본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기 어느 성리학자의 家作과 그 지향 - 金興洛家 사례

A 19th-century Confucian scholar’s inherent concern in family farming and agricultural activities

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to explore the basic structure of agriculture in the late Choson, with the case of the family farming of Confucian Kim Heung-rak who was the head of Confucian scholars in Gyeongsang prefecture in the late nineteenth century. Confucian Kim did not tried to make an effort to increase his family’s property but to find the way of a save-the-nation and appeasing the people, when the nation and the people confronted with the crisis. In fact, because he owned the bulk of farmland(around 500 doorak) and labor powers (around 50 nobi families),he would have cultivated larger lands. However, he farmed small part of his owned lands (just around 15 doorak). Insead, he tried to diversify the products in upland field cropping. Due to diversifying the products in upland field cropping based on advanced agricultural techniques like keunjong (two crops a year 根種)and kanjong (intercropping 間種), Confucian Kim and the farmers in the Andong area in the nineteenth century could harvest more grains. Intensive farming represented as small quantity batch production (多品種 少量生産)is very different characteristic from mass production of a few selected items (少品種大量生産) of capitalist-farming. Generally, the capitalist-farming pursues labor productivity increase. The farmer pursuing the capitalist-farming selects and cultivates the grains capable of raising profits the most, and he buys the other grains not being cultivated by him at the market. By the way, the farmers doing small quantity batch production maintain much stabler life than the farmers doing mass production of a few selected items, because the former can product diverse products they need. They are not worried even if their farm surpluses are not sold, because they just sell the extra products they spend on. Considering on these facts, it seems that Confucian Kim and the people in the Andong in the nineteenth century hoped to live a secure life together, not selecting the way of coexistence in between opportunity [rich farmer] and crisis [poor farmer]; that is, Confucian Kim made an effort to find the way of appeasing the people.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the basic structure of agriculture in the late Choson, with the case of the family farming of Confucian Kim Heung-rak who was the head of Confucian scholars in Gyeongsang prefecture in the late nineteenth century. Confucian Kim did not tried to make an effort to increase his family’s property but to find the way of a save-the-nation and appeasing the people, when the nation and the people confronted with the crisis. In fact, because he owned the bulk of farmland(around 500 doorak) and labor powers (around 50 nobi families),he would have cultivated larger lands. However, he farmed small part of his owned lands (just around 15 doorak). Insead, he tried to diversify the products in upland field cropping. Due to diversifying the products in upland field cropping based on advanced agricultural techniques like keunjong (two crops a year 根種)and kanjong (intercropping 間種), Confucian Kim and the farmers in the Andong area in the nineteenth century could harvest more grains. Intensive farming represented as small quantity batch production (多品種 少量生産)is very different characteristic from mass production of a few selected items (少品種大量生産) of capitalist-farming. Generally, the capitalist-farming pursues labor productivity increase. The farmer pursuing the capitalist-farming selects and cultivates the grains capable of raising profits the most, and he buys the other grains not being cultivated by him at the market. By the way, the farmers doing small quantity batch production maintain much stabler life than the farmers doing mass production of a few selected items, because the former can product diverse products they need. They are not worried even if their farm surpluses are not sold, because they just sell the extra products they spend on. Considering on these facts, it seems that Confucian Kim and the people in the Andong in the nineteenth century hoped to live a secure life together, not selecting the way of coexistence in between opportunity [rich farmer] and crisis [poor farmer]; that is, Confucian Kim made an effort to find the way of appeasing the people.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Philip Huang, "The Peasant Family and Rural Development in the Yangzi Delta, 1350-1988" (1990), Stanford University Press
  2. "古文書集成 五", pp.681~716 (1989), 韓國精神文化硏究院
  3. "公車文", ~
  4. "歸田錄", ~
  5. "東萊統案 2책, (奎 18116)", ~
  6. "孟子", ~
  7. "西山先生文集", ~
  8. "西山先生文集", ~
  9. "日省錄", ~
  10. "渚上日月", ~
  11. "訓令照會存案", ~
  12. 金容燮, "조선후기농업사연구 Ⅰ" (1970), 一朝閣
  13. 金容燮, "18·9 世紀의 農業實情과 새로운 農業經營論", 大東文化硏究, 9 (1972)
  14. 琴章泰, "儒學近百年" (1984), 博英社
  15. 金喜坤, "안동 사람들의 항일투쟁" (2007), 지식산업사
  16. 김건태, "조선시대 양반가의 농업경영" (2004), 역사비평사
  17. 김건태, "조선후기 契의 재정운영 양상과 그 성격 -전라도 장흥군 용산면 上金里 書契를 중심으로-", 韓國史學報, (38), pp.285~323 (2010), 고려사학회
  18. 김건태, "18세기 중엽 私奴婢의 사회․경제적 성격 ―慶尙道安東金溪里義城金氏家사례", 대동문화연구, (75), pp.87~150 (2011), 대동문화연구원
  19. 德永勳美, "韓國總覽" (1907), 博文館藏版
  20. 朴基炷, "19·20세기초 在村兩班 地主經營의 動向, In 맛질의 農民들(安秉直·李榮薰 編著)" (2001), 一潮閣
  21. 박현순, "19세기 文科에 대한 고찰", 한국문화, (54), pp.33~70 (2011), 규장각한국학연구원
  22. "예천 맛질 朴氏家 日記 2", ~
  23. 李樹健, "退溪 李湟家의 재산 유래와 그 소유형태", 역사교육논집, 13 (1990)
  24. 이영훈, "농촌시장과 전국적 시장통합, 1713∼1937, In 수량경제사로 다시 본 조선후기" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  25. 정진영, "19~20세기전반 한 ‘몰락양반’가의 중소지주로의 성장과정 ― 경상도 단성현 김인섭가의 경우", 대동문화연구, (52), pp.347~399 (2005), 대동문화연구원
  26. 鄭震英, "19세기 중반∼20세기 초반 在村 兩班地主家의 농업경영―경상도 단성 金麟燮家의 家作地 경영을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (62), pp.105~148 (2008), 대동문화연구원
  27. 하야미 아끼라, "근세 일본의 경제발전과 근면 혁명" (2006), 혜안
  28. 河元鎬, "조선후기 도량형 「문란」의 원인 연구", 韓國史硏究, 59 (1987)
  29. "韓國學中央硏究院, MF003717", ~
  30. "韓國學中央硏究院, MF003722", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)