본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

음운변화로 본 하생원 『주방문』(酒方文)의 필사 연대

A Study on the Record period of the culinary book JUBANGMUN(酒方文); From the viewpoint of phonological changes

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

[The main points of this study are as follows.]In Jubangmun(酒方文)』, the letter ᄨ was used as shown in the word like ‘’. An examination of the historical Korean literature shows that this letter only began to appear in the mid of the 18th century, and this gives us an initial hint as to the writing period of Jubangmun. In Jubangmun, the palatalization process of t>ʧ(ㄷ>ㅈ) amounts to 23.8%, totalling its presence in the word-initial and non-initial positions. Comparing this ratio to that of Seoul’s literature published in the 18th century, we confirm that the record era of Jubangmun was around the mid of the eighteenth century. The change of sk>kk(ㅺ>ㄲ) at the final consonant clusters in a declinable word also confirms this, since such a changing process has occurred more widely in Jubangmun than in Eumsikdimibang, [which was written in the early eighteenth century.]The vowel change ʌ>ɨ(ㆍ>ㅡ) has been detected to occur in Jubangmun. However, the vowel change ʌ>a(ㆍ>k) has not. This indicates that the vowel ʌ(ㆍ) was still a distinctive sound in the vowel system in the period when Jubangmun was written. This again shows its record status not being in the very last period of the 18th century. In Jubangmun a change like ‘ani>ai’(아니-<아이-), in which the nasal n was deleted in front of the vowel i in the non-initial word, is detected. n-deletion of this sort began to appear in the early 18th century Yeongnam literature and Gaesucheophaesineo(改修捷解新語)』, a Seoul literature published in 1748. Based on the above observations, I conclude that the record period of Jubangmun dates as back as to early eighteenth century(about 1700-1735). This conclusion should be invariable irrespective of the dialectal backgrounds of Jugangmun whether it is Gyeongang- or other dialects in southern area of Korea. The crucial piece of evidence for this conclusion comes from the presence of ‘아이-’[ai](presumably with a slightly nasalized vowel i) in Jubangmun, the original form of which had been ‘아니-’[ani].

Abstract

[The main points of this study are as follows.]In Jubangmun(酒方文)』, the letter ᄨ was used as shown in the word like ‘’. An examination of the historical Korean literature shows that this letter only began to appear in the mid of the 18th century, and this gives us an initial hint as to the writing period of Jubangmun. In Jubangmun, the palatalization process of t>ʧ(ㄷ>ㅈ) amounts to 23.8%, totalling its presence in the word-initial and non-initial positions. Comparing this ratio to that of Seoul’s literature published in the 18th century, we confirm that the record era of Jubangmun was around the mid of the eighteenth century. The change of sk>kk(ㅺ>ㄲ) at the final consonant clusters in a declinable word also confirms this, since such a changing process has occurred more widely in Jubangmun than in Eumsikdimibang, [which was written in the early eighteenth century.]The vowel change ʌ>ɨ(ㆍ>ㅡ) has been detected to occur in Jubangmun. However, the vowel change ʌ>a(ㆍ>k) has not. This indicates that the vowel ʌ(ㆍ) was still a distinctive sound in the vowel system in the period when Jubangmun was written. This again shows its record status not being in the very last period of the 18th century. In Jubangmun a change like ‘ani>ai’(아니-<아이-), in which the nasal n was deleted in front of the vowel i in the non-initial word, is detected. n-deletion of this sort began to appear in the early 18th century Yeongnam literature and Gaesucheophaesineo(改修捷解新語)』, a Seoul literature published in 1748. Based on the above observations, I conclude that the record period of Jubangmun dates as back as to early eighteenth century(about 1700-1735). This conclusion should be invariable irrespective of the dialectal backgrounds of Jugangmun whether it is Gyeongang- or other dialects in southern area of Korea. The crucial piece of evidence for this conclusion comes from the presence of ‘아이-’[ai](presumably with a slightly nasalized vowel i) in Jubangmun, the original form of which had been ‘아니-’[ani].

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 곽충구, "십팔세기 국어의 음운론적 연구", 국어연구, 43 (1980)
  2. 김귀영, "󰡔주방문󰡕의 조리에 관한 분석적 연구", 한국식문화학회지, 4, pp.335~349 (1986), 한국식문화학회
  3. 김예니, "음식조리서에 나타난 근대국어 부사 연구", 석사, pp.2012
  4. 김주원, "구개음화와 과도교정", 국어학, (29), pp.33~49 (1997), 국어학회
  5. 김주원, "국어의 방언 분화와 발달, In 한국문화사상대계", pp.151~185 (2000), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
  6. 金周弼, "17·8세기 국어의 구개음화와 관련 음운현상에 대한 통시론적 연구", 박사, pp.1994
  7. 김주필, "영조의 <어졔>에 나타난 와 ㅡ의 표기와 음성 실현 양상", 어문학논총, pp.87~107 (2004), 국민대학교 어문학연구소
  8. 김주필, "18세기 譯書類 문헌과 王室 문헌의 音韻變化*-ㄷ口蓋音化와 圓脣母音化를 중심으로-", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(2), pp.29~58 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
  9. 박은향, "조선 후기 한글 음식조리서 『주방문』의 음운 연구", 석사, pp.2005
  10. 백두현, "오 으 우’의 대립관계와 원순모음화", 국어학, (17), pp.177~202 (1988), 국어학회
  11. 백두현, "영남문헌어의 음운사연구" (1992), 태학사
  12. 백두현, "19세기 국어의 음운사적 연구 - 모음론", 한국문화, (20), pp.1~47 (1997), 서울대 한국학연구소
  13. 백두현, "󰡔음식디미방󰡕의 내용과 구성에 관한 연구", 영남학, (창간), pp.249~280 (2003), 경북대학교 영남문화연구원
  14. 백두현, "󰡔음식디미방󰡕의 표기법과 자음변화 고찰", 국어사연구, (4), pp.95~121 (2004), 국어사학회
  15. 백두현, "진행 중인 음운변화의 출현 빈도와 음운사적 의미 - 17세기 후기 자료 음식디미방의 자음변화를 중심으로 -", 어문학, (90), pp.45~72 (2005), 한국어문학회
  16. 의 서지·국어학적 연구, "구결연구", 2006, 275~331, pp.구결학회
  17. 서보월, "󰡔온주법󰡕의 말자음군 표기", 안동어문학, 4, pp.23~44 (1999), 안동어문학회
  18. 송지혜, "온도감각어의 통시적 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  19. 신하영, "신활자본 음식조리서의 음운 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2011
  20. 안대현, "한국어 중앙어 ㄷ구개음화의 발생 시기", 國語學, (54), pp.109~137 (2009), 국어학회
  21. 안병희, "국어사 자료 연구" (1992), 문학과 지성사
  22. 안주현, "대구·안동 지역어의 비모음화와 고모음화 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2009
  23. 연규동, "역어유해 현존본에 대한 일고찰", 국어학, (26), pp.293~316 (1995)
  24. 연규동, "近代國語 語彙集 연구 : 類解類 譯學書를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1996
  25. 이기문, "개정 국어사개설" (1972), 민중서관
  26. 이기문, "국어음운사연구" (1972), 탑출판사
  27. 李明奎, "口蓋音化에 대한 通時的 硏究", 박사, pp.1992
  28. 이명규, "중세 및 근대 국어의 구개음화" (2000), 한국문화사
  29. 이선영, "<음식디미방>과 <주방문>의 어휘 연구", 어문학, (84), pp.123~150 (2004), 한국어문학회
  30. 이성우, "한국식경대전" (1981), 향문사
  31. 전광현, "십칠세기 국어의 연구", 국어연구, 19 (1967)
  32. 全美貞, "19세기 國語의 音韻論的 연구", 석사, pp.1990
  33. 최전승, "원순모음화 현상의 내적 발달과 개별 방언 어휘적 특질", 국어문학, (34), pp.103~150 (1999), 국어문학회
  34. 최전승, "국어사 연구에서 언어 사실과 그 해석의 논리: ‘’의 경우", 배달말, (37), pp.99~125 (2005), 배달말학회
  35. 홍윤표, "구개음화에 대한 역사적 연구", 진단학보, 60, pp.143~157 (1985), 진단학회
  36. 홍윤표, "근대국어연구(1)" (1994), 태학사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)