포항 중성리신라비 비문의 형식과 분쟁의 성격
The Form and Content of the Inscription of Pohang Jungseongri Silla Stone Monument
0
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Pohang Jungseongri Silla Stone Monument was discovered in 2009 and has been studied for over 2 years. However, its inscription couldn’t be understood because there are many lists of names and a few verbs. There is a gyo (敎, king’s order) in the inscription, but it has not been agreed on what the content of the gyo is. I think that it is because the inscription is not the record of the gyo itself, but that of the procedure to resolve a dispute by the gyo. The gyo was issued in the first sentence, but the content of it was not revealed. That was proclaimed by two officials dispatched to the place where the troubled object was located. The content of it was that the houses of Duji Saganji and Ilbuji should return the something to the farmers of Modanbeolwhe (牟旦伐喙). In the latter part of the inscription, a servant of Saganji said, “If someone raises objection, he will be heavily punished.”The words of the servant can be interpreted as a vow that his master would revive such a illegal act. Silla was formed of 6 bus (部, tribes) and was operated by them. Each bu possessed farmlands around the capital. Hwe-bu (喙部) and Sahwe-bu (沙喙部)directly under the king got to have more power by the early 6th century. Some relatives and close subjects of the king were transformed into aristocrats. Duji Saganji and Ilbuji seems to had been aristocrats from the relatives of the king. The dispute in the inscription was that the rising aristocrats’ families stole the farmland which Modanbeolhwe-bu had possessed. The judgement was to return the farmland immediately. However, the aristocrats weren't punished and their servant just vowed not to revive such a disseisin.
Abstract
Pohang Jungseongri Silla Stone Monument was discovered in 2009 and has been studied for over 2 years. However, its inscription couldn’t be understood because there are many lists of names and a few verbs. There is a gyo (敎, king’s order) in the inscription, but it has not been agreed on what the content of the gyo is. I think that it is because the inscription is not the record of the gyo itself, but that of the procedure to resolve a dispute by the gyo. The gyo was issued in the first sentence, but the content of it was not revealed. That was proclaimed by two officials dispatched to the place where the troubled object was located. The content of it was that the houses of Duji Saganji and Ilbuji should return the something to the farmers of Modanbeolwhe (牟旦伐喙). In the latter part of the inscription, a servant of Saganji said, “If someone raises objection, he will be heavily punished.”The words of the servant can be interpreted as a vow that his master would revive such a illegal act. Silla was formed of 6 bus (部, tribes) and was operated by them. Each bu possessed farmlands around the capital. Hwe-bu (喙部) and Sahwe-bu (沙喙部)directly under the king got to have more power by the early 6th century. Some relatives and close subjects of the king were transformed into aristocrats. Duji Saganji and Ilbuji seems to had been aristocrats from the relatives of the king. The dispute in the inscription was that the rising aristocrats’ families stole the farmland which Modanbeolhwe-bu had possessed. The judgement was to return the farmland immediately. However, the aristocrats weren't punished and their servant just vowed not to revive such a disseisin.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강종훈, "포항중성리신라비의 내용과 성격", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.131~169 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 고광의, "포항 중성리신라비 서체와 고신라 문자생활", 浦項 中城里新羅碑 발견기념 학술심포지엄 (2009), 국립경주문화재연구소
- 권인한, "포항 중성리신라비의 어문학적 검토", 浦項 中城里新羅碑 발견기념 학술심포지엄 (2009), 국립경주문화재연구소
- 김창석, "포항 中城里新羅碑에 관한 몇 가지 고찰", 한국사연구, (147), pp.379~400 (2009), 한국사연구회
- 김창석, "신라 법제의 형성 과정과 율령의 성격-포항 중성리신라비의 검토를 중심으로-", 한국고대사연구, (58), pp.171~215 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 김희만, "浦項 中城里新羅碑와 新羅의 官等制", 동국사학, (47), pp.1~26 (2009), 동국사학회
- 노중국, "포항중성리비를 통해 본 麻立干시기 신라의 분쟁처리 절차와 六部체제의 운영", 한국고대사연구, (59), pp.57~94 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 盧泰敦, "蔚珍鳳坪新羅碑와 新羅의 官等制", 韓國古代史硏究, 2 (1989)
- 노태돈, "고구려사 연구", pp.122~134 (1999), 사계절
- 노태돈, "포항중성리신라비와 外位", 한국고대사연구, (59), pp.37~55 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 門田誠一, "角杯と牛殺しの盟誓 : 新羅の祭天儀禮とその周邊, In 古代東アジア地域相の考古學的硏究", pp.259~263 (2006), 學生社
- 박남수, "｢浦項 中城里新羅碑｣에 나타난 新羅 六部와 官等制", 사학연구, (100), pp.447~492 (2010), 한국사학회
- 박남수, "「浦項 中城里新羅碑」의 新釋과 지증왕대 정치 개혁", 한국고대사연구, (60), pp.117~158 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 배용일, "포항중성리신라비의 발견경위와 고대의 포항과 흥해", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.59~84 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 선석열, "인명표기방식을 통해본 포항 중성리신라비", 인문학논총, 14(3), pp.117~138 (2009), 인문과학연구소
- 선석열, "포항 중성리신라비의 금석학적 위치", 浦項 中城里新羅碑 발견기념 학술심포지엄 (2009), 국립경주문화재연구소
- 심현용, "고고자료로 본 5~6세기 신라의 강릉지역 지배방식", 문화재, 42(3), pp.4~24 (2009), 국립문화재연구소
- 尹善泰, "新羅 骨品制의 基礎集團에 관한 硏究", 석사, 國史學科, pp.1992
- 李基東, "新羅 金入宅考, In 新羅骨品制社會와 花郞徒", pp.191~192 (1984), 一潮閣
- 이문기, "中城里新羅碑의 발견과 그 의의-「冷水里碑」의 재음미를 겸하여-", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.5~57 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 이영호, "흥해지역과 포항중성리신라비", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.217~252 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 이용현, "중성리비의 기초적 검토 : 냉수리비·봉평비와의 비교적 시점, In 포항 중성리 신라비 고찰", 제113회 한국고대사학회 정기 발표회 (2010)
- 이우태, "포항 중성리신라비의 건립 연대와 성격", 浦項 中城里新羅碑 발견기념 학술심포지엄 (2009), 국립경주문화재연구소
- 이한상, "4세기 전후 신라의 지방통제방식 : 분묘자료의 분석을 중심으로", 역사와 현실, 37, pp.50~ (2000)
- 全德在, "新羅六部體制硏究" (1996), 一潮閣
- 전덕재, "포항중성리신라비의 내용과 신라 6부에 대한 새로운 이해", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.85~129 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 전덕재, "6세기 금석문을 통해 본 신라 관등제의 정비과정", 木簡과 文字, 5 (2010)
- 주보돈, "浦項 中城里新羅碑에 대한 硏究 展望", 한국고대사연구, (59), pp.5~36 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 하일식, "신라 집권 관료제 연구" (2006), 혜안
- 하일식, "포항중성리신라비와 신라 관등제", 한국고대사연구, (56), pp.171~216 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 하일식, "주보돈, ｢울진봉평신라비와 신라의 동해안 진출｣에 대한 토론문｣ 울진 봉평리 신라비와 한국 고대 금석문", 울진봉평신라비전시관 개관기념 학술대회, pp.54~ (2011), 한국고대사학회
- 洪承佑, "韓國 古代 律令의 性格", 박사, 國史學科, pp.2011