본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

正統帝의 등극과 조선-명 관계의 큰 변화: 조선 세종대 양국 관계 안정화의 한 배경

Emperor Zhengtong’s Enthronement as a Turning Point in the Joseon-Ming Relationship

1

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper examines to which extent the Joseon-Ming relationship showed a very different development during the Zhengtong era (1436-1449) compared to the Yongle- Xuande era (1403-1435). It is argued that Emperor Zhengtong’s enthronement brought about a stabilization of the Joseon-Ming relationship. Both Youngle and Xuande Emperors took great interest in Joseon. They sought Joseon women as concubines for the imperial harem and found delight in Joseon food and music. Falcons and hounds from Joseon added a special touch to the emperor's hobby of hunting. Those who were in charge of running the Emperor’s errands were the eunuchs. Two eunuchs, Huáng Yăn, serving under Emperor Yongle, and Chāng Shèng, serving under Emperor Xuande, frequently visited Seoul over a period of more than 30 years. The emperor's orders in most cases were not written but oral messages. Thus, the instructions could remain unnoticed by the officials of the outer court. The Joseon court faced great difficulties trying to match the personal tastes of the two emperors, who at the same time were profligate, so that King Taejong and Sejong struggled hard to meet the greedy eunuchs’ demands each time they visited Seoul. The benefits, however, where not totally one-sided. Joseon received considerable help by the eunuchs in dealing with sensitive diplomatic issues. Behind the scenes, the eunuchs played a tremendous role in smoothing out the two countries’ relations, which during the preceding Hongwu era (1368-1398) had scarcely seen untroubled days. The situation changed dramatically with emperor Zhengtong’s accession to the throne. The young Emperor, who had just passed the age of seven payed little attention to Joseon. The grand empress dowager, who served as the regent, and wise men of the outer court, including the Three Yangs, sent back a large number of women from Joseon who had been selected by the previous Emperors. The eunuchs that had previously bullied Joseon also fell out of favor with the new emperor and were never sent to Seoul again. The practice of undocumented, oral messages from the Emperor also disappeared. Emperor Zhengtong reminds us of the Tumu Crisis, bringing to mind the manipulations of the eunuch Wang Zhen. Fortunately however, the interests of both did not extend to Joseon. With Emperor Zhengtong’s enthronement, the Joseon-Ming relationship suddenly entered a stable stage without major occurrences. Bereft of the influential contact persons they could please with words and bribes, the Joseon envoys now had to prepare documents in due form and negotiate with the fastidious officials of the Ministry of Rites. This change can be solely attributed to the new emperor. Thus, there were times when the emperors took interest in Joseon and tried to satisfy their needs through diplomacy with Joseon, and other times when they did not show such engagement. In the Ming dynasty, foreign affairs effectively were the emperor’s personal business.

Abstract

This paper examines to which extent the Joseon-Ming relationship showed a very different development during the Zhengtong era (1436-1449) compared to the Yongle- Xuande era (1403-1435). It is argued that Emperor Zhengtong’s enthronement brought about a stabilization of the Joseon-Ming relationship. Both Youngle and Xuande Emperors took great interest in Joseon. They sought Joseon women as concubines for the imperial harem and found delight in Joseon food and music. Falcons and hounds from Joseon added a special touch to the emperor's hobby of hunting. Those who were in charge of running the Emperor’s errands were the eunuchs. Two eunuchs, Huáng Yăn, serving under Emperor Yongle, and Chāng Shèng, serving under Emperor Xuande, frequently visited Seoul over a period of more than 30 years. The emperor's orders in most cases were not written but oral messages. Thus, the instructions could remain unnoticed by the officials of the outer court. The Joseon court faced great difficulties trying to match the personal tastes of the two emperors, who at the same time were profligate, so that King Taejong and Sejong struggled hard to meet the greedy eunuchs’ demands each time they visited Seoul. The benefits, however, where not totally one-sided. Joseon received considerable help by the eunuchs in dealing with sensitive diplomatic issues. Behind the scenes, the eunuchs played a tremendous role in smoothing out the two countries’ relations, which during the preceding Hongwu era (1368-1398) had scarcely seen untroubled days. The situation changed dramatically with emperor Zhengtong’s accession to the throne. The young Emperor, who had just passed the age of seven payed little attention to Joseon. The grand empress dowager, who served as the regent, and wise men of the outer court, including the Three Yangs, sent back a large number of women from Joseon who had been selected by the previous Emperors. The eunuchs that had previously bullied Joseon also fell out of favor with the new emperor and were never sent to Seoul again. The practice of undocumented, oral messages from the Emperor also disappeared. Emperor Zhengtong reminds us of the Tumu Crisis, bringing to mind the manipulations of the eunuch Wang Zhen. Fortunately however, the interests of both did not extend to Joseon. With Emperor Zhengtong’s enthronement, the Joseon-Ming relationship suddenly entered a stable stage without major occurrences. Bereft of the influential contact persons they could please with words and bribes, the Joseon envoys now had to prepare documents in due form and negotiate with the fastidious officials of the Ministry of Rites. This change can be solely attributed to the new emperor. Thus, there were times when the emperors took interest in Joseon and tried to satisfy their needs through diplomacy with Joseon, and other times when they did not show such engagement. In the Ming dynasty, foreign affairs effectively were the emperor’s personal business.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 박원호, "고려말 조선초 대명외교의 우여곡절", 한국사시민강좌, 36 (2005)
  2. 정동훈, "몽골제국의 붕괴와 고려-명의 유산 상속분쟁", 역사비평, (121), pp.77~98 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
  3. 全海宗, "韓中關係史", pp.50~51 (1970), 一潮閣
  4. John K. Fairbank, "Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations", pp.16~ (1968), Harvard University Press
  5. 박원호, "신편 한국사 22" (1995), 국사편찬위원회
  6. 조영헌, "15세기 한중 관계사― 禮制的一元的 책봉ㆍ조공의 확립 ―", 동양사학연구, (140), pp.1~42 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
  7. 安貞姬, "朝鮮初期의 事大論", 歷史敎育, 64 (1997)
  8. 한명기, "세종문화사대계 3" (2001), 세종대왕기념사업회
  9. 박성주, "조선 초기 遣明 使節에 대한 일고찰", 경주사학, 19, pp.156~158 (2000)
  10. 구도영, "조선 전기 對明 陸路使行의 형태와 실상", 진단학보, (117), pp.59~97 (2013), 진단학회
  11. "세조실록", ~
  12. 末松保和, "靑丘史草 1", pp.424~425 (1965), 笠井出版印刷社
  13. 정동훈, "한국의 대외관계와 외교사 조선편", pp.117~ (2018), 동북아역사재단
  14. 정동훈, "永樂帝의 말과 글 - 영락 연간 조선-명 관계의 두 층위 -", 한국문화, (78), pp.151~182 (2017), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  15. 정동훈, "宣德帝의 말과 글: 서울과 북경에서 바라본 황제의 두 얼굴", 한국문화, (87), pp.61~85 (2019), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  16. "태종실록", ~
  17. 임상훈, "明初 朝鮮 貢女의 性格", 동양사학연구, (122), pp.173~208 (2013), 동양사학회
  18. 서인범, "자금성의 노을: 중국 황제의 후궁이 된 조선 자매" (2019), 역사인
  19. 鄭求先, "鮮初 朝鮮出身 明 使臣의 行蹟", 慶熙史學, 23, pp.113~114 (2004)
  20. "세종실록", ~
  21. 姜性文, "竹堂李炫熙敎授華甲紀念 韓國史學論叢" (1997), 東方圖書
  22. 朴元熇, "明初 朝鮮關係史 硏究" (2002), 一潮閣
  23. 김순자, "韓國 中世 韓中關係史" (2007), 혜안
  24. 이규철, "조선초기의 對外征伐과 對明意識", 박사, 국사학과 한국근세사전공, pp.2013
  25. 曺永祿, "鮮初의 朝鮮出身 明使考", 國史館論叢, 14 (1990)
  26. 陳學霖, "明代人物與傳說" (1997), 中文大學出版社
  27. 陳學霖, "明代人物與史料" (2001), 中文大學出版社
  28. 구범진, "역주 이문 中", pp.1~10 (2012), 세창출판사
  29. "태조실록", ~
  30. 柳承宙, "朝鮮前期 對明貿易이 國內産業에 미친 影響", 亞細亞硏究, 82, pp.6~7 (1989)
  31. "고려사", ~
  32. 胡丹, "明代宦官史料長篇 上冊", pp.236~ (2014), 鳳凰出版社
  33. 湯綱, "明史 上", pp.207~210 (1985), 上海人民出版社
  34. 冷東, "明初三楊與宦官關系論略", 汕頭大學學報(人文科學版), 8(2) (1992)
  35. 楊國楨, "明史新編", pp.142~146 (1993), 人民出版社
  36. Denis Twitchett, "The Cambridge History of China 7", pp.305~309 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  37. 孟森, "明史講義", pp.132~136 (2019), 江蘇人民出版社
  38. 張治安, "明代政治制度硏究" (1991), 聯經出版事業公司
  39. 이규철, "세종대 對外征伐 정책의 본격화와 對明意識", 한국문화, (67), pp.201~224 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  40. 이규철, "세종대 파저강(婆猪江) 재정벌(再征伐)과 대외정벌 정책", 군사, (95), pp.333~361 (2015), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
  41. "明太宗實錄", ~
  42. 정동훈, "洪武帝의 명령이 고려에 전달되는 경로― 聖旨의 문서화 과정을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (139), pp.219~255 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
  43. 李鉉淙, "明使接待考", 鄕土서울, 12 (1961)
  44. 張德信, "明代職官年表 1", pp.442~461 (2009), 黃山書社
  45. "太宗實錄", ~
  46. 김문식, "조선시대 중국 서적의 수입과 간행", 규장각, (29), pp.121~140 (2006), 규장각한국학연구원
  47. 吳恒寧, "朝鮮 世宗代 《資治通鑑思政殿訓義》와 《資治通鑑綱目思政殿訓義》의 編纂", 泰東古典硏究, 15 (1998)
  48. "문종실록", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)