고려후기 상반된 질서의 공존과 그 역사적 의미
Coexistence of Two Contradictory social orders in the latter half period of Goryeo, and the Historical Meaning of such Coexistence
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During the so-called ‘Yuan Intervention period,’ two contradictory orders were coexisting throughout the entire Goryeo society. One was an aspiration to preserve Goryeo traditions, based upon the legendary agreement that had reportedly been reached between Goryeo king Weonjong and Yuan Emperor Qubilai. The other was a determination to negate the indigenous nature of Goryeo culture, including the social stratification platform, in favor of an entirely new system. This kind of situation was brought on by Yuan empire’s apparent dominative position and Goryeo’s subsequent embracement of Yuan culture and philosophy, which would have undoubtedly inspired some Goryeo people to change or modify the culture and order they had previously enjoyed. As a result, even after the Yuan empire was gone, the Goryeo people came to consider all the institutions and practices left by Yuan as part of many options that they could base their operations on, and also found themselves torn between different choices to approach a single situation. Goryeo was facing a task of creating a balance and forming a compromise, but was not able to see to it to the very end, so the task was handed over to the newly born Joseon dynasty.
Abstract
During the so-called ‘Yuan Intervention period,’ two contradictory orders were coexisting throughout the entire Goryeo society. One was an aspiration to preserve Goryeo traditions, based upon the legendary agreement that had reportedly been reached between Goryeo king Weonjong and Yuan Emperor Qubilai. The other was a determination to negate the indigenous nature of Goryeo culture, including the social stratification platform, in favor of an entirely new system. This kind of situation was brought on by Yuan empire’s apparent dominative position and Goryeo’s subsequent embracement of Yuan culture and philosophy, which would have undoubtedly inspired some Goryeo people to change or modify the culture and order they had previously enjoyed. As a result, even after the Yuan empire was gone, the Goryeo people came to consider all the institutions and practices left by Yuan as part of many options that they could base their operations on, and also found themselves torn between different choices to approach a single situation. Goryeo was facing a task of creating a balance and forming a compromise, but was not able to see to it to the very end, so the task was handed over to the newly born Joseon dynasty.
참고문헌 (39)
- 이기남, "충선왕의 개혁과 사림원의 설치", 역사학보, 52 (1971)
- 김윤곤, "한국사 9" (1974), 국사편찬위원회
- 민현구, "고려후기의 권문세족의 성립", 호남문화연구, 6 (1974)
- 김광철, "고려후기세족층연구" (1991), 동아대학교출판부
- 이익주, "고려·원관계의 구조에 대한 연구: 소위 세조구제의 분석을 중심으로", 한국사론, 36 (1996)
- 이익주, "충선왕 즉위년 개혁정치의 성격: 관제개편을 중심으로", 역사와현실, 7 (1992)
- 김형수, "원 간섭기 고려의 정치세력과 정국동향", 박사, 한국사, pp.2002
- 도현철, "14세기 고려의 정치와 사회" (1994), 민음사
- 마종락, "원간섭기 익재 이제현의 유학사상", 한국중세사연구, 8 (2000)
- 金炯秀, "策問을 통해 본 李齊賢의 現實認識", 한국중세사연구, 13, pp.179~206 (2002), 한국중세사학회
- 채웅석, "원간섭기 성리학자들의 화이관과 국가관", 역사와 현실, (49), pp.99~124 (2003), 한국역사연구회
- 李康漢, "고려 충선왕의 국정 및 ‘구제’ 복원", 진단학보, (105), pp.73~109 (2008), 진단학회
- 이강한, "고려 충선왕의 정치개혁과 元의 영향", 한국문화, (43), pp.267~300 (2008), 규장각한국학연구원
- "고려사", ~
- 노명호, "한국고대중세고문서연구(상)", pp.455~ (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 이종서, "고려 국왕과 관리의 복식(服飾)이 반영하는 국가 위상과 자의식의 변동", 한국문화, (60), pp.37~63 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원
- 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자", 한국사연구, 105 (1999)
- "動安居士集 권4", ~
- "稼亭集 권10", ~
- 李康漢, "征東行省官 闊里吉思의고려제도 개변 시도", 한국사연구, (139), pp.83~128 (2007), 한국사연구회
- 이종서, "고려 후기 얼자(孽子)의 지위 향상과 그 역사적 배경", 역사와 현실, (97), pp.163~191 (2015), 한국역사연구회
- 李益柱, "高麗·元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制", 박사, 국사학, pp.1996
- 權寧國, "고려후기 군사제도 연구", 박사, 국사학, pp.1995
- 김보광, "고려 충렬왕의 케시크제 도입과 그 의도", 사학연구, (107), pp.125~168 (2012), 한국사학회
- 小林高四郞, "通制條格の硏究 제1책", pp.257~ (1964), 中國刑法志硏究會
- "통제조격", ~
- 김당택, "원간섭하의 고려정치사" (1998), 일조각
- 이종서, "高麗後期 이후 ‘同氣’ 理論의 전개와血緣意識의 變動", 동방학지, (120), pp.1~35 (2003), 국학연구원
- 주채혁, "손보기박사정년기념한국사학논총" (1988)
- 주채혁, "몽골-고려사 연구의 재검토: 몽골·고려 전쟁사 연구의 시각문제", 애산학보, 3(1) (1989)
- 김형수, "충선왕의 복위와 복위교서의 성격", 대구사학, 56 (1998)
- 우경섭, "조선중화주의의 성립과 동아시아", pp.51~ (2013), 유니스토리
- "拙藁千百 권2", ~
- 김용선, "고려묘지명집성", pp.531~ (2012), 한림대학교출판부
- "牧隱詩藁 권13", ~
- 이정란, "고려시대 서얼 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2003
- 의 發見, "동양사학연구", 2003, 6~202, pp.동양사학회
- "稼亭先生文集", ~
- "牧隱文藁 권18", ~