孤山 尹善道의 山論 연구
An Analysis on the writings of Yun Seondo(尹善道) related to the determination process for the site of Yeongleung(寧陵), the tomb of King Hyojong(孝宗)
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I examine the writings of Yun Seondo(尹善道, 1587~1671) related to the determination process for the site of Yeongleung(寧陵), the tomb of King Hyojong(孝宗). There remained five writings related to this process in Gosanyugo(孤山遺稿), Collection of Writings of Yun Seondo. It consist of two letters to Shim Jiwon(沈之源) who was in the charge of royal funeral of King Hyojong, one letter to Shim Kwongsu(沈光洙) who was Royal Secretary of King Hyeonjong(顯宗), one discussion writing on candidate sites for royal tomb, and one pleading letter against impeachment on himself. In the many literatures on the Korean history of Fengshui(風水), Yun was understood as he had insisted the province Suwon(水原) for the site of Yeongleung in the determination process, and as he predicted the movement of the Yeonglueng to the new site after fifteen years. With the examination, I show that this understanding do not accord with the writings of Yun remained in the Gosanyugo. He recommended the site of province Yeoju, near by the tomb of King Sejong(世宗) in first, and Suwon in second for the tomb of King Hyojong. He was misunderstood as a main advocate for Suwon from that times. I show that the letters sent to the Shim Jiwon and Shim Kwangsu had purpose on the explanation his exact position. I also show that we can not find any evidences for his prediction about the movement of the Yeongleung to the new site after fifteen years. I show that his images as an advocate for Suwon and predictor of movement of royal tomb were made after his death by the persons such as Hong Wuwon(洪宇遠), Heo Mok(許穆), and King Jeongjo(正祖).
Abstract
In this article, I examine the writings of Yun Seondo(尹善道, 1587~1671) related to the determination process for the site of Yeongleung(寧陵), the tomb of King Hyojong(孝宗). There remained five writings related to this process in Gosanyugo(孤山遺稿), Collection of Writings of Yun Seondo. It consist of two letters to Shim Jiwon(沈之源) who was in the charge of royal funeral of King Hyojong, one letter to Shim Kwongsu(沈光洙) who was Royal Secretary of King Hyeonjong(顯宗), one discussion writing on candidate sites for royal tomb, and one pleading letter against impeachment on himself. In the many literatures on the Korean history of Fengshui(風水), Yun was understood as he had insisted the province Suwon(水原) for the site of Yeongleung in the determination process, and as he predicted the movement of the Yeonglueng to the new site after fifteen years. With the examination, I show that this understanding do not accord with the writings of Yun remained in the Gosanyugo. He recommended the site of province Yeoju, near by the tomb of King Sejong(世宗) in first, and Suwon in second for the tomb of King Hyojong. He was misunderstood as a main advocate for Suwon from that times. I show that the letters sent to the Shim Jiwon and Shim Kwangsu had purpose on the explanation his exact position. I also show that we can not find any evidences for his prediction about the movement of the Yeongleung to the new site after fifteen years. I show that his images as an advocate for Suwon and predictor of movement of royal tomb were made after his death by the persons such as Hong Wuwon(洪宇遠), Heo Mok(許穆), and King Jeongjo(正祖).
참고문헌 (16)
- 오상학, "조선후기 지식인의 풍수인식, In 21세기 과학 기술정신, 실학자들에게 배운다", 실학 컨퍼런스 발표자료집, pp.167~183 (2007)
- 박권수, "17세기 조선왕실의 王陵地 선정 과정과 方外地師의 역할 - 孝宗과 顯宗대의 山陵 조성 과정을 중심으로 -", 문화역사지리, 27(1), pp.33~47 (2015), 한국문화역사지리학회
- 김두규, "조선 풍수학인의 생애와 논쟁", pp.380~ (2000), 궁리
- 이규원, "조선왕릉실록", pp.317~ (2012), 글로세움
- 이덕형, "조선왕릉 擇地와 山論", 박사, 사학과 한국사전공, pp.2013
- 김병헌, "孝宗大王 寧陵의 擇山 논쟁", 조선시대사학보, (69), pp.137~166 (2014), 조선시대사학회
- "顯宗實錄 권1", ~
- "孝宗寧陵山陵都監儀軌", ~
- "孤山遺稿", ~
- 이상현, "고산유고 3" (2015), 한국고전번역원
- "眉叟記言別集 권19", ~
- "國朝寶鑑 권39", ~
- "煉藜室記述 권30", ~
- "弘齋全書 57", ~
- "顯隆園園所都監儀軌", ~
- "『日省錄』 정조 20년 1월 23일(庚午)", ~
