본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선후기 호구정책과 문중형성의 관계 - 제주도 대정현 하모리 사례 -

Relationship between the Household Policy and Descendant Group Formation in Late Joseon Dynasty -Case of Hamo Village Daejeong County Jeju Island-

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The government strictly managed Jeju-do residents' duty for the nation according to their status (jikyeok: 職役) until the 1870s. Therefore, residents' class mobility-related various information can be obtained through Jeju island family register. In the 19th century, when the government imposed residents' duty for the nation according to their status, based on the strict standard, the status of ancestors impacted their descendants the most powerfully. The status ascent of descendants, belonging to the middle class of free citizens, to the upper class was extremely difficult. To the descendants of the lower class of free citizens and slave servants, the way to ascend to the upper class of free citizens was actually closed. In Jeju island in the 19th century, the same clan living the same village did not even think they were the same kind of people having the same ancestors. The reason is that household register disturbed their unity. The household register in reality had more power than the ancestral gods. The household register was a fearful subject itself to the Jeju island residents in the 19th century, because, the government collected almost all the taxes, based on the household register. In late 19th century, the tax amount imposed upon the Jeju residents was enormous enough to shake their life basis. In such a situation, those who can escape from the tax pressure to some degree, tend to have privileged sense. In this regard, residents' duty for the nation according to their status was more important than the fact of the same surname and the same family origin to the Jeju island residents.

Abstract

The government strictly managed Jeju-do residents' duty for the nation according to their status (jikyeok: 職役) until the 1870s. Therefore, residents' class mobility-related various information can be obtained through Jeju island family register. In the 19th century, when the government imposed residents' duty for the nation according to their status, based on the strict standard, the status of ancestors impacted their descendants the most powerfully. The status ascent of descendants, belonging to the middle class of free citizens, to the upper class was extremely difficult. To the descendants of the lower class of free citizens and slave servants, the way to ascend to the upper class of free citizens was actually closed. In Jeju island in the 19th century, the same clan living the same village did not even think they were the same kind of people having the same ancestors. The reason is that household register disturbed their unity. The household register in reality had more power than the ancestral gods. The household register was a fearful subject itself to the Jeju island residents in the 19th century, because, the government collected almost all the taxes, based on the household register. In late 19th century, the tax amount imposed upon the Jeju residents was enormous enough to shake their life basis. In such a situation, those who can escape from the tax pressure to some degree, tend to have privileged sense. In this regard, residents' duty for the nation according to their status was more important than the fact of the same surname and the same family origin to the Jeju island residents.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 善生永助, "朝鮮の聚落, 조선총독부", ~ (1923)
  2. "歸田錄 處族親", ~
  3. 심재우, "조선후기 단성현 법물야면 유학호의 분포와 성격", 역사와 현실, 55 (2001)
  4. 송양섭, "19세기 유학층(幼學層)의 증가양상 - <<단성호적대장>>을 중심으로 -", 역사와 현실, 55(55), pp.323~345 (2005), 한국역사연구회
  5. 최재석, "濟州島의 親族組織" (1979), 일지사
  6. 정진영, "조선후기 호적대장 '호(戶)'의 편제(編制) 양상 - 『제주 대정현 하모슬리 호적중초』(1843-1907)의 분석 -", 역사와 현실, 45(45), pp.227~262 (2002), 한국역사연구회
  7. 허원영, "19세기 제주도의 호구와 부세운영", 박사, 고고학, pp.2006
  8. 권내현, "朝鮮後期 戶籍의 作成過程에 대한 分析", 대동문화연구, 39 (2002)
  9. "備邊司謄錄 숙종 45년 10월 7일", ~
  10. 鄭亨芝, "조선후기 交濟創의 설치와 운영", 梨大史苑, 28 (1995)
  11. 姜昌龍, "19세기 濟州社會 硏究" (1997), 일지사
  12. 김건태, "18~19세기 제주도 여성의 결혼과 출산", 대동문화연구, (65), pp.311~349 (2009), 대동문화연구원
  13. 김건태, "戶口出入을 통해 본 18세기 戶籍大帳의 編制方式 - 丹城戶籍大帳을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 44, pp.171~207 (2003), 대동문화연구원
  14. 이영훈, "18-19세기 農家의 家系繼承의 추이-경상도 丹城縣 法勿也面 戶籍에서-", 경제사학, 39, pp.3~25 (2005), 경제사학회
  15. "耽羅職方說", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)