본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

書啓에 대한 考察

A Study on Seogye

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The original meaning of Seogye was a written report and was used as the relative term of Gugye which refers to a verbal report. This meaning of Seogye continued throughout the Joseon Dynasty. In particular, the usage of Seogye substantially increased from the reign of the King Seongjong. Seogye started to divide into many independent documents since the reign of King Jungjong. First, Gyesa became the first independent document among Seogye. Seogye, which later evolves into Chogi, was recorded as ‘~意啓曰’ and ‘~言啓曰’ and previous Seogye was recorded as ‘書啓曰’. Then, Seogye which was recorded as ‘~意啓曰’ and ‘~言啓曰’ evolved into an independent document of Chogi. Hence, Seogye has become a document for a public official who executed the King’s command to make a report since the reign of King Myeongjong. In regard to the format of Seogye, the clear definition has not been confirmed. Only, the format of the document has been presumed based on law books, historical records, Seogye’s draft, Deungrok. 傳諭書啓 directly recorded body without beginning. At the body of 傳諭書啓, process of delivering king’s command was written. Also, 附奏 which is the answer of the recipient was written in quotation format. At the end of 傳諭書啓, writer’s job title and full name were written. In relation to the 御史書啓, first, the principal was to put writer’s job title and then his family name at the beginning. However, exceptional cases with full name and job title with official ranking title instead of job title were found. Second, the processes and results of the execution under the King’s command were written at the body of 御史書啓. Basically, the same conventional phrase which is equal to closing remark of 御史書啓’s body and closing remark of Janggye’s body was used. But there were some cases without a conventional phrase. Third, at the end of Seogye, era name with year, date, writer’s job title, full name were written. Only, some cases used sexagenary cycle instead of era name with year, job title with official ranking instead of job title. 802 cases of Seogye were recorded with direct quotation format in the King Jeongjong’s Records of Daily Reflections and these could be divided into five categories according to the content and writer. First, 傳諭書啓 is a Seogye when a public officer with the King’s command makes the report after completing 傳諭 to state councilors and confucian intellectuals, taking up 70% at 563 cases. Second, 奉審摘奸書啓 is a Seogye when a public officer with the King’s command makes a report after completing Bongsim and Jeokgan, taking up 17% at 140 cases. Third, 御史書啓 is a Seogye when a censor with the King’s command makes a report, taking up 7% at 54 cases. Fourth, 看病書啓 is a Seogye when a royal physician with the King’s command diagnoses the condition of liege’s disease and makes a report after cure, taking up 5% at 38 cases. Lastly, 7 cases of other Seogye which can not be included in the above category, taking up less than 1% of the total.

Abstract

The original meaning of Seogye was a written report and was used as the relative term of Gugye which refers to a verbal report. This meaning of Seogye continued throughout the Joseon Dynasty. In particular, the usage of Seogye substantially increased from the reign of the King Seongjong. Seogye started to divide into many independent documents since the reign of King Jungjong. First, Gyesa became the first independent document among Seogye. Seogye, which later evolves into Chogi, was recorded as ‘~意啓曰’ and ‘~言啓曰’ and previous Seogye was recorded as ‘書啓曰’. Then, Seogye which was recorded as ‘~意啓曰’ and ‘~言啓曰’ evolved into an independent document of Chogi. Hence, Seogye has become a document for a public official who executed the King’s command to make a report since the reign of King Myeongjong. In regard to the format of Seogye, the clear definition has not been confirmed. Only, the format of the document has been presumed based on law books, historical records, Seogye’s draft, Deungrok. 傳諭書啓 directly recorded body without beginning. At the body of 傳諭書啓, process of delivering king’s command was written. Also, 附奏 which is the answer of the recipient was written in quotation format. At the end of 傳諭書啓, writer’s job title and full name were written. In relation to the 御史書啓, first, the principal was to put writer’s job title and then his family name at the beginning. However, exceptional cases with full name and job title with official ranking title instead of job title were found. Second, the processes and results of the execution under the King’s command were written at the body of 御史書啓. Basically, the same conventional phrase which is equal to closing remark of 御史書啓’s body and closing remark of Janggye’s body was used. But there were some cases without a conventional phrase. Third, at the end of Seogye, era name with year, date, writer’s job title, full name were written. Only, some cases used sexagenary cycle instead of era name with year, job title with official ranking instead of job title. 802 cases of Seogye were recorded with direct quotation format in the King Jeongjong’s Records of Daily Reflections and these could be divided into five categories according to the content and writer. First, 傳諭書啓 is a Seogye when a public officer with the King’s command makes the report after completing 傳諭 to state councilors and confucian intellectuals, taking up 70% at 563 cases. Second, 奉審摘奸書啓 is a Seogye when a public officer with the King’s command makes a report after completing Bongsim and Jeokgan, taking up 17% at 140 cases. Third, 御史書啓 is a Seogye when a censor with the King’s command makes a report, taking up 7% at 54 cases. Fourth, 看病書啓 is a Seogye when a royal physician with the King’s command diagnoses the condition of liege’s disease and makes a report after cure, taking up 5% at 38 cases. Lastly, 7 cases of other Seogye which can not be included in the above category, taking up less than 1% of the total.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 최승희, "朝鮮初期 言官·言論硏究", pp.33~ (1997), 서울대학교 출판부
  2. 목정균, "朝鮮前期 制度言論硏究", pp.151~164 (1985), 고려대학교 민족문화연구소
  3. "태종실록", ~
  4. "세종실록", ~
  5. "선조실록", ~
  6. "銀臺便攷", ~
  7. "別軍職書啓草冊", ~
  8. "宣傳官書啓草冊", 奎7871의 2, ~
  9. "書啓謄錄", 奎13018, ~
  10. "書啓輯錄", 奎15083- v.1-9, ~
  11. "湖南書啓草", 古5120-70, ~
  12. "東來御史書啓", 古6370-1, ~
  13. "晩翠公黃海道暗行御史書啓抄", 古4255.5-5, ~
  14. "繡衣錄", 古4250-102, ~
  15. "聞見事件", 奎7767-2, ~
  16. "南行錄", 古4259- 53, ~
  17. "西繡日記", 古4790-29, ~
  18. "書啓(2책)", ~
  19. "조선왕조실록", 국사편찬위원회[URL]
  20. "세조실록 권20, 6년 6월 25일 庚午", ~
  21. "예종실록 1년 3월 6일 庚寅", ~
  22. "성종실록", ~
  23. "중종실록", ~
  24. 이강욱, "啓辭에 대한 考察-承政院日記를 중심으로-", 古文書硏究, 37, pp.123~164 (2010), 한국고문서학회
  25. 이강욱, "臺諫 啓辭에 대한 考察", 古文書硏究, 45, pp.113~158 (2014), 한국고문서학회
  26. "百憲摠要", ~
  27. "典律通補", ~
  28. "芝峰類說 卷17, 「雜事部」 故實", ~
  29. "銀臺條例", ~
  30. "명종실록", ~
  31. 이강욱, "『承政院日記』를 통해 본 草記의 전면적 考察", 민족문화, 34(34), pp.307~354 (2010), 한국고전번역원
  32. "續大典", ~
  33. "大典通編", ~
  34. "승정원일기", ~
  35. "일성록", ~
  36. "한국국학진흥원 소장, 안동 하회 풍산류씨 화경당, 1799년 4월 27일자", 한국학자료센터 영남권역센터[URL]
  37. 명경일, "정조대 傳敎軸을 통해 본 『承政院日記』의 문서 謄錄 체계", 古文書硏究, 44, pp.77~116 (2014), 한국고문서학회
  38. "규장각 소장 120778, 全羅左道暗行御史李萬敎書啓·書啓草", 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원[URL]
  39. "규장각 소장 159173, 忠淸左道暗行御史書啓·書啓草", 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원[URL]
  40. "규장각 소장 古5120- 70, 湖南書啓草", 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원[URL]
  41. "六典條例", ~
  42. "정조실록 권8, 3년 9월 28일 己酉", ~
  43. 이강욱, "《日省錄》 別單의 형식 및 분류", 민족문화, 44, pp.121~177 (2014), 한국고전번역원[DOI]
  44. "經國大典 禮典 藏文書", ~
  45. "通文館志 권3, 「事大」 赴京使行", ~
  46. "增訂交隣志 권5, 通信使行", ~
  47. "東槎日記 坤 聞見錄", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)