chang-wang(昌王)s Chinjo(親朝) visit to Ming(明). Even after Yi Seong-gye(李成桂) turned his troops around at Wihwa-do(威化島), King Wu-wang(禑王)s legitimacy was not officially challenged, and therefore his son Chang-wang was allowed to be enthroned. But Ming emperor Hongmu-je(洪武帝), under the name of not recognizing the person in throne apparently erected by vassals who killed the former king, denied the Goryeo kings request. In response, Yi Seong-gye raised the notion of both Wu-wang and Chang-wang being the son of Shin Don(辛禑辛昌論), and under the name of reviving the country, replaced Chang-wang with a new King Gongyang-wang. He then arranged the son of Gongyang-wang, now newly established as the crown prince himself, to visit China and pay respect to the Ming court(朝見). The plan was also set in motion due to the new stance of the Ming emperor who intended to strengthen its control over Goryeo by recognizing the new king and government on the Korean peninsula. Yi and other leaders of Goryeo wanted to stabilize their footing and not to mention their regime by securing Mings authorization of Gongyang-wangs enthronement which would hopefully be accomplished through the meeting between the Ming emperor and the Crown prince of Goryeo. But by the time the envoy arrived at Sukju(肅州), Gongyang-wang too was kicked out of the throne, so the request for the authorization was effectively nullified. But the attempt itself, arranging a crown princes visit to China in order to legitimize a weak kings enthronement as well as his naming of his own successor, remained in the minds of the Goryeo people as an effective way of bringing a fixation upon the supposed line of succession. The attempt was repeated in the early days of Joseon too, as we can see from the example of Joseon King Taejongs reign, when a crown prince was sent to China for a similar purpose.
Abstract
Examined in this article is King Gongyang-wang(恭讓王)s dispatching[朝見] of his son and crown prince(世子) to China, and how such sending was related to the earlier attempt to arrange King Chang-wang(昌王)s Chinjo(親朝) visit to Ming(明). Even after Yi Seong-gye(李成桂) turned his troops around at Wihwa-do(威化島), King Wu-wang(禑王)s legitimacy was not officially challenged, and therefore his son Chang-wang was allowed to be enthroned. But Ming emperor Hongmu-je(洪武帝), under the name of not recognizing the person in throne apparently erected by vassals who killed the former king, denied the Goryeo kings request. In response, Yi Seong-gye raised the notion of both Wu-wang and Chang-wang being the son of Shin Don(辛禑辛昌論), and under the name of reviving the country, replaced Chang-wang with a new King Gongyang-wang. He then arranged the son of Gongyang-wang, now newly established as the crown prince himself, to visit China and pay respect to the Ming court(朝見). The plan was also set in motion due to the new stance of the Ming emperor who intended to strengthen its control over Goryeo by recognizing the new king and government on the Korean peninsula. Yi and other leaders of Goryeo wanted to stabilize their footing and not to mention their regime by securing Mings authorization of Gongyang-wangs enthronement which would hopefully be accomplished through the meeting between the Ming emperor and the Crown prince of Goryeo. But by the time the envoy arrived at Sukju(肅州), Gongyang-wang too was kicked out of the throne, so the request for the authorization was effectively nullified. But the attempt itself, arranging a crown princes visit to China in order to legitimize a weak kings enthronement as well as his naming of his own successor, remained in the minds of the Goryeo people as an effective way of bringing a fixation upon the supposed line of succession. The attempt was repeated in the early days of Joseon too, as we can see from the example of Joseon King Taejongs reign, when a crown prince was sent to China for a similar purpose.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김순자, "韓國 中世 韓中關係史" (2007), 혜안
- 윤정, "숙종대 太祖 諡號의 追上과 政界의 인식- 조선 創業과 威化島回軍에 대한 재평가 -", 동방학지, (134), pp.219~259 (2006), 국학연구원
- "高麗史", ~
- 김당택, "이성계의 즉위와 공양왕", 역사학연구, (38), pp.127~152 (2010), 호남사학회
- 김당택, "이성계와 조준·정도전의 조선왕조 개창" (2012), 전남대출판부
- 김경록, "공민왕대 국제정세와 대외관계의 전개양상", 역사와 현실, (64), pp.197~231 (2007), 한국역사연구회
- 朴天植, "高麗 禑王代의 政治權力의 性格과 그 推移", 全北史學, 4 (1980)
- 朴宰佑, "高麗 恭讓王代 官制改革과 權力構造", 震檀學報, 81 (1996)
- 金塘澤, "高麗 禑王 元年(1375) 元과의 외교관계 再開를 둘러싼 정치세력 간의 갈등", 震檀學報, 83 (1997)
- 김순자, "元·明 교체와 麗末鮮初의 華夷論", 한국중세사연구, 10 (2001)
- 이형우, "우왕의 정치에 대한 일고찰 - 출생배경과 폐위, 죽음을 중심으로 -", 한국인물사연구, (16), pp.129~171 (2011), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 홍영의, "고려말 창왕대 '개혁파' 신흥유신의 결집과 분기과정", 한국중세사연구, (16), pp.135~180 (2004), 한국중세사학회
- 한충희, "朝鮮 太宗王權의 政治的基盤 硏究", 大丘史學, 63 (2001)
- 윤두수, "禑昌非王說의 硏究", 考古歷史學志, 5·6 (1990)
- 김당택, "高麗 昌王 元年(1389)의 金佇事件", 全南史學, 12 (1998)
- "高麗史節要", ~
- 이명미, "고려 말 정치·권력구조의 한 측면", 동국사학, (58), pp.81~116 (2015), 동국역사문화연구소
- "明太祖實錄", ~
- 윤정, "定宗의 즉위 과정과 즉위 명분 - 1차 왕자의 난과 神懿王后 추존 -", 진단학보, (119), pp.81~112 (2013), 진단학회
- 윤정, "정종대 상왕 태조의 임어와 개성 덕수궁", 서울학연구, (58), pp.167~208 (2015), 서울학연구소
- "太宗實錄", ~
- "太祖實錄 권1, 總序", ~
- 李佑成, "牧隱 李穡의 生涯와 思想" (1996), 일조각
- 배숙희, "元末ㆍ明初의 雲南과 故元 後裔의 濟州 移住", 동양사학연구, (119), pp.197~226 (2012), 동양사학회
- "龍飛御天歌 70장", ~
- "世宗實錄", ~
- 신호웅, "제2부 한국중세사의 탐색 : 공민왕대 신돈의 개혁정치와 우창비왕설", 이화사학연구, (30), pp.187~200 (2003), 이화사학연구소
- 윤정, "太祖代貞陵건설의 정치사적 의미", 서울학연구, (37), pp.155~191 (2009), 서울학연구소
- 柳昌圭, "高麗末 崔瑩 勢力의 형성과 遼東攻略", 歷史學報, 143 (1994)
- 金永壽, "위화도 회군의 정치: 최영·이성계의 요동공벌 정쟁과 이색·이성계의 정치개혁·정통성 논쟁", 韓國政治學會報, 33(1) (1999)
- "明史", ~
- 남지대, "조선 태종의 권위 확충", 규장각, (45), pp.39~67 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원
