본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘경계성(liminality)’의 표지와 시의 인식론적 지평: 1950년대 김춘수와 김종삼의 시를 중심으로

The representation of liminality and the cognitive horizon in the 1950s’ poetry of Kim Choon-su and Kim Jong-sam

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper is to figure out the meaning of the boundary marks in the poetry of the 1950s Modernists, Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam, focusing on the various spatial images representing the epistemological thought. Their thought about liminality is appeared in the images of a man walking over the barren surface, refusing to be a settler. In the way of passing through somewhere, the poetic subject is walking willfully with his eyes fixed on the distant horizon. But the unattainable horizon always make him deficient. In their poetry, this image of deficient subject coincides with the image of objects that disappears from the sight of subject with vibrating between the visible and the invisible. The subject only gaze at the object, but does not know its depth and its sadness, which shows that the object is another individual having its own world and cannot be reproduced in the subject’s thought and language. So, in the poetry of Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam, the spatial images of a boundary or margin, such as “the end of the branch,” “the top of the stairs,” or “the half-open door,” are very symbolic, because they are representing the poets’ thought of liminality and desire to infinity, where clear perception of the subject and reproducible representation of the language have disappeared. These spatial images of border symbolize the interface between reality and infinity, visibility and non-visibility, revealing the subject and poetic language that desires the world beyond the limit. In this context, the fleeting moments symbolizing eternity in Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam’s poems represent a mysterious “state of ecstasy”, but it is only a illusion beyond the horizon, shown to the subject instantly. Through their works, Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam tried to explore the existence of each subject independent of ideologies. Their poetic aims are ultimately to build the poetic spaces that are separate from reality and ideology, extending the poems’ horizons to the infinity. It is not just a disagreement with the world or an escape from the world but a critical negativity against the materialized world based on the ideology of “purpose-rationality”. Above all, the poetic language and images of Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam are important touchstones in the genealogy of modernism in the sense of representing the poets’ epistemological thought. It is well known that 1960s modernism poetry is focused on the individual and his inner problems with a high degree of consciousness about poetic language. This subsequent tendency searching on modern self as anti-uniformity and self-indulgent language was prepared by Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam in a pioneering way.

Abstract

This paper is to figure out the meaning of the boundary marks in the poetry of the 1950s Modernists, Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam, focusing on the various spatial images representing the epistemological thought. Their thought about liminality is appeared in the images of a man walking over the barren surface, refusing to be a settler. In the way of passing through somewhere, the poetic subject is walking willfully with his eyes fixed on the distant horizon. But the unattainable horizon always make him deficient. In their poetry, this image of deficient subject coincides with the image of objects that disappears from the sight of subject with vibrating between the visible and the invisible. The subject only gaze at the object, but does not know its depth and its sadness, which shows that the object is another individual having its own world and cannot be reproduced in the subject’s thought and language. So, in the poetry of Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam, the spatial images of a boundary or margin, such as “the end of the branch,” “the top of the stairs,” or “the half-open door,” are very symbolic, because they are representing the poets’ thought of liminality and desire to infinity, where clear perception of the subject and reproducible representation of the language have disappeared. These spatial images of border symbolize the interface between reality and infinity, visibility and non-visibility, revealing the subject and poetic language that desires the world beyond the limit. In this context, the fleeting moments symbolizing eternity in Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam’s poems represent a mysterious “state of ecstasy”, but it is only a illusion beyond the horizon, shown to the subject instantly. Through their works, Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam tried to explore the existence of each subject independent of ideologies. Their poetic aims are ultimately to build the poetic spaces that are separate from reality and ideology, extending the poems’ horizons to the infinity. It is not just a disagreement with the world or an escape from the world but a critical negativity against the materialized world based on the ideology of “purpose-rationality”. Above all, the poetic language and images of Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam are important touchstones in the genealogy of modernism in the sense of representing the poets’ epistemological thought. It is well known that 1960s modernism poetry is focused on the individual and his inner problems with a high degree of consciousness about poetic language. This subsequent tendency searching on modern self as anti-uniformity and self-indulgent language was prepared by Kim Chun-soo and Kim Jong-sam in a pioneering way.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 남진우, "미적 근대성과 순간의 시학", pp.14~ (2001), 소명출판
  2. 이하윤, "현대시인연구: 사상파 시인들", 동아일보, ~ (1930)
  3. 김규동, "현대시의 연구", pp.203~ (1972), 한일출판사
  4. 김예리, "김춘수의 ‘무의미시론’ 비판과 시의 타자성", 한국현대문학연구, (38), pp.241~278 (2012), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
  5. 문혜원, "한국현대시론사" (2007), 역락
  6. 남기혁, "김춘수의 무의미시론 연구", 한국문화, 24 (1999)
  7. 이광호, "자유의 시학과 미적 현대성-김수영과 김춘수 시론에 나타난 '무의미'의 문제를 중심으로", 한국시학연구, (12), pp.271~297 (2005), 한국시학회
  8. 김유중, "김춘수 문학을 어떻게 이해할 것인가", 한국현대문학연구, (30), pp.443~466 (2010), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
  9. 진수미, "김춘수 초기 시의 역사 인식 문제", 민족문학사연구, (45), pp.194~219 (2011), 민족문학사연구소
  10. 여태천, "감각과 관념의 언어 실험 ― 김춘수 초기시에 대하여", 한국근대문학연구, 18(2), pp.35~66 (2017), 한국근대문학회
  11. 손병희, "김춘수의 시와 존재의 슬픔 - 초기시를 중심으로", 국어교육연구, (50), pp.525~548 (2012), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  12. 임봄, "김춘수 초기 시에 나타나는 고독의 의미 연구", 한국문예창작, 17(1), pp.43~75 (2018), 한국문예창작학회
  13. 이성희, "김춘수 시의 우울 연구", 한국현대문학연구, (28), pp.457~486 (2009), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
  14. 전재형, "김춘수 초기시의 근대성 연구", 한남어문학, 30 (2014)
  15. 서진영, "1950-60년대 모더니즘 시의 이미지와 자아 인식 - 김춘수와 문덕수의 시를 중심으로", 한국현대문학연구, (33), pp.371~399 (2011), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
  16. 황동규, "북치는 소년" (1979), 민음사
  17. 이경수, "김종삼전집" (1988), 청하
  18. 이숭원, "20세기 한국 시인론" (1997), 국학자료원
  19. 오형엽, "1950년대 시인들" (1994), 나남
  20. 김기택, "김종삼 시의 현실 인식 방법의 특성 연구", 한국시학연구, (12), pp.175~208 (2005), 한국시학회
  21. 한명희, "한국현대시인론 2" (2005), 다운샘
  22. 서진영, "김종삼의 시적 공간에 나타난 순례적 상상력", 인문논총, (68), pp.225~252 (2012), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  23. 김지녀, "「라산스카」의 의미에 대한 시론(試論) - 김종삼의 시와 음악", 한국문학이론과 비평, 17(3), pp.27~48 (2013), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  24. 정슬아, "김종삼 시에 나타난 윤리적 주체의 가능성", 돈암어문학, 26, pp.127~155 (2013), 돈암어문학회[DOI]
  25. 송현지, "김종삼 시에 나타난 시인으로서의 소명 의식 연구", 한국문학이론과 비평, 17(4), pp.49~75 (2013), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  26. Edward W. Soja, "Social Relations and Spatial Structures", pp.93~ (1985), St. Martin's Press
  27. 미셀 콜로, "현대시와 지평구조", pp.86~ (2003), 문학과 지성사
  28. 신범순, "한국 현대시의 퇴폐와 작은 주체", pp.231~232 (1998), 신구문화사
  29. 河希靜, "1950년대 시에 나타난 ‘부재 의식’의 형상화 양상 연구 : 金春洙와 金宗三을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
  30. 曺永福, "1950년대 모더니즘 시에 있어서 `내적 체험'의 기호화 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1992
  31. 박은희, "김춘수 시에 나타난 시간성", 돈암어문학, 12 (1999)
  32. 류순태, "김소월 시의 경계 의식에 내재된 미적 욕망과 그 근대성 연구", 한국시학연구, (36), pp.181~207 (2013), 한국시학회[DOI]
  33. 김현, "시인을 찾아서", pp.238~ (1975), 민음사
  34. K. H. Bohrer, "절대적 현존", pp.241~ (1998), 문학동네
  35. M. Heidegger, "존재와 시간", pp.382~ (1995), 경문사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)