명청교체기 瀋陽館의 역할
The Role of Shenyang-Guan(瀋陽館) during the Ming-Ch’ing Transition
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the second Manchu invasion in 1636(丙子胡亂) Sohyun(昭顯), crown prince of the Chosun had to stay in Shenyang(瀋陽) as a hostage for 8 years. During that time Sohyun and his accompanying officials at Shenyang-Guan(瀋陽館) carried out many works and negotiations that had occurred between the Chosun and the Ch'ing. These role executions came from not only the urgency of the tasks, but also from the role expectations about Shenyang-Guan which the Chosun and the Ch'ing had. Continuously calling attention to the status of a hostage, the Ch'ing pressed Sohyun to gain advantages and tried to use Shenyang-Guan as a substitute for the royal court of Chosun. Under the dominant power of the Ch’ing, sometimes Shenyang-Guan had to yield to the threats. Despite all the difficulties, Shenyang- Guan made an effort to represent the positions of Chosun and reduce losses of Chosun. The role of Shenyang-Guan was extended as the royal court of Chosun began to depend on information about the Ch’ing through Shenyang-Guan and tolerated discretion of Shenyang-Guan. This situation eventually became the cause of the conflict between Sohyun and King Injo(仁祖). Internally having discords with the royal court of Chosun, Shenyang-Guan had to continue to face the postwar settlement issued by the Ch’ing. In problems such as buying back captives after war, being drafted from the Chosun, comings and goings of diplomatic delegations and offering tributes, Shenyang-Guan performed as a main diplomatic window. In addition Shenyang-Guan was the center collecting and delivering informations about the Ch’ing. For such activities Shenyang-Guan overcame their situation as a hostage, performed the role of a representative of the royal court of Chosun and contributed to building a new relationship between Chosun and Ch’ing.
Abstract
After the second Manchu invasion in 1636(丙子胡亂) Sohyun(昭顯), crown prince of the Chosun had to stay in Shenyang(瀋陽) as a hostage for 8 years. During that time Sohyun and his accompanying officials at Shenyang-Guan(瀋陽館) carried out many works and negotiations that had occurred between the Chosun and the Ch'ing. These role executions came from not only the urgency of the tasks, but also from the role expectations about Shenyang-Guan which the Chosun and the Ch'ing had. Continuously calling attention to the status of a hostage, the Ch'ing pressed Sohyun to gain advantages and tried to use Shenyang-Guan as a substitute for the royal court of Chosun. Under the dominant power of the Ch’ing, sometimes Shenyang-Guan had to yield to the threats. Despite all the difficulties, Shenyang- Guan made an effort to represent the positions of Chosun and reduce losses of Chosun. The role of Shenyang-Guan was extended as the royal court of Chosun began to depend on information about the Ch’ing through Shenyang-Guan and tolerated discretion of Shenyang-Guan. This situation eventually became the cause of the conflict between Sohyun and King Injo(仁祖). Internally having discords with the royal court of Chosun, Shenyang-Guan had to continue to face the postwar settlement issued by the Ch’ing. In problems such as buying back captives after war, being drafted from the Chosun, comings and goings of diplomatic delegations and offering tributes, Shenyang-Guan performed as a main diplomatic window. In addition Shenyang-Guan was the center collecting and delivering informations about the Ch’ing. For such activities Shenyang-Guan overcame their situation as a hostage, performed the role of a representative of the royal court of Chosun and contributed to building a new relationship between Chosun and Ch’ing.
참고문헌 (28)
- 京城帝國大學法文學部, "解題. in: 瀋陽狀啓", pp.7~ (1935), 京城帝國大學法文學部
- 田川孝三, "瀋館考", 小田先生頌壽記念朝鮮論集 (1934)
- 김용덕, "소현세자연구", 사학연구, 18, pp.440~447 (1964)
- 이성무, "조선시대 당쟁사, 1", pp.239~ (2000), 동방미디어
- 최소자, "청과 조선", pp.147~ (2005), 혜안
- 송미령, "入關 前 淸朝의 瀋陽館 統制樣相", 명청사연구, (30), pp.129~155 (2008), 명청사학회
- 이은영, "조선 인조대의 심양관", 석사, pp.2008
- 이영춘, "조선후기 왕위계승연구" (1998), 집문당
- 정하영, "심양장계: 심양에서 온 편지" (2008), 창비
- "역주 소현심양일기, 1-4" (2008), 민속원
- "역주 소현분조일기" (2008), 민속원
- "인조실록", ~
- "승정원일기", ~
- 김남윤, "심양일기와 소현세자의 볼모살이", 규장각, 29, pp.52~ (2006)
- 성당제, "정묘호란시 소현분조와 세자의 역할 : 소현분조일기를 중심으로", 규장각, 31 (2007)
- 손종성, "임진왜란시 분조에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1992
- "선조실록", ~
- "국역 연려실기술", 민족문화추진회
- "順菴先生文集", ~
- 강세구, "雲溪 鄭雷卿의 순국에 관한 일고찰", 문명연지, 19, pp.117~ (2007)
- "비변사등록", ~
- "심양일기", ~
- 한명기, "정묘·병자호란과 동아시아", pp.166~168 (2009), 푸른역사
- 김두현, "淸朝政權의 성립과 발전. in: 강좌 중국사 Ⅳ", pp.154~ (1989), 지식산업사
- 박용옥, "丙子被擄人 贖還考", 사총, 9 (1964)
- 森岡康, "丁卯の亂後に於ける贖還問題", 朝鮮學報, 32 (1964)
- 전해종, "한중관계사연구", pp.71~75 (1970), 일조각
- 장존무, "근대한중무역사", pp.30~31 (2001), 교문사
